Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

DL/NWA Seniority List Integration Arbitration starts TODAY...article

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I'll step in and call BS on this one. Show me one document from anyone at NWA that shows this.

The expert who was hired by your flight attendants in their fight with your management had access to the NWA business plan.

Based on everything he saw from the company, the replacement aircraft is already flying (and not by NWA pilots and flight attendants).

Then he proceeded to illustrate this by describing a couple dozen routes that used to be flown with DC-9s and are now flown by "big RJs".

The speed and scope (pardon the pun!) with which this was done was staggering for me to see (this from a guy who has seen some serious RJ growth at his own company in the past!)

So please share the big secret with the rest of us. What model and how many are going to replace the 100 or so DC-9s that you guys have?

I would love to hear about it, because it would be good for all of us!

Abe

Again, For some reason you DAL guys cant grasp this ;), but we have scope protections that set a Mainline Aircraft Floor 1 year after bankruptcy that mgmt couldn't go below without FIRST parking 76 seaters. Therefore a replacement aircraft had to come to Mainline. I know you guys want to believe all of our DC9s were going to get parked and you guys are coming in and saving us but thats just not the case. There is alot involved with all of this.

Oh and using the FA's negotiations as a comparison of the pilots doesnt work because we have the scope protections in our contract.
 
Last edited:
That is also now the new DAL plan.
Says who? Delta's network planning V.P. was not two feet away when I heard him clearly say, there is no suitable 100 seat aircraft and anything in that size we buy now is already obsolete. ... We are very happy with the way the large CRJ's and Embraer jets are working out.

... and this statement matches exactly with the Company's actions both before and after the merger and integration plans.

Hey, I'd love to have the opportunity to bid Captain on one of these jets instead of waiting. But it just isn't happening.

There are more mainline 100 seaters coming, in the form of 737-700's which will fly a different mission than the DC9/RJ and which will go a whole lot more senior. But this order far pre-dated any thought of a NWA merger and is only slightly impacted by the integration of our operations.
 
Says who? Delta's network planning V.P. was not two feet away when I heard him clearly say, there is no suitable 100 seat aircraft and anything in that size we buy now is already obsolete. ... We are very happy with the way the large CRJ's and Embraer jets are working out.

... and this statement matches exactly with the Company's actions both before and after the merger and integration plans.

Hey, I'd love to have the opportunity to bid Captain on one of these jets instead of waiting. But it just isn't happening.

There are more mainline 100 seaters coming, in the form of 737-700's which will fly a different mission than the DC9/RJ and which will go a whole lot more senior. But this order far pre-dated any thought of a NWA merger and is only slightly impacted by the integration of our operations.


DC9's are to be kept flying through 2012 until a replacement can be found for the 100 seat market. Thats what your team is saying. The DC9 fills a void in the DAL fleet. From now until 2012 we all need to ensure any further aircraft are delivered and flown as mainline aircraft.
 
Super, I hear you, but that horse is already out of the barn. As for new orders, yes!
 
From now until 2012 we all need to ensure any further aircraft are delivered and flown as mainline aircraft.

On that, we can agree!

Just out of curiosity, how many DC-9s (flying) do you have right now?

And how many did you have at BK exit?

And how many currently flying are due to be parked by the end of the year?

Abe
 
Hi!

the NWA leadership team has not been proactive in trying to replace our DC9s with anything. They have stated that the engine technology is just not there for the 100-125 seat range airplane.

They are right, the advanced engine technology for a 100+ seat aircraft (which is what the -30s and -50s are) that is substantially better than what is operating now, is not available now.

It HAS been announced, and the first generation is the GTF (Geared Turbofan) engine by Pratt & Whitney. It will power the new Mitsubishi and the Bombardier "C" aircraft. The "C" is what NWA has been planning to replace the -9 with. It is a 100-150-class seat aircraft, and is due to come off the assembly line starting in 2012.

cliff
YIP
 
Yes, and if they can get the composites correct along with the GTF, it will offer a 25% saving over current category aircraft. If not it will be a looser.
They need to get it correct because the two large a/c manufacturers are going to coming out with their answers in 2018.
 
It HAS been announced, and the first generation is the GTF (Geared Turbofan) engine by Pratt & Whitney. It will power the new Mitsubishi and the Bombardier "C" aircraft. The "C" is what NWA has been planning to replace the -9 with. It is a 100-150-class seat aircraft, and is due to come off the assembly line starting in 2012.

cliff
YIP
Cliff,

Find me one direct quote to support what you write. I've posted over and over again Steenland and his managers talking about the replacement of the DC9's with RJ's.

Again, the C Series was canceled after NWA said they were not interested. Delta has no interest either, although I sincerely wish that they did - that's our upgrade if it gets bought.
 
Guess what NWA is not planning on doing anything. They will have to do a lot of planning if the merger does not get approved by the DOJ though.
Only plans are for another addition to the lake house on Minnetonka.

 
NWA has already announced it has no further interest in the C-series....I remember reading that a couple months ago.
 
Listen here "little boy":rolleyes:, you assume that a replacement was never going to be brought to NWA. NWA was already looking at replacement aircraft for Mainline. There is no secret in the fact that the DC9's were going to be used in the interim until the replacement aircraft had been chosen and No it wasnt 76 seaters. That is also now the new DAL plan.

Puffdriver = Drama Queen :bawling:

Yawn, I'd like to see it in writing. It ain't there.

Drama queen? Look in the mirror. Your posts are all hype and little substance. You speak like a very junior pilot who is still wet behind the ears. Time to grow up.
 
There is no secret in the fact that the DC9's were going to be used in the interim until the replacement aircraft had been chosen and No it wasnt 76 seaters. :bawling:

You're right, it was suppose to be a 77-110 seater paying even less than the DC-9. Refer to NALPA's March 2006 publication "Across the Table."
 
Yawn, I'd like to see it in writing. It ain't there.

Drama queen? Look in the mirror. Your posts are all hype and little substance. You speak like a very junior pilot who is still wet behind the ears. Time to grow up.

Substance to you may not be substance to me fwiw. Also, I assure you that your posts bring just as much relevance to me as mine probably bring to you :pimp:. Time to grow up and stop with the childish bickering you constantly attempt on this forum.

Thanks again for your substantial contribution to the discussion Puffybaby. Kisses :blush:
 
You're right, it was suppose to be a 77-110 seater paying even less than the DC-9. Refer to NALPA's March 2006 publication "Across the Table."

It was told to me that any replacement aircraft brought on in the future as a mainline DC9 replacement aircraft would Start at DC9 rates as a minimum thanks to the JCBA. Its late and i dont feel like looking this up but That was mentioned to me by a union official as his understanding. fwiw
 
Hi!

Just checked the Bombardier website. They have at least 17 webpages devoted to the "C".

July 15, 2008 — Farnborough, U.K.
Aerospace
Bombardier and Shenyang Aircraft Corporation Sign Contract Related to CSeries Commercial Aircraft
Today, Bombardier Aerospace signed a contract with the Shenyang Aircraft Corporation (SAC), a subsidiary of the state-owned aviation industrial entity China Aviation Industry Corporation (AVIC I), to supply the centre fuselage on the newly launched Bombardier CSeries aircraft.

It doesn't sound like they've cancelled the "C" to me.

cliff
YIP
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom