Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Degree - "NOT REQUIRED"

  • Thread starter Thread starter killjack
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 24

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
WWII, Vietnam

Most of the pilots who flew in WWII did not have degree; they performed feats in the air that showed they had extraordinary skill as pilots. How do you measure the pilot skill to hold a B-24 in formation at FL140 for nine hours? How do you measure flying 350 NM from your carrier using DR only and safely returns every time? How do you measure shooting down 5 enemy airplanes in 5 minute? These feats were performed by pilots without degrees. In Vietnam most of the helo drivers did not have degrees, does that mean they did not perform unbelievably in combat? My first PPC in the P-3 did not have a college degree, (former Navcad) he was one of the finest pilots I ever flew with. The degree has nothing to do wit flying an airplane.

 
Those pilots that pay $100,000 for their degree then pursue their career are not the smartest, maybe the complete opposite. Wouldn't a smarter person pursue their regional airline job as fast as possible, maybe only getting their first two years done at a Community College, while building some flight time. Then getting on with a regional and slowly work on their degree while building quality time? Then you can be Captain and be finishing up you degree in time to apply to a major, while your buddy is just getting on with your regional as your first officer making nothing and trying to pay off his/her student loans. It's not about how smart your resume makes you look. It's about being qualified during the small windows of hiring at the majors. It's all about seniority.
 
Words of wisdom

barer pole has some great advice there.
 
I was gonna write this long paragraph about how i have as much college under my belt as the guy with the degree who thinks he's better than me because I don't have one yet.. but then I thought F$^k it....I'd bet 10-1 that I can beat the shi.t out of him anyways.
 
I am just saying why someone would spend $100,000 when you can get same thing at some small university for $25,000. I spent 25 gs and there were guys in my class that had spent 100 gs. Same thing same place same time for 75 more?.
 
If they discount you for getting that $25,000 degree, and say that the big name college means more, then the even better thing to do is to get the same degree that they paid $100,000 for and do it for the $25,000 - $30,000 range. Get your first two years done, get all your ratings, then finish up with Embry Riddle. They even give you credit for your flight time, and you don't have to pay for it. Gotta love it, $75,000 off. But then again, they are much better pilots then I am, so I better not rub it in.
 
Higher education should always be something to strive for. There is no reason why any of us should not want to raise the bar on our careers. Get out if you don't like it. Putting people down for doing the work involved in getting a degree (ie- Riddle) makes you sound bitter and small time.
 
I am not trying to put people down. I spent the time and effort to get that degree, and I am proud of the work I did. The point I was trying to make is it does not make you a better pilot. A degree is an excellent way of broadening your horizon, however, if you use it as a way to discriminate against your fellow pilots and feel that they are lowering the bar, you did not learn much from college. Also by requiring it at the regional level, it slows down the process for those of us that love to fly and would rather be in an airplane, learning from real life experiance, then sitting in a classroom and learning about other subjects. By getting into the industry 2 years earlier, it also allows you two more years in your career which at current pay rates, could be $300,000 - $600,000.
 
Quote by Killjack.

" Riddle me this BATMAN" - why do three out of the four military flight schools require a four year degree?"



Next time you happen to meet an WWII veteran pilot, ask him what his major was in before he was sent off to flight school.
 
Herman Bloom said:
"Okay fine, so I may not know what it's like to get wasted at a Frat house and go streaking through the Quad."

Come off it. If that's what you think college is all about, well then maybe its a very good thing you didn't waste anybody's time by attending one.

Fight it all you want, but the bottom line is that a college degree helps one get along in life. Not having one doesn't make you a bad person, and none of this has any bearing on flying skills in general. I just don't see how it could hurt the profession to require that airline pilots earn a degree first.

Doctors, Lawyers, TEACHERS...they all must complete a degree. Why shouldn't we?
I agree with you Herman.

The Florida and Arizona pilot mills can pump out all the non-college high school graduates that the industry will ever need. Why would any airline manager ever pay a decent wage / benefit package to someone with this background? There will always be plenty more eager beavers in the pipeline and where else would they go anyway? Welcome to the world of the indentured servant. But at least you might get a shot at 15 minutes of fame if FlightSafety puts your picture in one of its magazine ads. College? Who needs it.
 
killjack said:
" Riddle me this BATMAN" - why do three out of the four military flight schools require a four year degree? Why do the Majority of the "Major Airlines" require or prefer, applicants with Four year degrees?
boxjockey said:
It's all about supply and demand, man!! The only reason airlines require a degree is to cut down the number of resumes they have to go through.
Ding, ding, ding...we have a winner!

Why should HR go through 20,000 resumes for a pilot position when they can go through maybe 5000 instead? By requiring a degree, it's a filter to weed out people HR arbitrarily deems unfit or unworthy.

Ever wonder why SWA doesn't require a degree? They figured out that sometimes the best pilot for the job doesn't necessarily have the degree. And last time I checked, SWA was one of THE places pilots want to get hired.

So, I guess all those pilots at SWA without a degree should resign now. :eek:

Later :D
 
killjack said:
I am not a big conspiracy guy, but--- I have noticed in the last 4-5 years at the so called "Regional Airlines" that the majority of the pilots being hired only have a two year degree or none at all? While I do not believe it takes a "Rocket Scientist" to fly these jets, I do prefer a college graduate at the controls. It gives the career and the profession a more respectable position, and the ability to demand a professional pay scale. I believe that the Airlines are actually looking at hiring the two year degree or no degree applicant to fly their jets. This will allow them credibitly with the NMB during negotiations to throw out - well only 25% of the pilots at XYZ airline have a 4 year degree. So we should look at non professional payscale - and turn this into, forever, a 60,000 a year job. Just a thought - KJ
All you need is a GED and a check for $10,000.00 and that should get you in the door.
 
SYXdude right on

Smart companies to do not let a piece of paper, that has nothing to do with flying an airplane, stand in the way of hiring the right pilot.
 
Last edited:
Degree-Not Required

I have undergraduate and graduate degrees and my own bias is in favor of a degree "requirement". I am not currently in a flying job, however. I'm posting to comment on licensing requirements. Some have commented on doctors, lawyers, teachers, etc. Degrees are required for licensure in those professions. The general eligibility requirements for the ATP, 61.153, do not currently include any formal (high school or college) education. Didn't the ATP eligibility requirements once include "high school or its equivalent"? Again, my own personal bias is in favor of degrees, and back when I was accumulating ratings and hours, a four year degree was required or strongly preferred by the majors and others. I am simply reminding all that the FARs, which govern pilot certification, do not require any diplomas or degrees. Obviously, higher education for pilots is a matter of personal choice and industry mandate or lack thereof.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom