Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

heavy/double crew logging?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
takes command of the aircraft when the assigned Captain is resting. Does the IRO log PIC?

This gets debated ad nausem, being PIC (part 1) has nothing to do with logging PIC (part 61.51). If you are the sole manipulator and rated you can log PIC, this includes a F/O flying a RJ flight from Mooseballs Wyoming to Pigsnuckle Arkansas. 99.9% of the airlines will not accept this for employment purposes (and why they specifically state this on their apps as it is in contravention of how the FAA views it) but as far as the FAA is concerned that is how it works. There are numerous rulings from FAA Chief Counsel clearly stating this (plus close to 9000 posts on these forums).

ATP who signs for the plane logs everything even when he is sleeping.
Everyone else logs when they occupy a crew member station.

Do some searches on the topic and you will find all the supporting rulings and FAR's.
 
the Master (Captain) of a ship out at sea is the captain ALL of the time, whether he's asleep, at the helm or eating dinner..
 
Hey, not trying to be an FAA lawyer, just trying to use a little common sense in light of defense of time in an interview, since that's what this is really all about. I can't argue against what appears to be a legality per FARs to log every hour, including those in the bunk, as PIC if you are the assigned Captain. However, an IRO is an ersatz Captain, and takes command of the aircraft when the assigned Captain is resting. Does the IRO log PIC? I'll guess a bunch of IROs have. However, playing devil's advocate, you can't have two people in command, can you? My opinion only: I agree with birddog. Based on the extremely poorly worded and defined guidance, if you are an FO, log the time in a seat as SIC and time in a bunk as 'other'. It all can still go on a resume, but pay close attention to the actual application's definitions in reporting your time. Each company seems to have their idea of what they're interested in hearing.
I am on my 7th job in 2.5 years. I have been on multiple interviews. I logged SIC for the entire flight except for the portion that I was sitting in the left seat. I logged left seat time as IRO (not pic). I have never been questioned about it during interviews from low cost carriers to legacies (Delta). It's when you start trying to log PIC time while sitting in the left seat that it causes questions to be asked. Most companies specify that PIC is when you sign for the aircraft.
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^What he said!


If the regulation required you to be there, log it all in TT. If you want to stay out of trouble with the nit pickers log it all as SIC if are a FO/IRO. If you wish, log a separate column as IRO, ie you are relieving the Captain. BUT YOU BETTER BE READY TO DEFIND IT IN AN INTERVIEW. See there, now you just made an interview a confrontation for no reason. No one is going to give you more credibility because you made position reports from the left seat. WTF?

The Captain logs all the time as PIC, even sleeping. UNLESS, you are working for one of the few companies that the IRO signs into and out of the logbook and release as PIC when the Captain goes to the bunk. Even then when I was the IRO, I still logged it all as FO.

Never any splaning to do. KISS.
 
Log 2/3 of the block, don't log PIC unless you are released as PIC. If you are released as PIC it would be ok to log it all (my opinion only). Personally I didn't log third crew member time not building time anymore.
 
Last edited:
That third (or fourth) crewmember is required for the ac to leave the gate if it is more than 8 or more than 12 hours.....I just dont see it as a 2/3 required crewmember.
 
That third (or fourth) crewmember is required for the ac to leave the gate if it is more than 8 or more than 12 hours.....I just dont see it as a 2/3 required crewmember.

When is that crew member required though? If the plane takes off and has to return 30 minutes due to emergency what was the requirement for additional crew members?

The regulations are clear in this regard, when that 3rd or 4th crew member in a 2 pilot aircraft is required through rest rules to occupy a crew member position (which isn't a chair in back sleeping) they can log time. The ATP operating as PIC under Part 1 gets to log everything, everyone else logs when they are at a station.
 
When is that crew member required though? If the plane takes off and has to return 30 minutes due to emergency what was the requirement for additional crew members?

The regulations are clear in this regard, when that 3rd or 4th crew member in a 2 pilot aircraft is required through rest rules to occupy a crew member position (which isn't a chair in back sleeping) they can log time. The ATP operating as PIC under Part 1 gets to log everything, everyone else logs when they are at a station.

The crewmember is required for the a/c to be dispatched, therefore required for the entire flight. He/she isn't magically required at the 8 hr mark...
 
When is that crew member required though? If the plane takes off and has to return 30 minutes due to emergency what was the requirement for additional crew members?
Yes, because the flight couldn't be dispatched in the first place without the dispatch release and that requires that the intended flight be in regulatory compliance. If they had to return and say they blew some tires and ran off the runway, then the feds get involved. If the aircraft didn't have enough pilots for the intended flight, I am pretty sure that the FAA would have an issue with this.

Don't chicken and egg this!;)
 
Interesting logic going on here. Why not log all passenger time too? After all, passenger airplanes wouldn't fly or even exist if if passengers weren't around. The ongoing debate over PIC time is not because the FAR's are unclear. It's because for some inexplicable reason most airlines won't accept civilian "sole manipulator" time as PIC time. But, they happily accept military First Pilot time, which is exactly the same thing.
 
It's because for some inexplicable reason most airlines won't accept civilian "sole manipulator" time as PIC time. But, they happily accept military First Pilot time, which is exactly the same thing.

:confused: Sounds like your experience w/ military FP time is a bit different than mine.
I logged quite a few FP hours in a single seat F-15A during my initial RTU training. I had a set of AF wings on, signed for the jet and mo' definitely was the PIC. I just wasn't a full-up mission ready F-15 pilot, so my time was logged as FP, not MP time in A-forms.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom