ultrarunner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 4,322
User997 said:BUT, I am almost 100% confident, that when they busted in the cockpit....
I would argue that in at least on instance, they didn't have to bust in.
think about that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
User997 said:BUT, I am almost 100% confident, that when they busted in the cockpit....
redd said:
Some have even gone as far to suggest, that the flights in question, may very well have been electronically hijacked by existing US military technology, that is capable of commandeering an aircraft through computer-driven, remote recovery, rend-ering cockpit controls and communication, useless. More specifically, it would make hostages of pilots, passengers, and ³hijackers,² alike, and guarantee that certain targets would be reached, above and beyond the unpredictable dispositions and limited skill levels of ³fanatical, 20-something terrorists.² Still others have suggested, that there were various other, assembled, undercover individuals on those flights, possessing diametrically opposed, yet equally fanatical persuasions (and far superior flight training), that were involved in ³using² the Middle Eastern occupants as a ruse, to covertly assume control of the flights beyond detection - and hence blame. Their efforts were further assisted, it is claimed, by the cooperation (if not collaboration), with US intelligence agencies, the US military, and certain elements within the political establishment. If recent events, and the consideration of certain relevant news releases (i.e. the Israeli spy scandal), any indication, this interpretation may yet prove to hold much credence.
That's just plain insane...sounds like chemtrail people should at least study harder before they write this junk.KigAir said:I don't know what's worst, the people who write this stuff or the people who read and believe it.
I was using the phrase "busted in" in more of a liberal sense. It's well documented that the cockpit doors were unlocked, and perhaps even open, that day when they took control of the airplane.ultrarunner said:I would argue that in at least one instance, they didn't have to bust in.
think about that.
Cpt. Underpants said:Have any of you actually TRIED to use a handheld in a 757/767/737/747/A330/A340 cockpit? I bet you haven't, because THEY DON'T WORK!
Why? The windscreens are made out of several sandwiched layers, glass, adhesive, plexiglass and GOLD or Tin Oxide (the heating element) which effectively blocks the antenna. I've tried on several occasions on the B744, A330 and A340 to use my handheld(s) in the cockpit, and it simply will not (cannot) receive a signal.
The scumbags may have been using a GPS handheld to get Lat/Long which they inserted into the FMS.
In fact, the very same Middle Eastern hijackers, that allegedly took control of AA Flight 11, attended classes at flight schools in both Venice and Sarasota, Florida, and were trained by the very same instructors who have routinely flown world-wide missions for various Christian fundamentalist missionary services, from those very same airports and the flight schools therein. These missions have included Pat Robertson¹s ³Operation Blessing² and Jerry Falwell¹s ³World Help². Considering the eager anticipation, for certain ³biblical events² to transpire, from Evangelical figures such as these, this connection, indeed, proves to be a troubling one.
This was going to be my point EXACTLY! I've tried my handheld and it can't see through the widows if they're heated.Cpt. Underpants said:Have any of you actually TRIED to use a handheld in a 757/767/737/747/A330/A340 cockpit? I bet you haven't, because THEY DON'T WORK!
Why? The windscreens are made out of several sandwiched layers, glass, adhesive, plexiglass and GOLD or Tin Oxide (the heating element) which effectively blocks the antenna. I've tried on several occasions on the B744, A330 and A340 to use my handheld(s) in the cockpit, and it simply will not (cannot) receive a signal.
The scumbags may have been using a GPS handheld to get Lat/Long which they inserted into the FMS.
User997 said:And to the user that suggested they used the Lat/Longs to enter into the FMS. Having never used a Boeing FMS, would this be something easily done, or would this require a bit of training on their part to be able to figure out? I can't imagine that they'd just be able to sit down and for the first time punch in some cooridnates and fly direct to them.
Yeah, probably true. But I have two observations. The first is that - and anyone who has flown anywhere near NYC or DC can tell you - these cities are NOWHERE near as impressive from the air as they are from the ground. NYC is surprisingly difficult to pick up until you're less than 20 miles away - EVEN on a clear day. DC is the same way. Being down low compounds this problem.JimNtexas said:Anyway, the hijackers were all trained pilots, they could find NYC on a clear day.
FL000 said:That was the only recorded video of the hit, and it was taken by French filmakers Jules and Gedeon Naudet, who were filming a documentary on a new firefighter recruit. Of course, the movie takes a whole new twist after the attack, and it is one of the most riveting pieces of history ever filmed. It is called simply 9/11. After the first hit, they film from inside the North Tower with exclusive access to the firefighters involved until the bitter end. I own it and watch it every so often from start to finish. It's a must see.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0312318/
I get teary eyed every time I see the inital hits. Never F'ing forget.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/wtc-people-hanging-photo5-5d-right-800h.jpg
Cpt. Underpants said:Have any of you actually TRIED to use a handheld in a 757/767/737/747/A330/A340 cockpit? I bet you haven't, because THEY DON'T WORK!
Why? The windscreens are made out of several sandwiched layers, glass, adhesive, plexiglass and GOLD or Tin Oxide (the heating element) which effectively blocks the antenna. I've tried on several occasions on the B744, A330 and A340 to use my handheld(s) in the cockpit, and it simply will not (cannot) receive a signal.
The scumbags may have been using a GPS handheld to get Lat/Long which they inserted into the FMS.
Doubtful that the pilots would have complied, and doubtful in terms of time, having heard the tapes between ATC and UAL93.Pilot124 said:It is quite possible that the hijackers forced the pilots to enter the lat/long info into the FMS before killing them.
FL000 said:Doubtful that the pilots would have complied
UnAnswerd said:Exactly. A request likes that makes their intentions crystal clear. No way would they have complied...knowing they'd likely die anyway.
I dunno. Did you ever fly around NYC while the towers were there? They didn't stand out all THAT well until you were right there - even as clear as that day was. Besides, in order for this to have been the plan they would have had to wait for a day that carried a mere forecast of clear in all locations. As I said before, forecasts are not that dependable out there. I think they were prepared to make the attack under any conditions.Makesheepnervus said:1.) VFR, As we all know the entire eastern seaboard was severe clear that day. If you fly westbound from Boston you will easily see the Hudson river from the flight levels. Turn left, and follow the river to the ocean, New York and the WTC would have stood out quite easily.
Actually, it came from the southwest (which is what I think you meant to say) after flying a big box pattern out over the middle of NJ. That smacks of some sort of precise navigational waypoint usage. That box looks to me like it's about forty to fifty miles from NYC until the final approach to the attack site. I just don't think visual navigation played a role in that attack until they were headed straight at NYC.Makesheepnervus said:The second aircraft appeared to come in from the south east, possibly following the Jersey shore northbound until sighting the NYC skyline, the second plane also had the advantage of sighting the smoke plume from the first impact.
Your question is muddled and just a shade gay...could you re-phrase it please?redd said:I do want to pose another question though, with the threat of terrorism still out there, should we be restraining ourselves from discussing the navigation topic in detail, on a public forum, does it make it easier for any future would be hijakers to get the straight scoop from pilots who actually fly the equipment?
RideTheWind said:
MGlobemaster said:Is everyone forgetting about this? I'm sure they learned to use the FMS while training in the sim. Programming the FMS is far from brain surgery. While they may not have learned everything about the FMS, all they would've needed to know how to do is insert the lat/long. I would bet that they used the handheld for exact coords. and the on-board nav. to guide the plane in. Also, with as much time and money as they dumped into flight training, I highly doubt they would've relied on the weather being strictly VFR throughout the whole ordeal.