Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

I’m confused I thought the PNCL TA was industry leading?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I would call it a Mesaba perspective, XJs performance numbers would agree. We've been flying to NY and ATL for years with no difference in operations than any other city.

Hopefully, this is one of those items that is fixed with the merger.
Swing and a miss, Murf.

It has nothing to do with "performance," as it does with what is scheduled. Delta schedules a flight 2:45 long. Pinnacle's trip value average has the flight worth 2:17. You lose :28 minutes you would otherwise have if you had true block or better.

No use complaining now. What's done is done. Maybe someday, people at our combined companies will realize that they've been shortchanging themselves with this Trip Value BS.
 
Swing and a miss, Murf.

It has nothing to do with "performance," as it does with what is scheduled. Delta schedules a flight 2:45 long. Pinnacle's trip value average has the flight worth 2:17. You lose :28 minutes you would otherwise have if you had true block or better.

No use complaining now. What's done is done. Maybe someday, people at our combined companies will realize that they've been shortchanging themselves with this Trip Value BS.

Totally agree. This contract won't fix the fact that all our trips are blocked at 25 hours with credit at 22:20.

But you can't win an argument with stupid people. They already know they are right.
 
Not a miss at all. Reread your post.
I wouldn't call it a 'Mesaba perspective', it is and old NWA perspective. NWA had the three most reliable hubs in the inductry, and their marketing times reflected that. As more of your business moves to NY and ATL (it will) you will discover the pain of working in a marketing system that melts down by nine most mornings.
You imply that since we move more operations to NY and ATL that we "discover the pain..." My point is, we've been flying there for awhile and it has not changed our operations or performance numbers.

Mesaba's perception of pattern building is that of credits being within a minute or two of block. Obviously, 9Es system has been different, with large gaps in credit/block.

Hopefully this will change for the better with the merger.
 
Last edited:
Mesaba's perception of pattern building is that of credits being within a minute or two of block. Obviously, 9Es system has been different, with large gaps in credit/block.

Hopefully this will change for the better with the merger.

Mesaba, nor Pinnacle, get to specify what the marketing times are. DAL does that. Even if Mesaba did get to specify the market times, it wouldn't matter anymore because Mesaba doesn't really exist anymore.
 
Mesaba, nor Pinnacle, get to specify what the marketing times are. DAL does that. Even if Mesaba did get to specify the market times, it wouldn't matter anymore because Mesaba doesn't really exist anymore.
We share a holdings company, we share a contract, but Mesaba does, and will continue to exist (as a turboprop operator). Unless Phil has changed the plan and only told you, that is.

Marketing times are a totally different animal. Yes, DAL specifies them. But credit and block are set by our actions and our companies. Here's a real world scenario... MSP-AUS is blocked at 2:47, credited at 2:45, and marketed at 2:55. Marketing times take in other items and add buffers for such things as flow control. This is their tool to keep operation flowing on time from a passengers perspective.
Block is what the flight should take.
Credit is determined based off the average of how long the last 150 flights blocked (at least at XJ).
Marketing times are probably based off our average SAT times, with a buffer for oopses.
I don't know of any airline that gets paid marketing time or better, if that's what you and flypru are suggesting.
 
If by marketing time you mean the scheduled flight time then XJT gets paid the actual flight time or scheduled flight time whichever is greater. We used to have peg times which was an average but those went away with our contract in 1998.
 
If by marketing time you mean the scheduled flight time then XJT gets paid the actual flight time or scheduled flight time whichever is greater. We used to have peg times which was an average but those went away with our contract in 1998.
Think passenger scheduled departure time to scheduled arrival time.
 
Took some digging, but I found an example...

MSP-MSN
Same aircraft Crj200
Blocked 1:14
Credit 1:06
Marketed at 1:14 (for XJ)
Marketed at 1:07 (for 9E)

I'm interested now, what's 9Es block and credit for this segment?
 
Took some digging, but I found an example...

MSP-MSN
Same aircraft Crj200
Blocked 1:14
Credit 1:06
Marketed at 1:14 (for XJ)
Marketed at 1:07 (for 9E)

I'm interested now, what's 9Es block and credit for this segment?

Marketing and what you call "scheduled" times are the same. Why would Mesaba or Pinnacle management reschedule tens of thousands of block hours when Delta has already given them a perfectly good set of times?

PCL's times are:
Market - 1: 07
Scheduled - 1: 07
Credit (with our current TVs) - 1: 04

In your example with the Mesaba times, the system of average block time being the credit for the leg shorts the pilot 8 minutes vs. the most commonly used system of getting paid the greater of scheduled time or actual block. Losing 8 minutes on this leg is equal to a 12% cut in pay. Pretty significant if you ask me. The disparity at PCL is narrower but it varies based on city pair. Looks to me like the Mesaba system is even a worse butt f*cking than what we get at Pinnacle.

:beer: Hears to hoping the Mesaba way of doing things falls by the way side.
 
Care to explain the other scenario then, they're real numbers too.

MSP-AUS
Blocked 2:47 (I guess XJ didn't like DALs' time)
Credited 2:45
Marketed 2:55

For the life of me, I don't know how getting rid of your miserable 15 minutes for free, is screwing you over.

Really, it doesn't matter... the contract is in place, it states SAT (credit) or better. These are the average times we fly from point A to B. You can see these times change monthly, for things like airport construction, or deicing. Fly the contract, fly the profiles, we all make more money.
 
Just for emphasis, here's another one...
MSP-MEM
Blocked 1:57 (if DAL published them, we certainly don't follow them)
Credit 2:01 (oh look a 4% increase)
Marketed 2:11
 
Yes this is what we get at XJT....Scheduled (as far as pax know) departure time to scheduled (as far as pax know) arrival time, plus any overs. Done leg by leg.
Very Nice. A lot of soft money to be made there.

Something to definately shoot for. Unfortunately, not the case for the next 5 years.
 
For the life of me, I don't know how getting rid of your miserable 15 minutes for free, is screwing you over.

Really, it doesn't matter... the contract is in place, it states SAT (credit) or better. These are the average times we fly from point A to B. You can see these times change monthly, for things like airport construction, or deicing. Fly the contract, fly the profiles, we all make more money.

I never said or implied that it was a screw over. I was just pointing out that the system in place at Mesaba (and that would have been in place at PCL had TA 1 passed) is a less desirable system than what is in place at most carriers that truly have "block or better" and it usually comes with reduced pay. Its definitely something to shoot for next time.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top