Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Dal ae

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
no really really hahaha.

If a 10 year guy like myself cannot even get a bid to the 737-800 in NYC (followed by a 777 DTW choice) I seriously doubt any new hire will see anything other than an MD-88 or DC-9.
 
no really really hahaha.

If a 10 year guy like myself cannot even get a bid to the 737-800 in NYC (followed by a 777 DTW choice) I seriously doubt any new hire will see anything other than an MD-88 or DC-9.

73N A or B?
 
Intructordude is on here for entertainment....enjoy the fun but take it for what its worth...just somebody having fun.

A question that does come to mind.....what are going to be the junior bases now? Where are the MD-88 and DC-9 based with this latest bid? Where would new hires possibly end up?

I know the possible new hires later this year are just a plan and could easily change.
 
no really really hahaha.

If a 10 year guy like myself cannot even get a bid to the 737-800 in NYC (followed by a 777 DTW choice) I seriously doubt any new hire will see anything other than an MD-88 or DC-9.

I hope you're talking about 73N A. I'm an 07 hire and was asigned NYC 73NB as a new hire and could have gone back on this last bid.
 
Intructordude is on here for entertainment....enjoy the fun but take it for what its worth...just somebody having fun.

A question that does come to mind.....what are going to be the junior bases now? Where are the MD-88 and DC-9 based with this latest bid? Where would new hires possibly end up?

I know the possible new hires later this year are just a plan and could easily change.


MD-88 is ATL, NYC, CVG, MSP.

DC-9 is DTW, MEM, and MSP.

Newhires before people started going to the widebodies (DL sent newhires to 767, NW to the panel on the 747) last round went to 88's, 9's, 737s and 320s with a smattering of all bases.

edit: clarification
 
Last edited:
Thanks PCRJ, I would be happy to fly any of them, it would be nice to fly the old DC-9s before they retire it.
 
Thanks PCRJ, I would be happy to fly any of them, it would be nice to fly the old DC-9s before they retire it.


When we do actually start hiring- be it this year, next year or whenever- a few will get to go to it. The -30 and 40's are going away later this year, but the -50's will be around for at least 5 more years.
 
It is nice. It's a fun airplane. You grow more chest hair, and your "man parts" get bigger too, which is a nice bonus....

Awesome, I will lay off the Extenze as I don't want things out of control down there.

;)
 
copied....

Any recap of the SD pilot visit in MSP yesterday?

I missed the first 45 minutes, but here are some of the highlights of the meeting.


-Currently fat on pilots, but we will barely have enough to get us through July peak in flying. No plans for hiring this year, maybe next year.


copied from another place-
 
It would be helpful if when talking date of hire if you would post North or South. A NWA 2000 hire is next to a DAL 2007 hire. Or a Sen# rounded to the hundredth's.

Just a thought.

Baja.
 
I am a Delta - S 2000 hire. I was referring to 73N B.

Goggles,

If u were a S-2007 hire you couldn't have gone back unless it was a displacement off something else. I am #5 on the NYC MD-88B and had a bid in for NYC 765, 7ER, and 73N just to get something. The guys that got those categories were displaced in to them. Despite being junior to me, they got them from Displacements; no one junior to me got any of those on an AE, so that is why I am STILL f@#^*ing stuck.

It is a good plane and the Captains are cool; I just need a higher paying category.
 
I am a Delta - S 2000 hire. I was referring to 73N B.

Goggles,

If u were a S-2007 hire you couldn't have gone back unless it was a displacement off something else. I am #5 on the NYC MD-88B and had a bid in for NYC 765, 7ER, and 73N just to get something. The guys that got those categories were displaced in to them. Despite being junior to me, they got them from Displacements; no one junior to me got any of those on an AE, so that is why I am STILL f@#^*ing stuck.

It is a good plane and the Captains are cool; I just need a higher paying category.

Understood. Now I realize what they mean when they say, "VD's get processed before AE's."
 
I think in the scheme of things, it is a moving dart board. First AEs are awarded temporarily. The VDs (some with AEsget bumped out); then MDs and even more AE bidders get bumped from the award they temporarily had.
 
And last week they were stating new hires for fall. It is a moving target. Both timing and numbers are constantly changing.
 
Delta is not going to hire for 3 years..... Age 65, merger synergies (i.e. reduction of service means less supply, same demand, so the price just moves right on up), and outsourcing of jobs to regionals. On top of that, there are a lot of warm and fuzzies out there right now - that is because Delta has been trying to get one certificate and please every community/politician that moved along it's merger plan. How long will that last? who knows, but take the good with the bad. 4 years ago, things looked pretty bad (probably weren't as bad as they said because they suddenly have a lot of money to throw around consolidating the international airline industry). my .02.
 
Delta is not going to hire for 3 years..... Age 65, merger synergies (i.e. reduction of service means less supply, same demand, so the price just moves right on up), and outsourcing of jobs to regionals. On top of that, there are a lot of warm and fuzzies out there right now - that is because Delta has been trying to get one certificate and please every community/politician that moved along it's merger plan. How long will that last? who knows, but take the good with the bad. 4 years ago, things looked pretty bad (probably weren't as bad as they said because they suddenly have a lot of money to throw around consolidating the international airline industry). my .02.

Anderson and co wanted a one certificated as fast as they could and now they have. All departments have been spending money like drunken solders and that I'm sure will come to a close as soon as they put the NWA hats on..
 
And last week they were stating new hires for fall. It is a moving target. Both timing and numbers are constantly changing.

Just attended a Steve Dickson briefing in MSP and according to him and the Crew Resources director, the possibility of hiring this year is extremely unlikely. Even if we are perfectly staffed for this summer that means we are 20%-ish over staffed for the fall 2010.

That being said, watch oil prices, significant changes in the economy, and the JAL deal and the pilot staffing situation could possibly change. The May/June AE will be telling. The company is dragging their feet on this AE while closely watching the above said issues to determine how much flying we do this year / next.
 
Just attended a Steve Dickson briefing in MSP and according to him and the Crew Resources director, the possibility of hiring this year is extremely unlikely. Even if we are perfectly staffed for this summer that means we are 20%-ish over staffed for the fall 2010.

That being said, watch oil prices, significant changes in the economy, and the JAL deal and the pilot staffing situation could possibly change. The May/June AE will be telling. The company is dragging their feet on this AE while closely watching the above said issues to determine how much flying we do this year / next.


I know, they are wavering. On Jan 1st they stated hiring in fall of 2010 so they are mincing words.

From what I can tell they are prepping for opening the hiring cog.

I also agree that they are getting ready because of the JAL deal. It is a moving target so that makes their staffing needs a moving target. If you take the whole JAL deal out of it they will see a need for pilots in 2011.
 
Hiring would be nice, but I'm pretty happy with status quo in the near term. The fact that we haven't furloughed is amazing and very beneficial to me.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top