The problem is that when we vote it down (which I think is likely) the company will come up with a new "nugget" program to fill the bases. Some guy making sqaut at a regional would jump on the opportunity to be hired into the right seat of a wide body at FedEx. Of course, if it does somehow pass and not enough people bid it, they will still have to start another "nugget" program.
I have heard this "argument" stated repeatedly, but does it actually make sense?
It's one thing to put a cherry-picked "golden nugget" into ANC in the RIGHT seat of a MD-11, but is the company really going to do that for both the LEFT and RIGHT seats in CDG & HKG??
If that was so advantageous to the company why would they even propose this LOA to begin with? --- just go direct to that game plan.
From mgmts perspective, is what we would be asking in a counter offer really that much more expensive to offeset the risks associated with running these FDAs with all "new hires"?
There are clear benefits to the company to have experience and continuity in these FDAs. I think they need and will sweeten the deal if they are confronted with that decision.
I think this was a very low ball offer that the MEC was premature in recommending to the masses --- we should decline and can do better.
A housing (and our COLA) based on exchange rates needs to added --- and upgraded, by at least double, to that equal to O-4 or O-5 housing allowances in the DOD, or some other relevant benchmark.
The HHG weights need to increase dramatically (...currently they are less then I received as a 2Lt going to Japan 21 yrs ago!) Once again, what benchmarks were used?
Medical and dental needs to be explicitly addressesed.
Quality English-based schooling needs to be addressed
This is actually a very classic low ball negotiating strategy on the company's part --- because if we turn it down and then the company comes back with even somewhat reasonable offers in
these areas, we will truly believe we are getting a much better deal, when in fact it won't be "gold plated" at all --- just equal to other benchmarked organizations.
Unfortunately, I think the process to date has already built distrust between mgt and the pilots regarding the QOL at these FDAs, and the folks who bid will still be very junior in the right seat --- looking for a quick upgrade....and empty nest Captains in the left seat --- looking for some adventure.
Of course, some wise old heads have told me --- never bid a new domicile or a new aircraft until you get a good look at a real bid pack --- and that will be very hard to do for quite some time.
If I had a vote --- I'd vote "NO"
(...looks like I'll miss the vote by about two weeks)