Gr82Aviate
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2004
- Posts
- 1,180
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
surplus1 said:They have no sacred right to the EMB170/190 merely because they work for a legacy carrier. They want it becasue it is to their advantage. Well, I want it for the same reason. None of them are worrying about what is best for me; in fact the exact opposite is true. Why then should I be obligated to worry about what is best for them at my own expense? That's just not logical.
That's like telling me that an AirTran pilot should wish that his airline should not fly the 737-800 because it might affect a Delta pilots' wishes to fly more 737-800s at Delta. Instead, the AirTran pilot should want his company to use only the B-717 in hopes that he may get a better job at Delta some time in the future. That's ludicrous.
surplus1 said:Once the bigger equipment comes on line, and it will, the "regional" job, at a big regional, will be just as good as AirTran or JetBlue.
surplus1 said:One thing is certain, there is no legacy pilot group with any interest in protecting the jobs at any regional pilot group. If they have the chance to take those jobs, they will and it will not include embracing the affected regional "brothers". That legacy dude is protecting his own interests and will continue to do so, as he always has. The regional pilot needs to protect his own interests in the very same way.
surplus1 said:ALPA still has some advantages, but regional pilots need to understand that ALPA's primary interest is the protection of the jobs of the legacy pilots, whether or not that comes at the expense of the regional pilots' job.
FreightNazi said:But what if the newhire is former military? You don't expect him to start in a turboprop do you? Maybe the civilians could start in the turboprop and the military guys start in the 737/A-320 size jet. That sounds more fair. Otherwise, you are not going to be able to attract the military pilots as most will not want to start out flying a turboprop.
FreightNazi said:But what if the newhire is former military? You don't expect him to start in a turboprop do you? Maybe the civilians could start in the turboprop and the military guys start in the 737/A-320 size jet. That sounds more fair. Otherwise, you are not going to be able to attract the military pilots as most will not want to start out flying a turboprop.
Tram said:You know, there are military pilots who arn't the best pilots in the world, right?
Axel said:If there had never been a market for separate "regionals" none of this would be happening.
"When you point your finger 'cause your plans fell through, there'll be three more fingers pointing back at you."
--Dire Straits
You say that like it's a problem.FreightNazi said:But what if the newhire is former military? You don't expect him to start in a turboprop do you? Maybe the civilians could start in the turboprop and the military guys start in the 737/A-320 size jet. That sounds more fair. Otherwise, you are not going to be able to attract the military pilots as most will not want to start out flying a turboprop.
Superpilot92 said:http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?aircraft_genericsearch=Embraer%20ERJ-190%2F195&distinct_entry=true
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/865258/M/
I hope no one wants to fly this for a regional. the 170 never should have been either.