Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

GOJET to do Delta flying!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Had we been ONE streamlined airline with no redundancy instead of *SkyWest + ASA* under a shell game of a holding company with $redundancy$, would this have happened? How much does it cost to have two CEOs, two headquarters, 2X etc, 2X etc, etc. Now we have a bad situation for ASA/ExpressJet and SkyWest Airlines.

Food for thought.


Couldn't agree more. The almighty Jerry may of made a mistake on this. But when its comes down to it ASA will always be more expensive then a Gojet or Mesa. We've been around a long time and have a senior pilot group. The only way we're going to keep flying or gain more is if we have a superior product. And obviously we don't. At ASA the line employees are never given the resources to provide a good product.(staffing, poor crew utilization, mtx etc..) As long as there are contracts to bid on there's always going to be newer regionals to bottom feed. Especially ones like Gojets with a less then reputable pilot group. Being a career regional pilot you deserve evertything coming to you. Don't be surprised when the doors finally close. Just like Comair. ASA could be next or we could take pay cuts?! Right Joe?
 
Was told they will be operated at a 1% loss. Had our performance not have sucked as bad as it did this summer maybe big D would have let this one slide.
 
Was told they will be operated at a 1% loss. Had our performance not have sucked as bad as it did this summer maybe big D would have let this one slide.

And the fallacy of performance making a difference continues...it's Delta: cheap is all that matters, performance is literally the very last thing that makes any difference at all. The only time it comes into play is when DL can shave money off contracts through penalties.
 
1. Regarding this being because we have 2 separate managements and 2 sets of executives: You do realize that this was awarded to a company that has 3 separate managements and 3 separate companies....That didn't make them too expensive.

2. Regarding this being "performance" based, GoJets has some serious mx. issues...We are far better than them in terms of quality.

This was based on overall cost....Delta doesn't want to pay much for regional lift...
 
Was told they will be operated at a 1% loss. Had our performance not have sucked as bad as it did this summer maybe big D would have let this one slide.

GoJets is worse than us in many areas...This was done on a pure low cost basis.
 
Good news is that hopefully GoJets will hire ex Comair guys to fly them

They can start with the ex-Comair guys who are probably about to be furloughed from ASA. It hasn't been announced and I hope I'm wrong, but even with running this place so lean this summer I can't imagine we can lose 14 aircraft and not furlough again. Maybe they'll make an 11th hour deal on the 6 200s, but I doubt it.
 
1. Regarding this being because we have 2 separate managements and 2 sets of executives: You do realize that this was awarded to a company that has 3 separate managements and 3 separate companies....That didn't make them too expensive.

This was based on overall cost....Delta doesn't want to pay much for regional lift...

No, I get it. But what worked for us before doesn't work now. What works for them (GoJet & co.) is irrelevant. The bottom line is dollars and cents. Our big guns could lay in our economy of scale...but INC doesn't use it to the full potential.

For years, ASA pilots were flying on a 5 year past-due contract with low(er) maintenance aircraft. It worked in ASA's favor THEN, not now. Now, we have relatively more lifers/super-senior pilots on a current contract (and i'm not saying there's anything wrong with lifers...whole other topic) and ratty, old, mainenance-hog airplanes.

We can't compete with the low costs of younger pilot groups, but we can in other areas.

Costs change and so MUST strategy. The honeymoon is over. Time to evolve.

For the record, you're spot on about DL's interests. It's all about the dividends.
 
Last edited:
1. Regarding this being because we have 2 separate managements and 2 sets of executives: You do realize that this was awarded to a company that has 3 separate managements and 3 separate companies....That didn't make them too expensive.

2. Regarding this being "performance" based, GoJets has some serious mx. issues...We are far better than them in terms of quality.

This was based on overall cost....Delta doesn't want to pay much for regional lift...

1. When it comes to their 3 managements it doesn't matter if there is 3 or 1 when your only dealing with 90+ airplanes. To combined all 3 it doesn't make a difference, maybe save a little. Now when the operation is 700 airplanes then yes it would save money to combine it. Saving that money would then allow INC to bid on flying at a lower cost and still make money. Jerry's fear/inexperience of unionized labor got the best of him here. To bad he couldn't look at SWA and see how it could work.

2. Agreed its about money. But gojet also has better proformance then us. Sorry to say. If you look on the UA side they have better numbers then us.

Long story short, ASA is to expensive and has a poor product. And its not the line employee's fault.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top