Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Fired - Need Advice

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

PilotBTS1972

Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Posts
9
I recently completed training at a well known regional. I passed both my oral and checkride on my first attempt, however, busted my IOE line check for having to go-around on a visual approach due to an early base turn which resulted in me being high on final. I did have some extra time in IOE, but it was nothing out of the ordinary. The airline asked me to resign as a result of this bust. Since then, I cannot seem to get on with another regional and have been forced back into flight instruction. I am afraid that this scar has ruined my career. Granted, I am low time (920 TT, 150 ME), but I'm worried that I may never get on with another regional. Any advice from people with similar experiences.

As an aside, the airline I was with recently formed an alter-ego carrier and has been treating their pilots like dirt. I let everyone guess which regional I'm talking about.
 
I don't know why, but I don't think you just told the whole truth, which will make it hard for anyone to give you any advice.

Failing for initiating a go-around after conducting an unstable approach?

There has GOT to be more to it than that.
 
I'm with Jim, that sounds like it may have been the last problem, not the first. Airlines don't like to dump 20K into training you and then show you the door for no apparent reason. And IOE is a wierd place in the training process to get the boot. Extra IOE time IS out of the ordinary, line flying is the easiest part of airline aviation. Did anybody talk about trouble with the "big picture," "situational awareness," that kind of thing? That's what seems to be the case if problems manifest so late in the game. You can train a monkey to fly an ILS and recite memory items, but integrating skills and information quickly is the real trick.

Don't mean to point the finger, it's just that it's futile to think about and plan for other airlines until you honestly figure out what went wrong the last time and then fix it. Then and only then should you worry about how to explain this in a coherent, honest, positive fashion to an interview board.
 
Did you fail to recognize the high on final error and try to put in down anyway?

Come clean...confess...admit the whole scenerio. There aren't that many new mistakes in aviation, new ways to make the same error in a high tech way.
 
When you're instructing a primary student, how do you handle problems? If you feel they're not ready to solo, it's probably for a variety of little reasons that give you a bad feeling about their succes out there all alone. But to explain this in training records, or to your customer freindly boss, or even to the eager student, you have to pin the problem on a few significant material problems. Could that ill-fated approach just have been the last straw to a concerned check-airman? If he's gonna fail you, he has to have a good reason to put on paper. The GA may have been the "short" story.
 
there has to be more to the story, did you try and force the landing in and the capt have to take the plane or forget the gear?
Dont freak out because you arent getting calls because you are kinda of a low timer just keep flying and i am sure you will be fine.
 
I appreciate everyone's comments and assume that the interview boards I have met with since the bust had similar reactions. Going from a Seminole to a EMB-145 is challenging no matter how good a pilot you are, but what I said in my first post is the truth. Visuals were the primary reason for the extra time in IOE, but again, the extra time was not extraordinary. I agree that more time will help, but I'm not sure that doing stalls in a 172 and accumulating 500 more hours is going to make me any more qualified for a regional than I am now.
 
sht happens. In your case though its just lack of experience. I would be honest about it. 920/150 is nothing and I can say for certain that you were in way over your head. However dont get down about it.. When I think I had your experience level there was probably no way I couldve made it thru training and IOE. Its scary to me to think that there are folks going from c152s into a 50pax regjet. I basis this just on my own experience. Good luck and stick with it...just build up your experience level.

P.S.
Your career is no where near ruined..this happens more than you think and people recover and go on to have good careers. Also at your experience level it is easily explained and understood.
 
Getting fired is not the end of the world! I know of several people who have been "asked to resign" for different reasons, and they all seem to bounce right back. Push on, keep updating your resume, and something will happen.
It sounds to me like the IOE checkairman was having a bad day to "bust you."
737
 
Well if you are telling the truth (and not just lying to yourself) you need to come up with a better story than that to tell interviewers.

You need to explain that the high approach was the culmination of a long day, blah blah, you weren't giving it your A game, and you didn't recognize when you weren't operating to full strength. Because you didn't recognize the captain decided to take the aircraft, or something.

I would not believe you as an interviewer (just as I don't here) if you try to say you failed for just one thing.

It's like saying you failed for doing a flow in the wrong order, it's not the only thing that happened that day.
 
pilotbts1972,

that sounds a bit strange that a well known company would fire you for a poor visual approach to a go-around and a little extra IOE, especially having spent 20K+ on you during training like Cardinal said. I'm not saying I don't believe you, but that sounds a bit strange. I'm also at a well known regional which does everything they can to get you through training. I can attest they wouldn't fire an individual for a poor approach during IOE, maybe even a few bad approaches. Check Airman understand the learning curve and it's their job to work with you and get you through it, because after all, they were in your shoes at one point as well. I've heard of people washing out, but most of the time it's because of extreme circumstances where they are just not "getting it" or they can't keep up with the pace. I have never heard of someone busting for one bad visual approach. Keep your head up and move on. Who knows, maybe it was for the best. Look at it that way.
 
Get the Part 135 PIC minimums and start flying freight. It's a great way to get lots of experience and build some good years behind you to show to a future airline.
 
mynameisjim,

The problem is that it wasn't the result of a long day or a bad day and I don't want to lie and pretend otherwise in front of an interview board. I simply screwed up the visual. Again, visual's were the main problem for extra IOE and that problem continued on the line check. I thought I had corrected the problem, but since I'm back in a C-172, obviously the problem wasn't corrected to the point where the IOE Check Airman could sign me off.
 
Bankangle said:
Its scary to me to think that there are folks going from c152s into a 50pax regjet. understood.
Dude, there are people with less time than this guy/gal that get into a bomber and friggin go to Iraq. Let's stop the low time dramatics.
 
PilotBTS1972 said:
I have no reason to lie on a forum where I'm anonymous. It is what it is and the training records don't lie.
Not nocking you BTS, but just for my own curiosity, how much of your TT is split time?

Time where you split a twin or single rental and logged it with another pilot.
 
Mesa is hiring. (assuming it wasn't Mesa you were at in the first place).

Your familiarity with the ERJ will help you when you come the CRJ. Same basic concepts.

It has it's moments. But the Boyd group lists two RJP (RJ providers) as "bulletproof". Mesa, and Skywest. Everyone else is a crapshoot.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top