nosehair
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2003
- Posts
- 1,238
"probably" is the operative word, here.Anyone who can recognize and recover a spin in the clouds probably has enough training not to get into one in the first place.
Do you want to fly with a pilot who has been certificated because he "probably" can recover the airplane "IF", you know, the Big If that circles 'round back in everybody's mind, 'cept maybe you,..'if' something unusual happens. Do you?
Then that's where more training is needed, Sir.I would hazard a guess the 20% of spins which do occur +1000' are probably 90% the result of training incidents with a CFI.
When I instructed fixed/wing for the Army, we did spins. The student demonstrated a 3 turn precision spin entry and recovery prior to solo on a pre-solo checkride. The Army Aviation School did not have spin accidents as a result of training. Because spin training was an intrgal part of stall training.
Spin accidents occur in training because current flight instructor get a couple of demo spins and get signed off. Spins are not being trained - that's why the accidents are occuring - - Duh!
And anyway, you miss the point. It isn't about being able to recover in less than 1000'. It's about being able to PREVENT the airplane fron going beyond a 90 degree roll in an upset. That's what you can get a handle on when you are proficient at spins.
When you are proficient at spin entry, recovery and prevention, you won't get into that base-to-final entry to begin with. ...
...or, if you're feelin' sassy, you might do a spin-roll-turn in that base-to-final turn 'cause you can.
Thass what I'm tawkin' bout.