I believe that the pilots should be taken. ASA pilots are competent professionals and first class aviators. Flying jets in and out of busy hubs all day is airline pilot flying, period.
But the question is how would those pilots be taken. Personally, here's my view if you're talking ASA and Delta, which is the prevailing example in this discussion:
Staple all ASA pilots to the bottom of the Delta pilot's seniority list for equipment bidding.
ASA pilots keep their present status quo for the RJ flying they do.
All ASA pilots would get seniority based opportunities to 100% of all Delta new hire positions. If exercised, they would start over as a year 1 pilot at year 1 pay and seniority at Delta. If they chose to stay, they would keep all they have earned for the equipment they fly.
All pilots would keep DOH for furlough considerations, and if either side of the company needed to furlough, they would furlough from the bottom of either respective list. Although there would be one list, there would be a dividing line in that list. The outsource experiment abortion is too big and too ugly to ever be solved by one sweeping final solution at this point. A dividing line in one contract is the only way for it to ever happen.
All new hires for Delta or ASA would go to the bottom of ASA's list. They would then get their chance to transition to the Delta side of the line when they could hold it, if they chose to hold it.
Any Delta pilot that was furloughed would automatically be entitled to go back to the bottom of the ASA list, keeping their Delta longevity for pay but only bidding what they could hold at ASA as a new hire.
In short, not officially a B scale, but a workable solution that recognises the realities of our current situation, especially frst admitting there is a problem.
Later in subsequent contracts, efforts could be made to transition to a seamless single seniority list. In no case should an ASA pilot ever be able to use their ASA seniority to bid ahead of any Delta pilot in planes the ASA pilot didn't otherwise have the opportunity to fly for the company in question.
Is that the only workable solution, or will 100% of everyone be happy about it? Of course not. Another solution is for the Delta pilots to take back 90, then 70, then 50 seat flying as they are able to bargain for it. That would probably be more costly for them short term of course.
But no matter what happens, or doesn't happen, you have to first acknowledge that you have no leverage whatsoever to claim anything othet than your share of whatever flying ASA happens to offer you today. You will have to first committ to a staple, and THEN worry about how to work out the details, not the other way around, as was previouslly attempted by the PID------>RJDC.
Or you could embrace the status quo, comfortable that your ASA seniority will afford you pay and QOL and one more market cycle of furlough protection. But next cycle, will ASA have any flying to offer you? Is that even up to ASA? Will SkyWest give ASA some of UNited's or Delta's flying next time around? Will Delta give SkyWest Delta's flying next time around? Are those 70 and 90 seater opportunities "yours"? You sure about that?