Don't make the mistake of thinking that because you have the performance and ice capabilities of a larger, more powerful airplane, that it's okay to go into the ice. Any ice system is designed to get you out of ice, not in. Even in the highest performance aircraft, icing conditions exist which far exceed the capability of any anti icing or deicing system that mankind has devised, or can build, not to mention the capability of any aircraft one may care to mention.
I've heard posters here comment on how this airplane or that carries ice like a pickup truck. Garbage. No airplane carries ice well. Don't get caught into that mentality. I was nearly dumbfounded at the hysterically idiotic ramblings of tdturbo regarding ice in light airplanes; I really thought he had more sense than that. It's possibly excusable in an inexperienced pilot such as himself, but weather is no rspecter of persons, and ice does not forgive.
Ice is dangerous on runways, on wings, in fuel, everywhere. The only place for ice in the airplane is in the galley or in your soda glass. In light airplanes, especially, the only thing icing experience should provide you is a firm commitment to stay clear. Ice has brought down more than a few large, highly powered aircraft.
You might be willing to fly ice in a G4. You might look before you do that at the building evidence regarding the recent loss of the Challenger in Montrose before you plan on tackling ice merely because you have the power and the alleged performance to do so. Not a good idea. I'm very, very disappointed at the number of posters who seem to see ice as a training tool or something that is to be carried well by a particular type design. I'm gratified to see the much greater number of posters to are wise enough to properly advise steering clear of ice in any amount.
Leave ice in drinks and to the olympics. Inside the airplane, fine. Outside the airplane, very bad.