JB pilots say no to alpa/Barely

[Blue Dude]

So union = bankruptcy. Got it.

 

[mejorgy]

OK, then, screw ALPA. Now that that's out of your system, what's your solution?

Blue Dude..... Do you find it humorous when guys as are willing to demonize ALPA but unwilling to offer a solution-any solution to the very real concerns which pertain to life as a professional pilot? Yeah....screw ALPA...that's a solution!

I have come across many of my JB colleagues over the past year who adamantly state the need for a union (CBA) but were not willing to vote yes in the election. I asked them, "So who should we elect to represent us"? Teamsters, TWU, how about the United Auto Workers? Hell...lets elect the Screen Actors Guild!!!! They have a decent contract. Fact of the matter is, I too am no fan of ALPA nor unions for that matter, but I am grossly aware that during these times of airline mergers, SLI integrations and not to mention my company's lack of accountability pertaining to changes to our work rules, retirement and the list goes on and on......................we as a professional group, NEED SOMETHING and ALPA was just about the only game in town! So ALPA it was and ALPA it wont be because 1193 view things differently than I do! Who's to say if an acquisition or merger occurs? In the end, we will see who is left standing and who will get steam rolled....if it ever happens!! (and it probably will)

True..... I started work for JB knowing what to expect. (No Union) But I think most guys who have been here 4 or more years will agree, this isn't the same JB it used to be! And for you playa-haters who say, "if you dont like it here, go somewhere else"! If a viable opportunity presents itself... I will leave. This is why I quote your remark versus the smart asses who are willing to say "screw Alpa" but not offer a plausible response or solution!

Hate Away.........................playa's

 

[Fins Up]

Blue Dude..... Do you find it humorous when guys as are willing to demonize ALPA but unwilling to offer a solution-any solution to the very real concerns which pertain to life as a professional pilot? Yeah....screw ALPA...that's a solution!

I have come across many of my JB colleagues over the past year who adamantly state the need for a union (CBA) but were not willing to vote yes in the election. I asked them, "So who should we elect to represent us"? Teamsters, TWU, how about the United Auto Workers? Hell...lets elect the Screen Actors Guild!!!! They have a decent contract. Fact of the matter is, I too am no fan of ALPA nor unions for that matter, but I am grossly aware that during these times of airline mergers, SLI integrations and not to mention my company's lack of accountability pertaining to changes to our work rules, retirement and the list goes on and on......................we as a professional group, NEED SOMETHING and ALPA was just about the only game in town! So ALPA it was and ALPA it wont be because 1193 view things differently than I do! Who's to say if an acquisition or merger occurs? In the end, we will see who is left standing and who will get steam rolled....if it ever happens!! (and it probably will)

True..... I started work for JB knowing what to expect. (No Union) But I think most guys who have been here 4 or more years will agree, this isn't the same JB it used to be! And for you playa-haters who say, "if you dont like it here, go somewhere else"! If a viable opportunity presents itself... I will leave. This is why I quote your remark versus the smart asses who are willing to say "screw Alpa" but not offer a plausible response or solution!

Hate Away.........................playa's

I think you missed bluedude's sarcasm. I believe he wants a cba, ALPA or otherwise, as much as the rest of us yes-voters do.

 

[Ski-N-Fly]

When has a union done that at an airline going BK or out of business? BTW Airline and secure career in the same sentence? Isn't that an oxymoran?

Perhaps it is an oxymoron, but you didn't answer my question. You merely asked another question. To answer your question, no union can utlimately prevent an airline from BK or from going out of business. I never implied this. Perhaps I should re-phrase my original question......

How do you propose we secure (and protect) our careers (as best as we can) without representation and a CBA?

 

[Flyby1206]

Be better than the competition. That's the only way to guarantee success. Union or not

 

[pilotyip]

So union = bankruptcy. Got it.

I don't think so? I was posting they can not prevent BK nor can they preserve jobs or benefits in a failing environment.

 

[Turbosnake03]

Be better than the competition. That's the only way to guarantee success. Union or not

someone gets it !!!!

 

[mejorgy]

I think you missed bluedude's sarcasm. I believe he wants a cba, ALPA or otherwise, as much as the rest of us yes-voters do.

Oh.....I know!! I would rather respond to Blue Dude versus responding to the mindless, useless nonsense of the "screw ALPA" indigents. I think Blue Dude and I are on the same page. As are many others.

 

[pilotyip]

Perhaps it is an oxymoron, but you didn't answer my question. You merely asked another question. To answer your question, no union can utlimately prevent an airline from BK or from going out of business. I never implied this. Perhaps I should re-phrase my original question......

How do you propose we secure (and protect) our careers (as best as we can) without representation and a CBA?

as per above "Be better than the rest", but unions often forget about this and become involved in the "Whats in it for me" remember this is coming from a former union guy. With two dead airlines under his belt

 

[Blue Dude]

I don't think so? I was posting they can not prevent BK nor can they preserve jobs or benefits in a failing environment.

Then you answered a question that wasn't asked (and in the process tried to imply a correlation between unions and airline bankruptcy). No union can prevent bad management from being bad management. But a CBA can mitigate the consequences of adverse decisions or circumstances, even if that mitigation is merely a court-enforced procedure to integrate two lists or spell out furlough procedures. Mitigate <> ironclad protection, and nobody is saying it is.

 

[Blue Dude]

Be better than the competition. That's the only way to guarantee success. Union or not

Nice glib, tidy answer, and true in a general sense, right up until the point where corporate or shareholder interests no longer align with pilot interests. e.g. a merger, acquisition, code share, downsize, fragmentation, divestment, et al. Then success is "guaranteed" for who? Probably not the pilots, who have no say in the matter. A CBA will not prevent any of those things, but if drafted carefully would protect the pilots from being left by the wayside and provide a mechanism for recognizing the pilots' stake and mitigating (there's that word again) any adverse impact.

 

[Ski-N-Fly]

as per above "Be better than the rest", but unions often forget about this and become involved in the "Whats in it for me" remember this is coming from a former union guy. With two dead airlines under his belt

I'm all for being better than the competition, but this is a blanket statement. One can disect this in many ways. A company can be better in finances, route structure, ticket pricing, customer service, paint schemes, keeping labor costs down, outsourcing for cheaper labor, giving it's managers industry leading bonuses, laying off front line employees to stay afloat, etc, etc. But when it comes to an airline pilot's career, success for the company does not always guarantee a secure and protected career for it's pilots. Can't the "what's in it for me" mentality also be applied to management?

I see your point, Yip, but your past experiences with your previous unions, management teams, and pilot groups do not necessarily reflect what exists with this pilot group. Nor does it mean that this pilot group has a "what's in it for me" mentality. I am not trying to shove a union down your throat, but I honestly think this pilot group is walkng a high wire without a net. I'm not saying ALPA is the answer, nor am I saying our management is evil. But we simply don't have the protections in place (legal, medical, retirement, etc, etc) to provide for a safe and prosperous career. This is my opinion, and may not be the same as yours, but I am just trying to stimulate conversation on the topic. Without a CBA, we can not legally separate ourselves from the other employee groups when it comes to issues such as medical, retirement, etc. There are pilots on the property who have been left to fend for themselves when it comes to legal and medical issues. I believe we need a system of checks and balances, not only to protect our pilots, but to protect our entire company. A CBA is currently the only system where both sides have to be held accountable and abide by the same rules.....thereby providing a legal system of checks and balances.

If you're in an incident or accident, and the company decides they will not provide you with an attorney (this has happened at bluejet), then what do you do next? If you have a medical issue with the FAA, and the company decides not to provide you with the proper resources to pursue a solution (this has happened at bluejet), then where do you go for help? My point is that in the end, each one of us is on our own. We can hope the company will come through for us, but there are specific examples of this not being the case.

I think we all want what is best for our families, but it's obvious we need to come together and figure out how to go about making sure we can accomplish this. This is a business, not just for the company, but for it's pilots as well. When making important business decisions, logic can be far more beneficial to the outcome than emotion. Just sayin. Regardless, we are all in this together.

 

[n757st]

This is the fact..... If JBPA were on the ballet it would have passed. This was not an endorsement of the DR, nor a condemnation of a CBA. It was anti ALPA vote, plain and simple.

 

[Caveman]

This is the fact..... If JBPA were on the ballet it would have passed. This was not an endorsement of the DR, nor a condemnation of a CBA. It was anti ALPA vote, plain and simple.

That's not a fact. It's just your opinion.

BTW, JBPA was in fact available on the ballot. All you had to do was vote yes and write in JBPA. If all the alleged anti-ALPA voters had done that the JBPA would now be our bargaining agent. The truth is they didn't do that even though it was an available and viable option. So I can only conclude that the anti-ALPA rationale is simply an attempt to ease guilty consciences. They could have voted for JBPA, but they didn't.

 

[n757st]

That's not a fact. It's just your opinion.

BTW, JBPA was in fact available on the ballot. All you had to do was vote yes and write in JBPA. If all the alleged anti-ALPA voters had done that the JBPA would now be our bargaining agent. The truth is they didn't do that even though it was an available and viable option. So I can only conclude that the anti-ALPA rationale is simply an attempt to ease guilty consciences. They could have voted for JBPA, but they didn't.

By writing in JBPA it was a vote for ALPA. You are right, it is opinion not fact.