flyboyike
Urban Legend/Rural Myth
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
- Posts
- 1,852
I think somebody with that kind of experience would know that there is a time and place for that type of discussion.
Perhaps.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think somebody with that kind of experience would know that there is a time and place for that type of discussion.
I think somebody with that kind of experience would know that there is a time and place for that type of discussion.
Where'd you hear that??? God let's hope not.Geeze flyboy, give it a rest.
Now they are saying there may have been four on board.
p.s. anyone know the initials of the crew. I have two friends over on the 11 there. Haven't been able to get ahold of either today.
Right-O buddy! As for RJ boy, I'm not "flipping-out" as you so eloquently stated. Just tired of DBs like you in this industry. There is such a thing called "tact" & "respect"....get some.
Actually, it was McNugget who "eloquently stated" that you were flipping out. Which you were.
I'm done.... no need to keep arguing with an idiot. peace out!
It's just a message board. Don't get all bent out of shape and blow-up. You're only going to burn-out, that way.
Well I'll apply the foot in mouth boldface and state that if you all think there is no correlation between the early -11 crashes with the horizontal tail surface design-induced de facto instability/PIO pitch control problem (windshear or no windshear, that shouldn't matter either if the design was allowed to go forth...), with identical gear collapse, wing catching and separating on the ground and body flip, and the Narita accident in question, you've buried your head in the sand or got drunk on the kool-aid. I only went to rocket science school for 8 years but that M.O. is fooookin obvious.
Well, you see, I fly an RJ, which means I have no brain and certainly no right to voice an opinion or even a fact. Now, had I been a 777 skipper with 26,000TT I could have said whatever I wanted and nobody would have objected.
Right, everyone?
Nothing wrong with an RJ....almsot every 777 pilot you speak of with 26K TT started in them.
Fly91 said:Either way, that plane has a design flaw that should be addressed. "Relaxed stability" design for a heavy aircraft is just plain stupid. I wonder how many more MD-11's have to flip over and slide down the runway in a fireball, before the scumbag FAA does something.