I'm not speaking for the union as i don't know inner workings and speak to my P2P rep on a regular basis. My P2P rep explained to me that the union wasnt necessarily against the VSP, they just wanted a LOA to cover it. Ricci and mgt won't negotiate with the union, they want it their way or nothing. This is not how union/company relationships work. The company can't just set policy for pay benefits schedules etc without the consent of the union. The union has a say in such policies and how they are implemented. Should the IBT just allow the company implement the VSP without negotiations it would set the precident in court that the union will allow the company to set pay and benefits without the consent of the union. Funny how the union is fighting for 1 year of pay and recall rights for those furloughs, you forgot to mention that part in your post. The company is the one who refuses to negotiate in good faith which is a blantant violation of federal law. Ricci continues to knowingly and willingly break federal law. A fellow crewmember remarked that Kenn Ricci has been sued in Federal Court something like 15 times in the past 15 years and has lost every time. mach94 appears to be a troll.
Last edited: