ok... first of all, Count how many successful strikes there have been in the history of ALPA. Now, count how many successful airline strikes there have been under Bush's presidency. The later is a higher number (100%). Lest we forget that Comair's strike was successul in many respects and occured during President Bush's first term.
Now, what did you vote for?? Did you just blindly listen to ALPA or do you care about morals (i.e. not getting bj's in the white house), integrity, fairness and strong defense of our country when we are attacked (despite what other socialist countries such as France say about it). ASA can and will, if necessary, have a succesful strike just like Comair did under Bush. The only difference is Comair's strike was during the official recession (March - october 2001) and ASA is negotiating in a very strong economy. There is no reason ASA should not top Comair's rates and benefits, without a strike.
Now, what did you vote for?? Did you just blindly listen to ALPA or do you care about morals (i.e. not getting bj's in the white house), integrity, fairness and strong defense of our country when we are attacked (despite what other socialist countries such as France say about it). ASA can and will, if necessary, have a succesful strike just like Comair did under Bush. The only difference is Comair's strike was during the official recession (March - october 2001) and ASA is negotiating in a very strong economy. There is no reason ASA should not top Comair's rates and benefits, without a strike.