Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Gojet getting 50 seaters!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Register   Log in
In other words YOU ARE NOT WELCOME ON MESABA!![/quote]



..and vise versa.
 
flyboyzii said:
In other words YOU ARE NOT WELCOME ON MESABA!!
Click to expand...



..and vise versa.[/quote]
Fortunately they will not be be affected, as everywhere that Hojets serves is flown to by many other regionals.

Being denied a Go-Jets jumpseat is like a hooker with aids not giving you the half and half.
 
siucavflight said:
..and vise versa.
Click to expand...
Fortunately they will not be be affected, as everywhere that Hojets serves is flown to by many other regionals.

Being denied a Go-Jets jumpseat is like a hooker with aids not giving you the half and half.[/quote]

.....you should know about hookers. The towel covered kind
 
Doesn't SKW have several 200's sitting on the ramp doing nothing? Sure would make more sense to let SKW do that flying rather than bring another a/c onto a $hitty airline.
 
Emergency meeting sounds scarey.

Tough break
 
This absolutely makes no sense. Let me get this straight, basically, GJ will now be flying UA 50 seaters? While TSA is flying 50 seaters? The GJ union will not allow this, they are against any flying that will affect TSA 50 seat flying, I know it's hard to imagine. Not to mention ALPA. If the GJ contract validates this move as "legal", that GJ essentialy can replace TSA, then where the F was TSA in 2005 negotiations!!

It could be that the company is merging but instead of GJ becoming TSA, it's going to be the other way around.
 
flyboyzii said:
Fortunately they will not be be affected, as everywhere that Hojets serves is flown to by many other regionals.

Being denied a Go-Jets jumpseat is like a hooker with aids not giving you the half and half.
Click to expand...

.....you should know about hookers. The towel covered kind[/quote]

And you should learn how to quote properly.

And not one hooker in Dubai wore a towel!

CX880 said:
This absolutely makes no sense. Let me get this straight, basically, GJ will now be flying UA 50 seaters? While TSA is flying 50 seaters? The GJ union will not allow this, they are against any flying that will affect TSA 50 seat flying, I know it's hard to imagine. Not to mention ALPA. If the GJ contract validates this move as "legal", that GJ essentialy can replace TSA, then where the F was TSA in 2005 negotiations!!

It could be that the company is merging but instead of GJ becoming TSA, it's going to be the other way around.
Click to expand...
Yes you are right, GJ pilots would never do anything to screw over the fellow pilots.
 
flyboyzii said:
Fortunately they will not be be affected, as everywhere that Hojets serves is flown to by many other regionals.

Being denied a Go-Jets jumpseat is like a hooker with aids not giving you the half and half.
Click to expand...

.....you should know about hookers. The towel covered kind[/quote]

Racist.
 
Get the facts correct guys first of all.!!!!

No dog in fight !!!

TSA pilots had chance to go to GoJets when opened=Most Said HEL$ NO....we will stick it to the company...

GoJet started because TSA flew for AA which stated they could not fly anything larger than 50ers at that time!! United wanted 700's so TSA formed GoJets to get the United business.

Listen, there are people on the street like myself..that can not longer support the family on unemployment. So if people can find a job, or if you don't want yours anymore=THAN QUIT !!!!!

Prater is a joke so is ALPA !!! Look at DL and NW=ALPA can not even go by their own bylaws !!!
 
scarlet said:
Get the facts correct guys first of all.!!!!

No dog in fight !!!

TSA pilots had chance to go to GoJets when opened=Most Said HEL$ NO....we will stick it to the company...

GoJet started because TSA flew for AA which stated they could not fly anything larger than 50ers at that time!! United wanted 700's so TSA formed GoJets to get the United business.

Listen, there are people on the street like myself..that can not longer support the family on unemployment. So if people can find a job, or if you don't want yours anymore=THAN QUIT !!!!!

Prater is a joke so is ALPA !!! Look at DL and NW=ALPA can not even go by their own bylaws !!!
Click to expand...

I think I missed the point here....
 
scarlet said:
Get the facts correct guys first of all.!!!!

No dog in fight !!!

TSA pilots had chance to go to GoJets when opened=Most Said HEL$ NO....we will stick it to the company...

GoJet started because TSA flew for AA which stated they could not fly anything larger than 50ers at that time!! United wanted 700's so TSA formed GoJets to get the United business.

Listen, there are people on the street like myself..that can not longer support the family on unemployment. So if people can find a job, or if you don't want yours anymore=THAN QUIT !!!!!

Prater is a joke so is ALPA !!! Look at DL and NW=ALPA can not even go by their own bylaws !!!
Click to expand...
When chataqua had to get around scope at AA they created RAH, they allowed pilots from Chataqua to transfer to RAH, TSA pilots did not have that option at GJ, instead if they were to go over they would have to go as new hires.
 
scarlet said:
Get the facts correct guys first of all.!!!!

No dog in fight !!!

TSA pilots had chance to go to GoJets when opened=Most Said HEL$ NO....we will stick it to the company...

GoJet started because TSA flew for AA which stated they could not fly anything larger than 50ers at that time!! United wanted 700's so TSA formed GoJets to get the United business.

Listen, there are people on the street like myself..that can not longer support the family on unemployment. So if people can find a job, or if you don't want yours anymore=THAN QUIT !!!!!

Prater is a joke so is ALPA !!! Look at DL and NW=ALPA can not even go by their own bylaws !!!
Click to expand...



I was at TSA when all of this happened. Now remember, the union leader told us all to vote down the offer for TSA pilots to capture this flying and the company said this is our final and only offer. So what happened, the pilots voted it down. The MEC promised to get more for the pilots and when he went back to the company to negociate, the company said nope, that was our final offer. Then about 3 weeks later, the MEC chairman went crawling back to the company and said he wanted the deal for the GoJet flying and would except the companies offer. Well, the company said ok be we need concessions from the pilot group,so it never happened. Now tell me wouldn't it of been better to capture the GoJet flying when you had the chance but the pilots followed the worthless union we had at the time and turned it down. It would of been better to get the planes on property and get a better payscale on the next contract then not have them at all.

The TSA pilots have nobody to blame except for themselves for not getting this flying.

Now tell me, how many of those pilots that voted no, would change their vote to yes now?
 
siucavflight said:
When chataqua had to get around scope at AA they created RAH, they allowed pilots from Chataqua to transfer to RAH, TSA pilots did not have that option at GJ, instead if they were to go over they would have to go as new hires.
Click to expand...


Wrong, they were allowed to go over and keep their longevity from flying at TSA and not start as newhires. Every pilot got a memo in their mailboxes explaining that to them if they went over. Get you facts correct before you post.
 
wjpilot said:
Wrong, they were allowed to go over and keep their longevity from flying at TSA and not start as newhires. Every pilot got a memo in their mailboxes explaining that to them if they went over. Get you facts correct before you post.
Click to expand...
I believe that you are incorrect. IF in fact I am wrong, and they were all allowed to go over with their longevity then it will seriously change my opinion of Go-Jets.
 

Share this page

Latest posts

Latest resources

Latest media

Carbon Cub FX-3 Shenandoah Valley
Carbon Cub at Kittyhawk
FX-3 in the backcountry
IFR Panel in a Carbon Cub FX-3
Cub-Provo-UT-c.jpg
Back
Top