Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Does SAPA do all this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nevets
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 12

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Skywest management: "Pilots, here are your new wage rates."

Any other questions, Nevets?

Last time I checked, Skywest flies 90 seaters for 50 seat wages too. Thank god SAPA negotiated such a greeeeeaaaat deal.
 
Skywest management: "Pilots, here are your new wage rates."

Any other questions, Nevets?

Last time I checked, Skywest flies 90 seaters for 50 seat wages too. Thank god SAPA negotiated such a greeeeeaaaat deal.

There has to be some "formula" for lack of a better word, on how they come up with them.
 
How does Skywest go about setting pay rates for their aircraft?[/quot\

The pilots at Skywest voted in favor of flying the 700 for 200 rates. It was an ace that they dealt to their management team.
Lets see,
A vote conducted by company lackeys, with no transparency, and put into place by the company. Vote? there was no vote, just a smoke and mirrors puppet show conducted by the likes of DL, ME, JB et al.
The wool was pulled over your eyes and the company laughs all the way to the bank. Children stop believing in the easter bunny around 4-5, SKYW pilots continue believe in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. skyturd, jea and $hitpac all drink the kool-aid, and don't even realize that the kool-aid fountain is really JA's own personal urinal.
PBR
 
What I meant is how does management come up with the wages to begin with?
They take the most outrageous rate they can think of, run it by the SAPA lackey force, if they don't soil their Depends adult undergarments, it must be good. Then the salesforce that they spend more than $600,000 a year on proceed to sell it with the usual smoke and mirrors,"deal me an ace" puppet show. The turdz like skyturd et al, then whiff on the freshly loaded diaper smell emanating from the company proposal, and their SJS addled "brains", think "wow that will be really cool to be a pilot on an airplane with GASP, 70 whole seats, go to training and then fly it for, GASP the same rate as those crappy 50 seaters." Wow the company really must love me" passes through their pea brains, because they bought me a plane that is even easier to fly than those crappy 50 seat POSs. Well after the SJS wears off and the 70s start to have that a$$ smell their SJS addled brains start to add the difference that all the pilots at other carriers get more money to do the same work, and the grumbling starts. SKYW mgmt hears the grumbling all the way out at the houseboat, over the roar of the Bombarier jet skis, while drinking umbrella drinks served by SAPA toads(wearing french maid outfits) and add some goofy "override" formula to quell the rumblings, so they can get back to their umbrella drinks, having spent 5-8 minutes deciding on how to pull the wool back down over the pilots eyes.
Enough for now, gotta go fly!
PBR
 
Last edited:
Lets see,
A vote conducted by company lackeys, with no transparency, and put into place by the company. Vote? there was no vote, just a smoke and mirrors puppet show conducted by the likes of DL, ME, JB et al.
The wool was pulled over your eyes and the company laughs all the way to the bank. Children stop believing in the easter bunny around 4-5, SKYW pilots continue believe in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. skyturd, jea and $hitpac all drink the kool-aid, and don't even realize that the kool-aid fountain is really JA's own personal urinal.
PBR

But what I'm asking is how do they come up with the rate that they put up to vote to begin with?
 
But what I'm asking is how do they come up with the rate that they put up to vote to begin with?





I believe they rounded a .1% raise down to 0% for the the EMB pilots, and this allowed them to round a 1/2% raise up to a whopping 1%(total for the next 4 years)for the RJ's...this after no COLA since out anniversary prior to 9/11(another 7 years of 0%)!

This was apparently more than enought to keep the kool-aid swillers like Skynation more anti-ALPA than ever!
 
Last edited:
I believe they rounded a .1% raise down to 0% for the the EMB pilots, and this allowed them to round a 1/2% raise up to a whopping 1%(total for the next 4 years)for the RJ's...this after no COLA since out anniversary prior to 9/11(another 7 years of 0%)!

This was apparently more than enought to keep the kool-aid swillers like Skynation more anti-ALPA than ever!

Did Skywest management look at what other unionized regionals were paying their pilots' to set their own rate?
 
Does SAPA do this?


How Does ALPA Work for Pilots in Washington, DC?


As an airline pilot, your career is one of the most regulated in the country. Virtually every
aspect of your livelihood is controlled by laws passed by the U.S. Congress and
regulations adopted by the Executive branch of government. That’s why it’s critical to
have one strong, well-respected voice in Washington to articulate your job- and industryrelated
concerns. ALPA is that voice.

ALPA’s Government Affairs specialists and political action committee, ALPA-PAC, form a
very powerful team in the nation’s capital, working to protect your interests, your future,
and your livelihood every day.

ALPA protects your financial health
Ø ALPA led a successful seven-year campaign to prohibit states from taxing former
residents’ pension benefits—so-called “source taxation.”

Ø ALPA has secured several tax benefits for you, including:
*repealing the combined limit on benefits and contributions for participants
(including pilots) in both qualified defined benefit and contribution plans (Sec.
415(e));
*allowing lump-sum pension distributions to be rolled over into an IRA without
penalty;
*increasing the amount of compensation that can be used to calculate pension
benefits under a qualified plan from $170,000 to $200,000; and
*removing the additional tax on “excess” retirement distributions and
accumulations.

Ø ALPA undertook a major campaign to reverse the Supreme Court’s Bildisco bankruptcy
decision, persuading Congress to enact legislation that outlaws a company’s ability to
unilaterally abrogate its union contracts by declaring bankruptcy.

Ø ALPA worked with other AFL-CIO affiliated unions to defeat efforts to allow
corporations to use “excess” pension fund assets from defined benefit plans for any
purpose they chose.

Ø ALPA led the fight to obtain enactment of legislation that gives airlines a longer
amortization period and use of a more favorable interest rate in order to pay down the
unfunded liability of their defined benefit pension plans. Such legislation is designed
to prevent the termination of defined benefit plans, a trend that has plagued the
industry in recent years.

Ø ALPA led the fight to obtain enactment of legislation that would allow pilots whose
defined benefit plans have been terminated to receive a higher guaranteed benefit from
the PBGC.

ALPA improves aviation safety
Following “9-11,” ALPA Government Affairs staff—in conjunction with pilots of many
carriers who make up the Security Task Force, the National Security Committee, and the
Engineering and Air Safety and Communications Departments’ staff—made significant
contributions to the development of the Aviation Security Act, which was signed into law
on November 19, 2001 (PL 107-71). Included among the provisions recommended by
ALPA was the strengthening of cockpit doors and federalizing the security workforce.

Ø ALPA was at the forefront of the fight to enact legislation that created the Federal
Flight Deck Officer Program (FFDO). Despite the strong opposition of the
administration and the airlines, ALPA was able to win enactment of legislation that
created a program for qualified, volunteer pilots, both cargo and passenger, to be
trained and deputized as Federal Flight Deck Officers and to carry firearms as a last
line of defense against terrorism.

Ø ALPA convinced the FAA and DOT to establish one level of safety for all U.S.
commercial airline operations.

Ø ALPA led the effort to obtain legislation preventing the premature release of CVRs to
the public.

Ø ALPA has been a major player in developing the Airport and Airway Improvement
Program (AIP) and Aviation Trust Fund legislation during the last two decades,
including:
*establishing a “highest priority” list of safety items and navigational aids for
installation at commercial airports and directives on other safety features related to
crash survivability, fire retardation, and TCAS installation;
*pushing for release of Trust Fund moneys to be used for airport improvements;
*obtaining money for “universal access system” development and making the
equipment eligible for funding under AIP; and
*obtaining funding for programs to prevent runway incursion.

Ø ALPA has obtained federal funding for the Association’s Human Intervention and
Motivation Study (HIMS) substance-abuse program.

ALPA leads opposition to foreign control of U.S. airlines
In November 2005, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) issued a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that would overturn long-standing policies prohibiting
foreign interests from exercising actual control over U.S. airlines.

Ø ALPA adamantly opposed DOT’s proposal because it would:
*Lead to outsourcing of U.S. piloting jobs;
*Undermine the Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF); and
*Violate federal law prohibiting foreign control of U.S. airlines

Ø In December 2005, ALPA initiated a letter of protest sent by 85 members of the U.S.
House of Representatives and 5 U.S. senators to DOT. The administration dismissed
congressional opposition and refused to withdraw the NPRM.

Ø At ALPA’s prompting, legislation was introduced (December 2005) in both the House
(H.R. 4542) and Senate (S. 2135) that would prohibit the DOT from issuing a final rule
for one year and would direct DOT to bring the proposal before Congress.

Ø ALPA President Capt. Duane Woerth testified before the U.S. House Aviation
Subcommittee (February 2006) voicing serious concerns about the impact of the NPRM
on the U.S. piloting profession.

Ø Both the House and Senate Appropriations Committees included and passed report
language in the Supplemental Appropriations bill (April 2006) that would essentially
prohibit DOT from spending any funds to issue or to implement the proposal.

Ø In June 2006, ALPA spearheaded a lobbying effort that led to the successful passage of
the Oberstar-LoBiondo-Poe amendment in the House by an overwhelmingly bipartisan
vote of 291–137 in the Transportation Appropriations bill. The amendment would
prohibit DOT from using funds to issue and implement its current rulemaking. As a
follow-up, in a letter to the DOT Secretary, key members of Congress, including House
Armed Services Committee Chairman Duncan Hunter (R-CA), called on the DOT to
withdraw its NPRM.

Ø In July 2006, ALPA moved the fight to the Senate where an identical amendment
passed impressively by a vote of 19–6 in the Transportation Appropriations bill. In his
statement to the news media, President Woerth said: “Resounding opposition from
both houses of Congress and from both sides of the aisle is an unmistakable directive:
The DOT and the administration must immediately shelve this ill-conceived proposal
and bring any attempt to overturn the current law prohibiting foreign control of U.S.
airlines before Congress.”

Ø On December 5, 2006, DOT formally withdrew the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
that would have allowed foreign control of U.S. airline carriers.

ALPA has political clout
ALPA has been consulted prior to the appointment of top officials at the FAA, DOT,
NTSB, NMB, the Labor Department, and other key posts in the Executive branch because
of its excellent relations with pro-labor decision-makers in Washington.

ALPA achieves legislative and regulatory victories such as these in large part because of a
strong, well-funded legislative/political action program.

Information provided by:
ALPA’s Government Affairs Department
Paul Hallisay, Director
 
Did Skywest management look at what other unionized regionals were paying their pilots' to set their own rate?





Sorry, I was being sarcastic because I felt the "offer" they made was so sad and pathetic...it seems to me the only thing they did was try and figure out what figure was the absolute lowest they could offer and then have SAPA push as a fabulous offer that we had better vote yes on.?!
So they came up with 1% for some, 0% for others after we turned down the original very generous 1.2% for everyone...
 
So if SAPA doesn't do any of this, what exactly do they do with their management funded agenda?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom