79%N1 said:Well, other than Horizon, those are all of the Regional carriers that fly 70 seaters. Who else can I compare? I don't think anyone should have to take paycuts....but I disagree that the aircraft are already decided on where they go. Look at Skywest already taking 13 700's from ASA! How can we think they won't take more? The point of the chart was for me to find out how my pay compares with others, to see if my CNC was in line in what we are asking for.....and guess what? It isnt! We are already $6-7/hr more than everyone else. How do we think we can get another 9%, and then keep the flying? Can SKYW not open a base in ATL to fly more 70's? How about them opening a base in ATL to get the new (proposed) 90's? Of course they can. Rumor is, Mesa will be getting the 900 flying anyway, not ASA. I didnt invent the pay to play, and I don't like it. I just think we need to be careful in what we are asking for, and I don't think too many people understand where we are in relation to the competition. I really foresee small decreases for 70 Captains at ASA, and FO's going to one rate for all aircraft. (Fo's always get sold out anyway, right) Throw in some profit sharing and some sort of rig or min day, more liberal swapping rules and our w2's will come out ahead. We can, and should meet management at some compromise where we can all come out ahead.
When did those companies agree to those payrates? Comair is in BK, Sky******************** is well Sky********************, and CHQ and Mesa, do you really want to drive yourselves to the pit of Mesa,what about Eagle, they signed that contract years ago, How long has the ASA pilot group been in negotiations? What is so unique about Horizon? You guys need to stop the race to the bottom. You can believe the planes are already decided where they are going, reference the Comair and ASA RFP years ago, when ASA said go pound dirt and ASA got the AIRPLANES ANYWAY, Jerry has a plan.