Slim said:
While he can't vote, he has enough input to kill an agreement, should one be approved by this pilot group.
So, FlyChicaga, ALPA National leadership has a role in this.
Why should he kill an agreement? If it is voted upon by the majority membership of the pilot group, then he is saying "Ok, this is what
you want, then this is what
you get." It may not be in the best interest of the piloting profession as a whole, but he is backing the membership and their decisions.
I'm not saying that ALPA leadership is not partly to blame. What's going on is these pilot groups infighting within ALPA, each trying to undercut each other with pay and work rule concessions to get the upper hand. Instead of the leadership saying, "Enough is enough, let's think about this" they are backing the decisions of each group.
So which is better? Be supportive of the decisions of the ALPA membership on their own futures, or take an authoritative role and direct the groups where they (leadership) think we need to go?
Basically, would you rather dictate your own future, or would you like it to be chosen for you by Dwane Woerth et al?
I'd rather have a say in dictating my own future in this career, with the strength and backing of ALPA. The only problem is, the collective membership of various pilot groups seem to think the only way to go is backwards... so, what to do? Honestly, the best answer is to educate. But there isn't much of that going on. We are all too busy scrambling to fight for our piece of the pie, only looking out for #1.