Pay for training v. pay for training
Ace757 said:
Infact we have all paid for training. We all paid for our ratings weather it be at an academy or an FBO.
Let's differentiate between earning your ratings and paying for training. It might sound the same, but it is not.
First off, absent someone who is willing to let you use his/her airplane and provide instruction gratis, in order to acquire their basic credentials, i.e. Commercial-Instrument, CFI, etc., everyone must rent an airplane in some form or another and pay an instructor to teach him/her. I'm not counting military in this equation because that is a different situation. The same is true if you become a doctor, lawyer, engineer, municipal planner, or whatever. You attend some sort of school or training program, for which you pay tuition, purchase books and materials, pay lab fees, etc., and you earn credentials, e.g. college degrees, that are accepted universally. That is earning your ratings, or degree, as the case may be.
With pay-for-training,
you must remit money to the company for the training that it will provide to you as a condition of employment. This training is specific to the company and does not result in a universally-accepted credential. If you choose not to pay the company for your training, you will not be given employment. Hence, the difference between paying to earn your ratings and paying a company to train you as a condition of employment.
I agree with Timebuilder's comment about bribery. That's what it really boils down to.
Hope that helps with your understanding of P-F-T.