To my fellow Midwest pilots,
Over the last four days, I have tried to address an extremely divisive issue that has been propagated by a few among us regarding your union leaders’ schedules. If you still have questions, call to get the facts.
I didn’t set out to write these letters because I felt a real need to defend myself or others in the leadership, I did so because this divisiveness will kill our pilot group’s chances to achieve its goals as we approach negotiations. Maybe that’s exactly what some want, but I think the majority of us want to continue our successes far into the future.
In today’s letter I want to talk about another issue that that came out in the contract survey which I believe is equally, if not even more divisive – this issue deals with seniority.
First, I want to make it perfectly clear that I do understand the effects of 9/11, the ongoing financial troubles of this airline at the hands of this management group, and the personal effects these issues have created in all our lives. While I know that I have not personally walked in their shoes, I have tried to understand the effects of these events on my fellow pilots who became downgraded Captains or furloughed First Officers. I am grateful that each of these downgraded Captains have since had the opportunity to return to the left seat and that we were able to do some things that allowed almost all of our formerly furloughed pilots to return if they desired. If management had only done a few things differently, maybe we would have been able to recover EVERY former Midwest pilot who they furloughed. If anyone who has flown with me over the years feels I do not understand the junior pilots’ plight here at Midwest and have demonstrated a contemptuous or uncaring attitude toward you on a personal basis, please get in touch with me.
On a purely representational basis, as your Negotiating Committee Chairman, did we not negotiate a 5 year recall in exchange for pay concessions? Did we not negotiate in a manner that actually forced our management to change the way they operated our airline schedule or change the way they utilized our fleet in order grow our airline and to realize their cost savings? Did we not just let them get away with negotiating in a manner that gutted our contract of real dollars to pay for their mistakes? Doesn't growth equate to jobs? Did we not recall our pilots, who wanted to return, faster than almost anyone else in the industry that furloughed pilots also? You know the answers – of course we did all of these things!
Many may not realize that we also created provisions in our contract that allowed our pilots overall to realize earnings that were the highest in ALPA last year for narrow-body domestic aircraft. The fact is these earning exceeded the abilities of some wide-body pilots at other properties.
Some insinuate that the union leadership cares more about the senior pilots because of the fact that our pay scales had to be extended to 15 and 16 years during the contract restructuring that occurred in 2003 to recover the “real” money what was achieved in Contract 2000. While the majority of the pilot group was able to offset cost of living increases even immediately following the restructuring, the pilots who were scaled out at 14 years did not receive any additional increases (COLAs or otherwise) until the second year of the Restructuring Agreement. This phase in of pay rates ended up recovering the rates that were already present in Contract 2000 but those pilots were forced to wait another two years of longevity to realize them.
The simple fact is that, since February of 2000, we have only had only ONE opportunity to negotiate increases in any areas in our contract for our pilots. This was the failed contract extension talks in August this year. Do you know that management was looking for additional relief in the contract (concessions – again), while looking for an extension? Do you know that they proposed pay rate increases over the extended years that did even not come close to cost of living adjustments? Do you know what our strategy and agenda was for those negotiations? Do you know what our proposals contained? Do you know what cross section of our seniority list would have prospered the most? Did you participate in the two teleconferences we had and listened to my breakdown of the failed negotiations? Did you ask any questions regarding the information I gave? If you did, I do not know how in the world you can accuse the MEC, me, or my committee of favoritism. Have you even called to inquire about the negotiations, if you were unable to attend the teleconference calls?
To date, I have not received one call. We created a fundamentally solid 1st agreement in 2000, with provisions that many mature contracts are without. Until this upcoming September 2008, we have never had the legal vehicle to address all the items in our contract in a progressive manner. In our only limited opportunity that occurred this year, your Negotiating Committee and MEC attempted to get management to restore longevity for our former furloughed pilots. Unfortunately, management was unwilling to even entertain that idea despite its miniscule cost increase.
We have constantly been developing strategies for future negotiations, while waiting patiently for our second "bite at the apple". The last time we negotiated a full contract, Contract 2000, we set it up for growth. Your leadership, like many of you, was told to expect a 1000 pilot airline. Unfortunately for all of us, like many of management’s claims over the years, that didn’t happen. I for one look forward to our upcoming negotiations with the knowledge that we will again, as Capt. S recently stated, “be able to meet management on an even playing field at the bargaining table” and attempt to meet the contractual needs of the pilot group both junior and senior.
Sincerely,
Captain SH
Negotiating Committee Chairman
Merger Committee Chairman
National Collective Bargaining Committee Member