Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bob, not that I think you bring any good discussion to the table,
Oh good, Bob "Swingline" Dylan is back.
How did that go again, Kharma? "Skip... skip... skip..." lol![]()
What if GK decides having a second airline with cheaper costs is easier to grow?
Isn't it best for the employees at both airlines to be "combined" as soon as possible? What if GK decides having a second airline with cheaper costs is easier to grow? All this talk about about culture, but what what I'm hearing from several SWA pilots on this board is that SWA is becoming more "legacy" like every day. I sincerely hope that SWA management is still as touchy feely as some claim the are.
Isn't it best for the employees at both airlines to be "combined" as soon as possible? What if GK decides having a second airline with cheaper costs is easier to grow? All this talk about about culture, but what what I'm hearing from several SWA pilots on this board is that SWA is becoming more "legacy" like every day. I sincerely hope that SWA management is still as touchy feely as some claim the are.
Greed? I'm simply expecting it to be a fair INTEGRATION. That does NOT equal a staple and almost every, single Southwest pilot on here has said so as well (with two notable exceptions). Two. That's it. Everyone else on the SOUTHWEST side isn't expecting a staple, either. So if we say the same thing, that's greed?It's absolutely shocking to me to witness how blinded you guys are by greed. Shocking!
A week may go by before you post (I'm assuming because of your schedule), but by post count, you post just as much as any other, regular poster in these threads and you say the same thing, over and over again.I don't comment on these threads often, but if these comments from the CEO of SWA are true, I think that is a pretty big clue about what is going to happen.
Per the SWAPA contract, SL6 to be specific, GK can't add 1 aircraft to AirTran unless he maintains a 3.61 to 1 of operational SWA aircraft to AirTran's total aircraft. Operational aircraft for SWA must be flying scheduled service and not maintenance spares or parked in the desert. The 3.61:1 ratio must be maintained until the 2 companies are combined. So basically GK can't grow AirTran unless he grows SWA at 3.61 times the rate.What if GK decides having a second airline with cheaper costs is easier to grow?
How is that some of you will say senoirity is everything, but hey you AAI guys should give up ALL of yours for a big paycheck.
...as opposed to SWA guys, who should presumably give up our seniority for nada?![]()
If you "gave" the AirTran pilot staight relative seniority you still have lost nothing as AirTran pilots are bring a 140 aircraft with them.
...as opposed to SWA guys, who should presumably give up our seniority for nada?![]()
Actually, you gain a delayed upgrade. SWA F/Os will lose career earnings due to this. My loss is about 5% over my career for total earnings. Seeing that every AT pilot gains no less than 30% in career earnings my vote is against relative seniority.
That didn't seem to matter in any of the recent arbitration hearings. Each losing side had that defense.
Bobby, you're an idiot. Not even the most militant SWA guys think they are going to get a staple . . . but here's good ol' Bobby, looking about as "with it" as Dennis Kucinich.
Try this again. What has a Southwest pilot lost, not what an AirTran pilot has gained.After more than a dozen threads and hundreds of posts on the subject, if you still can't (or won't) see the windfall a straight relative seniority integration would be for the AirTran pilots, I'm not going to try and educate you.