FN FAL
Freight Dawgs Rule
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2003
- Posts
- 8,573
Thanks...looking at it now.User997 said:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks...looking at it now.User997 said:
That was the only recorded video of the hit, and it was taken by French filmakers Jules and Gedeon Naudet, who were filming a documentary on a new firefighter recruit. Of course, the movie takes a whole new twist after the attack, and it is one of the most riveting pieces of history ever filmed. It is called simply 9/11. After the first hit, they film from inside the North Tower with exclusive access to the firefighters involved until the bitter end. I own it and watch it every so often from start to finish. It's a must see.UnAnswerd said:By the way, I never knew that there was actually a video of the FIRST plane hitting the WTC.
Looking at the maps that User 997 provided, you might be on to something.MVSW said:I would put my money on a handheld gps.
With GPS units going for way less than 100 bucks at sporting goods stores, I guess I wouldn't put it past them.User997 said:Thats a good observation on the map.
Using a handheld wouldn't be that hard either, cause all you'd have to do is physically visit the site you wanted to hit, and create a custom waypoint. Then whenever your ready, go direct to that waypoint.
The only one that doesn't jive completely with that one is the Flight 175 one that took the sharp turn back towards NYX. Perhaps though well before they made that turn they could've had a visual on the building, and was then using the Hudson to line up on it.
FN FAL said:I've seen IFR students bust their ride because they played with their trimble handheld
Wrong...Trimble made a handheld called the Magellan.JimNtexas said:Seeing as Trimble never made a handheld, and hasn't made a GA GPS for years, I take it you're not exactly up on the latest technology.
Anyway, the hijackers were all trained pilots, they could find NYC on a clear day.
1994
Introduces first GPS receiver integrated on PC card
Introduces first GPS receiver to track oil spills
Introduces first GPS handheld for land navigation
Introduces first GPS receiver with built-in differential GPS beacon receiver
Introduces first true on-the-fly (OTF) initialization real-time GPS receiver with centimeter-level accuracy
Introduces world's first Window's-based earthwork estimating software
Introduces first military GPS receiver integrated with LORAN C
Introduces world's first miniature underwater military GPS receiver
As for being up on the latest technology...I'm 135 certified for GPS approaches using the KLN-89B. It might not be hollywood, but it gets the job done.JimNtexas said:Seeing as Trimble never made a handheld, and hasn't made a GA GPS for years, I take it you're not exactly up on the latest technology.
Anyway, the hijackers were all trained pilots, they could find NYC on a clear day.
User997 said:BUT, I am almost 100% confident, that when they busted in the cockpit....
redd said:
Some have even gone as far to suggest, that the flights in question, may very well have been electronically hijacked by existing US military technology, that is capable of commandeering an aircraft through computer-driven, remote recovery, rend-ering cockpit controls and communication, useless. More specifically, it would make hostages of pilots, passengers, and ³hijackers,² alike, and guarantee that certain targets would be reached, above and beyond the unpredictable dispositions and limited skill levels of ³fanatical, 20-something terrorists.² Still others have suggested, that there were various other, assembled, undercover individuals on those flights, possessing diametrically opposed, yet equally fanatical persuasions (and far superior flight training), that were involved in ³using² the Middle Eastern occupants as a ruse, to covertly assume control of the flights beyond detection - and hence blame. Their efforts were further assisted, it is claimed, by the cooperation (if not collaboration), with US intelligence agencies, the US military, and certain elements within the political establishment. If recent events, and the consideration of certain relevant news releases (i.e. the Israeli spy scandal), any indication, this interpretation may yet prove to hold much credence.
That's just plain insane...sounds like chemtrail people should at least study harder before they write this junk.KigAir said:I don't know what's worst, the people who write this stuff or the people who read and believe it.
I was using the phrase "busted in" in more of a liberal sense. It's well documented that the cockpit doors were unlocked, and perhaps even open, that day when they took control of the airplane.ultrarunner said:I would argue that in at least one instance, they didn't have to bust in.
think about that.
Cpt. Underpants said:Have any of you actually TRIED to use a handheld in a 757/767/737/747/A330/A340 cockpit? I bet you haven't, because THEY DON'T WORK!
Why? The windscreens are made out of several sandwiched layers, glass, adhesive, plexiglass and GOLD or Tin Oxide (the heating element) which effectively blocks the antenna. I've tried on several occasions on the B744, A330 and A340 to use my handheld(s) in the cockpit, and it simply will not (cannot) receive a signal.
The scumbags may have been using a GPS handheld to get Lat/Long which they inserted into the FMS.
In fact, the very same Middle Eastern hijackers, that allegedly took control of AA Flight 11, attended classes at flight schools in both Venice and Sarasota, Florida, and were trained by the very same instructors who have routinely flown world-wide missions for various Christian fundamentalist missionary services, from those very same airports and the flight schools therein. These missions have included Pat Robertson¹s ³Operation Blessing² and Jerry Falwell¹s ³World Help². Considering the eager anticipation, for certain ³biblical events² to transpire, from Evangelical figures such as these, this connection, indeed, proves to be a troubling one.
This was going to be my point EXACTLY! I've tried my handheld and it can't see through the widows if they're heated.Cpt. Underpants said:Have any of you actually TRIED to use a handheld in a 757/767/737/747/A330/A340 cockpit? I bet you haven't, because THEY DON'T WORK!
Why? The windscreens are made out of several sandwiched layers, glass, adhesive, plexiglass and GOLD or Tin Oxide (the heating element) which effectively blocks the antenna. I've tried on several occasions on the B744, A330 and A340 to use my handheld(s) in the cockpit, and it simply will not (cannot) receive a signal.
The scumbags may have been using a GPS handheld to get Lat/Long which they inserted into the FMS.