TonyC
Frederick's Happy Face
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2002
- Posts
- 3,050
General Lee said:. . . I am sure that something can be written that would ensure something. . .
Yeah, me too!

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
General Lee said:. . . I am sure that something can be written that would ensure something. . .
Man, you beat me to the punch! This is exactly my understanding of how an agreement would be crafted. A lot of folks here are talking about "contract" pilots taking flying away from seniority list pilots. That's not now I see it. The flying will still be done by seniority list pilots, as they are still active. As you mentioned above, pilots in critical categories will commit to a retirement on a NLT date within the time frame agreed upon. His lump sum will either be protected until his retirement date or distributed using the timeline associated with the date he submitted his retirement papers. He continues to fly in his category until the agreed upon date, allowing DAL the ability to train someone to fill in the vacated position. And, you are also correct about there being only 3 767-400 sims in the world. CAL, DAL, and Boeing. As a side note, I remember in September, 2003 when we had 283 retirements, APD's were flying the left seat of the -400. None had the seniority to hold the position.FDJ2 said:TonyC you are right. I think it will be interesting, to say the least, to see what emerges from negotiations. One scenario I would not have as much heartburn over would be allowing a Delta seniority list pilot in a critical category to cash in on his lump sum prior to his scheduled retirement date. IOW, A 767-400 Captain would state on September 30th his intention to retire NLT February 1st, giving the company a maximum of 4 months to fill his seat. The pilot would receive his lump sum as if he had retired October 1st, but he would retain his Delta seniority pending his actual retirement which would be either the date a Delta pilot can replace him or February 1st whichever is earlier. Any adjustments to his lump sum due to a change in his FAE would be made payable on February 1st. This would mean that the 767-400 is still flown by a DAL seniority list pilot, the pilot would still get his lump sum pay out in case the company attempts to terminate the pension during a BK filing (the biggest concern of most retiring DAL pilots) and the 767-400 would still be flying. Just thinking out loud, so shoot away.
TonyC said:You remind me of the JetBlue guys that argued that exemptions to FAR Duty Limits would only apply to them. HA! Can a woman be a virgin who has already lost her virginity?!?! How can you set a precedent without setting a precedent?!?!? Once you've made history, you cannot go back and erase it. What kind of Koolaid are YOU drinking now, General!?!
Gonna change bankruptcy law, too??? This I gotta see.
If Delta needs to retain the Captains, Delta needs to provide the incentive for them to stay, and that incentive should NOT come out of the hide of the OTHER pilots at Delta.
This reminds me of the saying:
Failure to plan on YOUR part does not constitute an emergency on MY part.
We can tell you have 400 hours.Pilot Doc said:If the 767-400 fleet is shut down by retirements, those planes would be available for training. Expensive, but available.
JohnQ said:What kind of delusional fantasy world are you living in? Do you think for one nanosecond that Delta pilots are losing sleep thinking:"gee, maybe a FedEx pilot doesn't agree with an interim agreement that we may make with the company."
Here is news for you: neither I, nor any other Delta pilot, really cares what YOU think. For that matter, all pilots industry-wide need to get out of this socialist, pseudo-communist mentality that pilots at other carriers somehow owe them something. We at DAL owe you nothing--and you at FedEx owe us nothing. I do not owe you high pay rates, you do not owe me great vacation rules, I do not owe you company paid dry cleaning (I actually had a guy tell me--apparantly with a straight face--that that was an essential contractual issue for him), etc. etc.
Get a life and worry about YOUR pilot group and YOUR company. We will worry about ours.
Delta guy.
First things first. I violated my cardinal rule regarding any post, submission, etc.--I did not wait five minutes and reread before hitting "post." So, in hindsight I do appear somewhat uptight--I swear I am not. No meds here, and no, I am not on vacation with too much time on my hand.TonyC said:Let me guess: you're on vacation, and you decided to take a holiday from the meds, too.
General Lee looses no sleep worrying about me, and I loose none about him. We can, however, exchange ideas and opinions all day long without getting all snotty and selfish about it. Judging by your post count of 2, I'm guessing you haven't figured that out yet, and I'll cut you a break.
Nice attitude.
Apology accepted - - been there, done that.JohnQ said:First things first. I violated my cardinal rule regarding any post, submission, etc.--I did not wait five minutes and reread before hitting "post." So, in hindsight I do appear somewhat uptight--I swear I am not. No meds here, and no, I am not on vacation with too much time on my hand.
Therefore, I take back my (unnecessarily) insulting words, such as "get a life" "delusionary fantasy world," etc. In fact, I apologize.
However, in a more moderate tone: why do you care what other pilots groups are doing? I think airline pilots spend far too much time worrying about the other pilot groups (what will UAL pilots do?) when they need to worry about issues far closer to home . . .
Is this a better tone of conversation? BTW, you will probably not see posts from me in double digits.
Translation:JohnQ said:...why do you care what other pilots groups are doing? I think airline pilots spend far too much time worrying about the other pilot groups (what will UAL pilots do?) when they need to worry about issues far closer to home. It goes both ways, by the way. While you do not owe me anything, neither does Fred Smith owe my CEO anything. If Fred can afford to pay you a lot more (and he can), then more power to you. I hope you get a lot more. If you as a pilot group decide that certain pay and workrules are what you find appropriate--even if I would personally not--then that is all that matters.
General, I don't think Davie is a pilot. For that matter, I don't think he was a SEAL either. I think Davie is a wannabe.General Lee said:Come on Davie, I know you are mad, but you are getting ridiculous. Our MEC and senior guys could have done a lot of things to make your life worse---like not including Cobra and not fighting for your recalls.
Bye Bye--General Lee
TonyC said:Food for thought...
Has Delta cranked up the training pipeline to fill the gap left by retiring Captains?
If they haven't, it must not be a problem. And if it's not a problem, it must be a tool to divide the pilots.
It looks like the dividing has begun...
DALPA has a responsibility to entertain the Company's proposal, and it has a responsibility to find the truth in the midst of lies, distortions, noise, and clutter.
A responsible manager, IMHO, would be beefing up training rather than waiting, hoping that the Collective Bargaining Agreement (the "contract") might be amended to "fix" the shortfall. It's no surprise that there appears to be an absence of responsible management.
Post deleted by author.Freebrd said:Hmmm, Dave writes that he was USN, and flew C130 Combat talons? Didn't know the Navy flew the beast....or maybe, if he's a SEAL, he's jumped out of 'em. That I would buy.