Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Flexjet

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Flex was always a good place to work, even though they pissed me off every now and then. They wonder why they score so low on communication, well this is it. This will haunt employee moral for a long time. I know I hadn't forgotten the crappy deal 3 years ago, and I thought about that with each survey. I don't know how we went from the E-Mail on the 7th of May, (things are doing great, ahead of budget on every thing except live hours, down 4 or 5%). Now 22 days later, gloom and doom e-mail. Then on the 5th we are firing an unknown number of employs you'll knownby Friday. I still a little bit stunned. Oh well, it was fun while it lasted
 
Flex was always a good place to work, even though they pissed me off every now and then. They wonder why they score so low on communication, well this is it. This will haunt employee moral for a long time. I know I hadn't forgotten the crappy deal 3 years ago, and I thought about that with each survey. I don't know how we went from the E-Mail on the 7th of May, (things are doing great, ahead of budget on every thing except live hours, down 4 or 5%). Now 22 days later, gloom and doom e-mail. Then on the 5th we are firing an unknown number of employs you'll knownby Friday. I still a little bit stunned. Oh well, it was fun while it lasted

That is why we think there is something else in play here. When you right size a company this fast there is only 3 things it could be: (Keep in mind we are understaffed by 6 pilots and there will be no downgrades.)

1: Incompetent Management wanted to just rip the bandaid quickly to minimize blowback from a long drawn out "excuse".

2: Make the company lean just prior to a merger

3: Accounting screwed something up or someone stealing from the company, i.e. and/or "cooking the books".
 
Last edited:
7 early retirements
22 let go from the bottom
6 other pilot spots to remain unfilled
2 Flex Canada
10 from the Waterview

....and we have to wait until Monday to find out what the almighty hurry was.


Someone please explain the hurry on Monday, if they explain.
 
The explanation we got on the "hurry" was that Fred made the mistake of just waiting til the last minute. Not really an answer but basically was saying that he didn't think it through well enough. Well, I'm not buying it. I hate to be that conspiracy person but, this whole thing smells of a sale. They can deny that all they want and, they will deny it if it is true so, we won't know until the night prior---kind of like the layoffs.
 
The rumor that I heard is that NJA wants to buy a bunch of CL30s, but they also want a no-compete clause written into the deal. Of course, this is all "hush-hush". If this comes to fruition, it'll essentially be a death blow to FJ. Hopefully it's just a rumor.
 
It could be a death blow if they allow that clause; however, Flexjet's response would be the 85. I highly doubt there is a no compete clause though. Number one, has that ever happened? Number two, why would Bombardier accept a deal to where they would only ever sell that plane to one company? That would be stupid on their part; however, I have seen crazier things at this place.
 
just learned that NJA got a no-compete clause with their deal on the Globals. I think that it's pretty likely that they also got one with their deal on the Challengers. Time will only tell...
 
just learned that NJA got a no-compete clause with their deal on the Globals. I think that it's pretty likely that they also got one with their deal on the Challengers. Time will only tell...

You are wrong. That would mean we cease to exist as of today and we got word from the REAL CEO on our "status" as a company as it relates to Bombardier so, nice guess but you're wrong.
 
just learned that NJA got a no-compete clause with their deal on the Globals. I think that it's pretty likely that they also got one with their deal on the Challengers. Time will only tell...

let me guess, a "reliable source" told you that?
 
just learned that NJA got a no-compete clause with their deal on the Globals. I think that it's pretty likely that they also got one with their deal on the Challengers. Time will only tell...
We were told point blank by our soon to be ex-CEO that CiatationAir is leaving the fractional and jet card business because our largest competitor is our parent company's largest customer. We are all pawns, CA and Flex. Free market capitalist they say they are!. bs
 
It could be a death blow if they allow that clause; however, Flexjet's response would be the 85. I highly doubt there is a no compete clause though. Number one, has that ever happened? Number two, why would Bombardier accept a deal to where they would only ever sell that plane to one company? That would be stupid on their part; however, I have seen crazier things at this place.

That is true, but keep in mind, orders are very different from deliveries. I'd be surprised if Bombardier did this also.
 
You are wrong. That would mean we cease to exist as of today and we got word from the REAL CEO on our "status" as a company as it relates to Bombardier so, nice guess but you're wrong.

It could mean we honor the contracts and then shrink into the Citation Air model.

It could me they will continue to support us until someone buys us.

I don't trust a word any of them have to say. A letter saying that Bombardier will continue to support carries little weight in light of the recent order.

And who can blame them for doing it? It's not like FJ has the will, leadership or plan to grow out brand beyond some tiresome "amazing owner service" tripe.

Just who are we surveying for those positive answers I wonder btw? Probably our own owners and transfers from other programs. No possibility of confirmation bias there.
 
You are wrong. That would mean we cease to exist as of today and we got word from the REAL CEO on our "status" as a company as it relates to Bombardier so, nice guess but you're wrong.
Join the club. CA is the founding member.
 
Aren't you guys adding a bunch of Lear 70s, 75s and 85s in the next 2-3 years? I don't get why you think this big Netjets order will lead to your extinction?

Can someone enlighten me on that logic considering your current large CL300 fleet and all of the new inbound Lears?
 
It could be a death blow if they allow that clause; however, Flexjet's response would be the 85. I highly doubt there is a no compete clause though. Number one, has that ever happened? Number two, why would Bombardier accept a deal to where they would only ever sell that plane to one company? That would be stupid on their part; however, I have seen crazier things at this place.

The non compete means that they can't sell the a/c to another fractional.

You know...something really stinks here if all the fog contains mostly truth. NJ has made a lot of announcements regarding a/c they were buying...but they never took delivery of. :rolleyes:

You don't suppose they are pushing CA and Flex out of business by placing these orders, getting the manufacturers to close down their frax, and then not take the a/c do you? :eek:

Fractionals and a/c manufacturers are both desperate these days and my guess somebody is trying to pull a Rockerfeller here by pushing the competition out the door.

A much better move than buying the competition. In this case they go away and you at least have a brand new a/c.;)
 
Aren't you guys adding a bunch of Lear 70s, 75s and 85s in the next 2-3 years? I don't get why you think this big Netjets order will lead to your extinction?

Can someone enlighten me on that logic considering your current large CL300 fleet and all of the new inbound Lears?

Extinction seems unlikely. Becoming an endangered species is entirely possible. The short answer is that we're being marginalized. We now offer nothing that our main competitor can't duplicate, and probably do better with. The Lears make us pocket money. The 300 is our bread and butter.

We keep hearing about our service being the difference. I don't see it. We're playing Subway to NJ's Quizno's. Same basic product, but one has a much better finish, and no one really cares how much the person at the register smiles if the other place offers the better meal.

And speaking of those newfangled lear replacements, any NJ's guy can tell you that ordering planes and actually getting planes on property are two different things.
 
So, I'm a relatively young guy, years from retirement and I'm thinking to myself "d'oh"!

I wonder how many of our older guys are feeling foolish for not taking the early out plan now.

A key indicator for what's going on, whether we're for sale or being knowingly driven out of the marketplace will be whether or not they offer it again here in a few weeks. Bet we get a lot of takers then... Maybe I'll even be one of them...
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top