Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

"Failed" Strike at ASA?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I really don't think we will ever know what will happen if ASA strikes. It won't happen. Delta will BK papers in hand if it gets right down to it, and will use the BK court to prevent a strike. Delta may well be in BK before you get the chance......I have no doubt they will head there to get rid of the pilots pension.
 
It didn't take a strike last time. Management is doing a fine job of forming a pilot group that is becomming more uniformily pissed off. It is not an illegal job action to enter a write up in the discrepancy log when it occurs no matter where it occurs! It is not our job to perform the resets required to "clear" these problems.

CP told me today that Willie has been authorized to do some extreme $hit in January and that the CPs are unauthorized to overide his assignments. Get ready to accept assignments with protest.
 
FDJ2 said:
Who's going to get the E170s?
Ask your MEC, but I think you already know the answer ( or you are very out of the loop ).

You are going to get the E-170's under your jets for jobs protocols, so you can fly them at an alter ego airline for 15 to 20% less than Connection pilots flying CRJ700's. LOA46 provides a "place marker" in the contract stipulating J4J, but the real details are contained elsewhere. Based on what we know now, the US Air furloughees get "super seniority" over your furloughees - but neither of us expect that to be the final arrangement, do we?

Once again, ALPA allowed us to be used to whipsaw each other. Delta furloughees will be compensated less than me for flying a much nicer airplane. The fleet plan used to call for the elimination of the MD88 and 737-200/300 fleet before the end of the decade. I do not know how the fleet plan may have changed, but surely even the disciples of the Delta MEC can see where they are being led. Welcome to the inside lane on the race to the bottom.

It is d@mn hard to negotiate a contract to improve this profession while being undercut in all corners, particularly from your own union. Like fly4food wrote, there are so many of us who are so fed up that we will vote with our feet. If Delta gets shut down in the process, good. This alter ego love fest between management and ALPA must end. Just as the Eastern pilots stood for what was right in ending Lorenzo's pillage of Eastern, perhaps the ASA pilots could do the right thing and send Delta into the history books.

And there is one big difference in the qualifications of ASA and Delta pilots. The HR folks at Airtran are the same people who fought the good fight at Eastern and remember how Delta treated them. If I'm not mistaken, Delta only hired 2 Eastern pilots - both scabs.

The World truly is round.

P.S. Ifly4food - Told you so. Anyone think that there was no link between LOA46 and the E-170's going outside ALPA to an airline that has no representational rights within ALPA? If the result is just about the same as what happened at Northwest, it is not a coincidence. Getting shut out of the next generation of jets is very bad news for ASA pilots.

Our next contract is going to be about as relevant as CC Air's if ALPA does not stop this alter ego business. You know support our negotiating efforts, but we are just arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. The 40 seat RJ has a lot worse numbers than a 737-200.
 
Last edited:
~~~^~~~ said:
You are going to get the E-170's under your jets for jobs protocols, so you can fly them at an alter ego airline for 15 to 20% less than Connection pilots flying CRJ700's. LOA46 provides a "place marker" in the contract stipulating J4J, but the real details are contained elsewhere.


There is no J4J with CHQ and you know it. Preferentiall hiring will be offered, but even if a furloughed DAL pilot is hired, he goes to the bottom and does not have to fly the E-170. In fact, based on his seniority, I bet a furloughed DAL guy hired at CHQ will not be on the E-170, not for a couple of years anyway, and then as an F/O.


The real details are elsewhere? Where? Why don't you enlighten us all as to the details of the J4Js deal? I would love to hear it.
 
Last edited:
~~~^~~~ said:
It is d@mn hard to negotiate a contract to improve this profession while being undercut in all corners, particularly from your own union. Like fly4food wrote, there are so many of us who are so fed up that we will vote with our feet. If Delta gets shut down in the process, good. This alter ego love fest between management and ALPA must end. Just as the Eastern pilots stood for what was right in ending Lorenzo's pillage of Eastern, perhaps the ASA pilots could do the right thing and send Delta into the history books.


This seems to be a growing sentiment among the ASA pilots.

If DCI is to continue as the poster child for management whipsaw, and the race to the bottom, a lot of our guys would rather see DAL CH11 - CH7 than be a part of it.

What makes the situation so dangerous is given the current financial situation at DAL, an ASA shut down would have a much more dramatic impact than the CMR strike did, and unlike the EAL pilots, most ASA guys can replace their income selling cars.

Given the current attitude of management towards settling the contract, and the ever expanding portfolio, I'd say management (and not just ASA's) is enormously under estimating the level of frustration and anger among the ASA pilots.

Pretty dangerous thing to do when you're dealing with a bunch of guys who'd get a raise if they went to work for Home Depot.
 
michael707767 said:
There is no J4J with CHQ and you know it. Preferentiall hiring will be offered, but even if a furloughed DAL pilot is hired, he goes to the bottom and does not have to fly the E-170. In fact, based on his seniority, I bet a furloughed DAL guy hired at CHQ will not be on the E-170, not for a couple of years anyway, and then as an F/O.
Preferential hiring in exchange for airplanes is J4J. What do you call it? Worse, you guys are giving up Delta longevity to fly the airplanes at sub standard pay rates. That Company "gimme" ranks right up there with buying Beech 1900 time at Gulfstream.

The "preferential hiring" is with Republic ( not CHQ, but I never wrote CHQ ) and it will be on the E-170 because Republic only operates that type. Republic was set up as an alter ego for furloughed mainline pilots and US Air's do have super seniority. But if you think the Delta MEC was dumb enough to sign off on this without having something to give their constituents at least the same protections as US Air pilots while flying Delta code - then you have even less confidence in them than I do.

Here, why don't you spend some time on their web site. I think you will like the E-170 even more than the MD88, shame it doesn't pay anything & it is Teamsters, not ALPA. But at least you can still hold on to your "Mainline" gig and ALPA National does not have to worry about more "Connection" pilots voting to rid the union of its lousy leadership team. After all, there are not that many $450,000.00 plus flying jobs around any more and Duane Woerth has one.

http://www.republicairlines.com/aircraft.asp#

CF34-3B1 : You Sir, are exactly correct.
 
Last edited:
~~~^~~~ said:
The "preferential hiring" is with Republic ( not CHQ, but I never wrote CHQ ) and it will be on the E-170 because Republic only operates that type. Republic was set up as an alter ego for US Air's furloughed pilots and they do have super seniority. But if you think the Delta MEC was dumb enough to sign off on this without having something to give their constituents at least the same protections as US Air pilots while flying Delta code - then you have even less confidence in them than I do.

CF34-3B1 : You Sir, are exactly correct.


Ok, you may be correct in one regard. I was told it would be CHQ, not Republic, operating the E-170 for DCI. I'll have to check on that one. Either way, a true J4J deal would have our guys flying all or a set number of the E-170 seats, and in the Captain seat like the USAirways guys got. Preferential hiring is a far cry from J4J. At least as our own MEC explained it to us, it does not gaurantee jobs to our furloughed guys. There is nothing saying who will be hired or in what order, and there is nothing saying how many guys have to be hired as part of preferential hiring. CHQ or Republic, whoever operates the 170, may well be able to hire a very small number of furloughed DAL guys and satisfy that requirement.

The preferential hiring is for anyone who agrees to operate some of the additional 70 seaters. In this case it may be Republic. Next time, it may be ASA or CMR. In that case, what I said would apply, the furloughed DAL guys would in fact go to the bottom and would fly what their seniority will hold, not a 70 seater. I agree with you in one regard. We did not do as well for our furloughed guys are USAirways did. Being hired to the bottom to fly even an E-170 is not worth it, and I bet very few guys will do it.


As far as confidence in my own MEC, I probably do have less confidence in them that you, because I have zero confidence in them. I'll bet you will be a captain on a 100 seat jet flying under the DAL code long before I will.
 
Last edited:
michael707767 said:
I'll bet you will be a captain on a 100 seat jet flying under the DAL code long before I will.
I hope not. Delta flying has to be done by Delta pilots - period. If our union officials do not recognize this, then it is time to replace them.

By the way, my apologies for the insulting post, I cleaned it up.

Regards,
~~~^~~~
 
Last edited:
~~~^~~~ said:
I hope not. Delta flying has to be done by Delta pilots - period. If our union officials do not recognize this, then it is time to replace them.

By the way, my apologies for the insulting post, I cleaned it up.

Regards,
~~~^~~~



No apologies necessary. I don't take anything I read here personally, and I hope you don't either.


I fully realize right now our scope would prevent what I said. But, as has been pointed out, that can change. I think when the time comes my MEC will fold on the issue of outsourcing 100 seaters.
 
My $0.02 is striking is premature. a company Sick day would be a better message. It only costs the company one day of lost revenue plus a few unhappy customers and lets "them" know we are serious.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top