Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta TA = ALPAs failure of representation for regionals

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Oh, I see. So it's illegal for ALPA National to interfere except for when they deem it necessary to interfere. Got it!

That is not what I got from what he wrote. If the TA complies with the administrative manual, the president is required to sign it. He has no discretion on the matter either way. He is just an administrator who does what he is told via the constitution & by-laws, administrative manual, and resolutions. It would have been illegal for him not to interfere in that particular case.

Delta makes more money from its regional contracts than any other carrier. A significant part of that profit goes straight into the pockets of Delta pilots (pay rates). ASA, CMR and RAH are all in section 6 negotiations. PCL is in concessionary BK negotiations. Sooo....Delta pilots set up the mother of all whipsaws - in order to put more money in their own pockets. How can you say there is not a conflict of interest?

Delta will use GoJets as a 'stalking horse' and CMR as an example of what will happen if you don't play the game. Delta could still give all the new AC to a new or resurrected certificate, a la Compass. The total number of 'regional' pilots is going to decrease and they will make less than they could have. So that Delta pilots can make more.

Delta pilots in their greed fell for the same bait they have repeatedly taken before. They had an opportunity to turn the tide on this 'regional' nonsense. Rather than negotiate all 'widget' tail flying into their own agreement they beggared their brothers to put more money in their pockets.

That is management doing that, not the pilots.
 
Last edited:
Delta makes more money from its regional contracts than any other carrier. A significant part of that profit goes straight into the pockets of Delta pilots (pay rates). ASA, CMR and RAH are all in section 6 negotiations. PCL is in concessionary BK negotiations. Sooo....Delta pilots set up the mother of all whipsaws - in order to put more money in their own pockets. How can you say there is not a conflict of interest?

Delta will use GoJets as a 'stalking horse' and CMR as an example of what will happen if you don't play the game. Delta could still give all the new AC to a new or resurrected certificate, a la Compass. The total number of 'regional' pilots is going to decrease and they will make less than they could have. So that Delta pilots can make more.

Delta pilots in their greed fell for the same bait they have repeatedly taken before. They had an opportunity to turn the tide on this 'regional' nonsense. Rather than negotiate all 'widget' tail flying into their own agreement they beggared their brothers to put more money in their pockets.

If ALPA doesn't try and save the day and approach this as an opportunity for 'pattern bargaining' even I will through out my ALPA hat.

The former CAL and NWA groups are the only 'main line' pilots that have ever made a serious attempt at stopping this madness.


So, You wanted delta or anyother mainline pilot to think about the regionals while they are deciding how to vote. Got it. When you are deciding on your contract. Don't forget to help the mainline pilots.
 
Interesting. The DAL pilots also see a conflict of interest but through a slightly different lens: Too much regional influence at ALPA national. A net flow of funds away from the Delta pilot group and towards ALPA national and -- by extension -- regional pilot groups. The trend of taking flying from mainline and giving it to regional carriers (reversed by C2012, thankfully.) And, a kick below the belt for a lot of guys who remember Lawson's vendetta against Delta furloughees, the requirement to staff 35% of new hire classes from Connection. That last one caused a lot of consternation.

So, yes. There is most definitely a conflict of interest.
 
All pilots would be better off if all flying was done in house.
2nd best would be all regional flying at wholly owned.
3rd would be 3rd party companies. Ie colgan, Skywest etc.

Comair pilots tried their best in 2001 to increase pay and QOL at regionals. They should not be punished like they have been for doing this.
It would be very easy for delta pilots to add a clause that all 70-90 seat airplanes must be flown at a wholly owned and give delta pilots flow up and down rights.
 
It would be very easy for delta pilots to add a clause that all 70-90 seat airplanes must be flown at a wholly owned.

Define "very easy." And, while you're at it, where's the return on (negotiating) investment for Delta pilots?
 
Last edited:
All pilots would be better off if all flying was done in house.
2nd best would be all regional flying at wholly owned.
3rd would be 3rd party companies. Ie colgan, Skywest etc.

Comair pilots tried their best in 2001 to increase pay and QOL at regionals. They should not be punished like they have been for doing this.
It would be very easy for delta pilots to add a clause that all 70-90 seat airplanes must be flown at a wholly owned and give delta pilots flow up and down rights.

It would be easy also for regionals to add flow down for mainline guys also. Are you ready to fight for that in your contract?
 
Too funny

This TA, approved by ALPA at a major, directly will be responsible for job losses of regional pilots on 200 jets.
Excellent news!!!!

Perhaps folks will finally figure out that regional airlines are not really airlines but really mercenary crew leasing companies where the product is really labor.

When the major is providing the reimbursement for the aircraft lease, fuel, landing fees, gates, network planning (inc. sales), the only really profit potential for the "regional" is the difference between contract revenue and labor expenses. As a mercenary operation, the business plan is only as stable as the current regional feed contract. There is no guarantee of one to follow or a contract for the same major airline. Those jobs "lost" on the reduction of 200 RJ's were never stable or guaranteed in the first place, let alone forever.

This is not a slam on regional pilots. Regional airlines are what they are and a great place to get some experience and move on; but if anybody considers working for a single regional airline an option for an entire career they are nuts.

The net result of the DAL TA will be more mainline jobs. Might as well slam ALPA for that as well. Better jobs created = ALPA sux?

I just wish somebody could explain to me how DAL can make record profits in a recession while paying 2nd year F/O's more than VA pays captains while is VA losing money hand over fist????
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top