Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Flops Randomly *terminating* Many Pilots !beware!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Archiving Tonker's post in case it decides to edit/delete

Archiving Tonker's post in case it decides to edit/delete

Alright, I took over my husband's FI acct yes. I did not read his previous posts as I didn't feel they applied to the questions that I have today. That was from 4 years ago... Do you really think that with time and age that opinions or situations do not change???

If you don't grow with age, then I feel bad for you.

This is so key because "she" admitted right here on the board that she is not the account holder, so doesn't that admission go against board rules and require account suspension until the account holder can be verified? I know I wouldn't want someone else (even a spouse) speaking for me on "my" account.....
Mods? We have a troll here on aisle TONKER and SKANZA....
 
I will tell ya what, IF I really wanted the immature juvenile, underdog mindset that this board apparently shares I would have played a game of Monopoly with my kids... Archive away.

Nowhere was I derogatory to the Union in my initial post or any following, I said this BOARD was a High School Clique with all the judgments and criticism passed and all (*save a few people, that truly seem genuine*) have done nothing for your age, maturity level, or honest devotion to the Union other than bashing! It appears misery enjoys company and apparently that is why you all get together here (union or non-union).

I am not going to allow myself to be bullied by people that are doing nothing but A$$uming my identity, my intentions, or genuinely honest questions, and trying to butcher all of the above. If I want further assistance I will seek it outside of this site and speak to a human so that they see an individual and will answer legit questions with out the hassle. When they can look me in the eye and know how genuine I am, apparently that is the only way I can get honest answers with out all of the back handed comments.

Yet again, NOT derogatory to the Union... just to the individuals that are so condescending and higher up than I will ever choose to personally go. I prefer to stay grounded and real even on a bulletin board!

Also, there is a difference between skepticism and just down right bullying as done by some.

I will clarify again: NOT B19 or his Wife whom I learned of this morning…. (Sorry not reading through 2 mil postings on this thing to understand and personally know everyone).
 
Last edited:
Tonker, in the time that you took to write that post, you could have PM'd NJW. Did you?
 
No mail here, yet. :confused: It will be easy for me and I have an excellent reputation for going out of my way to help those who post here. All I need is her husband's name and the Union leader that I, or my husband, contacts will take it from there. Simple process and a great opportunity for someone seeking to understand the Union. NJW
 
Leave it to the FLOPS....:rolleyes: to unjustly fire pilots supposedly for productivity problems and then prove that they're unable to meet the needs of the owners with regularly scheduled pilots. What hypocrites! Their deliberate penny wise, pound foolish/do more with less thinking results in fatigued pilots yet they make safety a sales pitch...:rolleyes: Super-hypocrite status! :mad:


No.... in the fractional world it's cheaper to pay overtime than pay full time pilots. No training, no taxes, no SSI etc. etc. Basic business.


The Options pilots have a chance to send a message loud and clear to management regarding their treatment of pilots and the hypocritical requests. Not just no, but hell no! At this point agreeing to fly overtime would delay your contract and be hugely offensive to the entire pilotgroup, particularly the contract hostages. Kudos to you, Sky, and to the other Ops pilots standing firm.

Another way for the union is placing a negative impact and creating massive internal and unrepairable turmoil at Flight Options. Kudos to that 64%!

THE LYING HYPOCRITES AT FLIGHTOPS SHOULD BE GIVEN THE BOOT STARTING WITH SHEERINGA

You need the boot more than him. Oh.. that's right, you can't get the boot... you don't even work in the industry.

YOUR UNION IS ALL THAT IS STANDING BETWEEN YOU AND MISTREATMENT FROM MANAGEMENT.

The management is not mistreating anybody, they are simply reacting to the union rhetoric.


You don't know a thing about business, do you?
 
Update

Tonker, in the time that you took to write that post, you could have PM'd NJW. Did you?

Mrs Tonker PMed me last night to thank me for my offer to put her in touch with an 1108 leader, but she prefers to do research on her own. She did express more support for the Union in her PM than she did in her posts. I have offered to answer questions and told her my original offer will remain should she change her mind. I had a few questions for her, too. Hopefully, she will answer them. This is the first opportunity I've had to exchange views with an Options wife. Should be interesting.... NJW
 
Mrs Tonker PMed me last night to thank me for my offer to put her in touch with an 1108 leader, but she prefers to do research on her own. She did express more support for the Union in her PM than she did in her posts. I have offered to answer questions and told her my original offer will remain should she change her mind. I had a few questions for her, too. Hopefully, she will answer them. This is the first opportunity I've had to exchange views with an Options wife. Should be interesting.... NJW

I haven't solicited her PM like you have, but she really needs to see both sides of the coin, not just your slanted pro-union propaganda.
 
I wonder how B19 makes every one of his posts display a POST COUNT of "666"?
 
The management is not mistreating anybody, they are simply reacting to the union rhetoric.
Really.....so what is your explanation for how management was acting for the 2 years before a union was voted in? There was no union rhetoric or even a union to react to.
 
From B19

"The management is not mistreating anybody, they are simply reacting to the union rhetoric."

That will help in the lawsuit.
 
I wonder how B19 makes every one of his posts display a POST COUNT of "666"?

Hopefully not much; they haven't made much sense or brought about any credibility. I imagine it's part of the F&H union busting package though, no specific amount per post, just some intern trying to impress the higher ups.
 
"The management is not mistreating anybody, they are simply reacting to the union rhetoric."

That will help in the lawsuit.

Which one, the one where pilots claim they were wrongfully terminated or the one where the company will sue the union for breaking airplanes needlessly to delay flights?

The precident will be for the latter.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom