Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Comair and Expressjet Pilots Hate RAH?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
WateryGrave said:
Wow I sure hope the Shi**y Kitty buys Clownair. Can you imagine how much fun we will all have!!

Actually the latest rumor is that CHQ is buying XJT.
 
I seem to remember a lot of Comair and Expressjet guys being called scabs and worse by mainline during their PFT days. I'm sure the DL and CO guys are getting a kick out of watching Comair and Expressjet guys accuse others of "stealing" their flying. The sooner you realize we are all expendable hired guns the better. The solution for this is for all of the flying to be flown by mainline crews, which will get rid of the whipsaw we see now. Not saying this has a snowballs chance in hell of happening, as that horse left the barn a long time ago.

If Republic buys Comair this will really get interesting. Wonder how many of the Comair guys will walk rather than work for such a substandard airline?
 
Indy319FA said:
Wonder how many of the Comair guys will walk rather than work for such a substandard airline?

Decisions like that are made at the dinner table, a la MidAtlantic. Not a flame, a fact.
 
Uncle Bunkle said:
Now where can I get me one of those? Seriously, I'll wear one too.
Yeah Yeah boss, can i wear one too, no really boss can I wear one too
 
SennaP1 said:
Ah Come on...If it were only that easy.:rolleyes:

It is that easy, chief. I mean, if you're going to get reassigned (which I never have), its probably just going to be an extra turn and you're going to get junior man pay for it, so most people would probably jump on it anyway. As far as getting junior manned on your day off, there are so many ways to prevent that from happening its not even funny. Primarily just don't answer the dammed phone. Whether we have junior manning at XJT or not is really not a big deal since it happens so rarely and when it does, we are compensated well for it and have our days off restored if need be.

The hot items for me are vacations and 100% deadhead pay at block or better. These are things that add significant value to our contract. There's nothing like sleeping in the back of a 767 sitting on the taxiways in EWR and getting paid for every minute of it.
 
Last edited:
Indy319FA said:
I seem to remember a lot of Comair and Expressjet guys being called scabs and worse by mainline during their PFT days.

You mean back in the day before XJT existed when there were nothing but props and a couple of jets on property while PFT was an accepted practice at almost every "commuter" airline in existance? Why would mainline care about guys paying to get a job flying an E120 around from EWR to ACK?
 
$$$4nothin said:
I have not and will not EVER lower my head. I don't care who is walking by. I have never met a CHQ pilot who has or would do this either. If my badge is turned around you will see my NOGOJETS badge, and when that $1500 check comes in December I won't think of you. Go flame on some other board

And when I get my $6000 profit share check, and that $7000 for retirement, or that W2 at the end of there year, or that 60 days of vacation fully paid I wont think of you either.
 
SkyBoy1981 said:
It is that easy, chief.

Thanks Tanto, but I know all about junior-manning and how to avoid it, thanks to a previous employer. I was just commenting on your lame, cracklin' radio excuse.

Good luck to you guys. Seriously, I hope we all come out of this on top.
 
ERJDRVR said:
How is that JR manning going for you??

I have not been Jr manned since this contract was signed, however, there are times when that would be fine with me. They must pay me 150%, provide positive space travel and restore my day. Nothing wrong with any of that. You guys are hung up on this whole jr man thing like its an extra $5 bucks an hour or something. Did RAH jr man that much before you guys signed that this provision is so important to you? It's not a problem for us.
 
$$$4nothin said:
I have not and will not EVER lower my head. I don't care who is walking by. I have never met a CHQ pilot who has or would do this either. If my badge is turned around you will see my NOGOJETS badge, and when that $1500 check comes in December I won't think of you. Go flame on some other board

Well the Christmas bonus thing is certainly a nice touch, and us XJT folks get something similar I quess, my profit sharing ckeck this year was a bit over 3 grand. There is alot more to this thing than pay rates. But anyway good luck to all, remember, fee for departure flying is a loser in the long run. We should all be looking for the exit. RAH's days on top will be numbered. That is how this side of our industry works. Not slaming anyone, that's just the facts of life in the little airplane business.
 
StarChecker said:
I honestly know that we cancelled 82 flights the second Friday in June for lack of crews. I didn't have to worry about being extended into my day off.

Must suck having to worry about hearing "Call crew scheduling" over Ops.

When I set the brake....I'm done.

Seriously, that poor of a completion factor WILL cause issues with CAL, I promise. I'm sure your mgt team will be looking to improve such an important metric in this business, not to mention that "fee for departure" means just that. No departure, no fee. Adios
 
SennaP1 said:
Do you think United/AA/NWA/DAL/U guys are over on the Majors board, telling a story about how they saw a JetBlue/Spirit/SWA/..etc.. guy at Subway that had to eat 2 subs and his shirt was untucked.

What has this become?

no probably not, they usually complain about Jetblue bringing the industry down with thier pay rates and being non-union, then the Jutblue guys will talk about how they are denied the jumpseat..... sounds kinda familar I guess pilots are pilots no matter what
 
I've read all of the thread and I have this too say....

I was not at CHQ during the last negotiations but I'm glad that I'm here now.
I may not have 100% DH pay but I'll take 75% at captain pay over 100% at FO pay. Is it short sighted? Yes. But I'm smart enough to see that this sector in the industry is completely f*cked. I got my quick upgrade and I'm gonna die trying to get the hell out. If I can't oh well, its better than being an FO for 6 years at some sh*t regional(they all are) with my 'pride'.

Flame away bitches
 
marcal said:
I've read all of the thread and I have this too say....

I was not at CHQ during the last negotiations but I'm glad that I'm here now.
I may not have 100% DH pay but I'll take 75% at captain pay over 100% at FO pay. Is it short sighted? Yes. But I'm smart enough to see that this sector in the industry is completely f*cked. I got my quick upgrade and I'm gonna die trying to get the hell out. If I can't oh well, its better than being an FO for 6 years at some sh*t regional(they all are) with my 'pride'.

Flame away bitches

XJT upgrades are currently more junior than at CHQ (7/2004 DOH). Sure, it could and most likely will increase...but so could yours.
 
Last edited:
SkyBoy1981 said:
You mean back in the day before XJT existed when there were nothing but props and a couple of jets on property while PFT was an accepted practice at almost every "commuter" airline in existance?


Actually there were plenty of companies in the 90s that were non PFT. Comair and Co Ex were the exception and PFT was not the rule.

Why would mainline care about guys paying to get a job flying an E120 around from EWR to ACK

If they had cared, we would not be in the position of seeing more and more mainline jobs outsourced to other companies. Until mainline employees force their unions to demand that if the aircraft says Continental on the side of it (not picking on CO, just using them for an example), then it has a Continental mainline crew, then none of this will get better. Until mainline employees are willing to take the chance of shutting the company down permanently to get this fixed, it will be a problem. I don't care if its a 172 or a 777. If it says Continental, then the crew should work for Continental and be on their seniority list. When these concessionary contracts come up for renegotiation, the reps should demand the integration of all flying outsourced to other companies. If this is not done, then the rest of the contract is meaningless because managment will continue to find ways to outsource. The one positive thing you can say about Republic is we have been able to keep all of our flying on one Seniority list to keep BB from whipsawing us against each other.


To see pilots from regionals argue about somebody "stealing" their flying is comical. It was stolen when it was taken from mainline.
 
Indy319FA said:
Actually there were plenty of companies in the 90s that were non PFT. Comair and Co Ex were the exception and PFT was not the rule.

ASA and quite a few others had PFT programs in the late 90's. It certainly was not limited to Comair and CoEx. Also, we're talking about $8000 for the cost of training to become a full time pilot with the strong possibility of a 6 month upgrade, not $30k for 250 hours in the right seat like exists with PFT outfits today. I'm not advocating it, but there is quite a difference.

Indy319FA said:
If they had cared, we would not be in the position of seeing more and more mainline jobs outsourced to other companies.

I agree completely, but you implied in your original post that mainline pilots were concerned enough about the turboprop flying PFTers that they were calling them "scabs". Maybe I'm wrong, but I highly doubt that was the case.

Indy319FA said:
To see pilots from regionals argue about somebody "stealing" their flying is comical. It was stolen when it was taken from mainline.

Its not about the flying as much with me as it is taking jobs away from other pilots. When one company with a more valuable contract has to lay off pilots because another company with cheaper labor costs comes in and takes the work away from them, then yes, its a problem. You would have to be blind not to see that. I realize that the same thing has been done in some cases to mainline pilots, and no, that isn't right either. I don't work for a company that is flying mini 737's around on former legacy routes for a legacy carrier that has pilots on furlough though. That would be you.
 
Last edited:
I realize that the same thing has been done in some cases to mainline pilots, and no, that isn't right either. I don't work for a company that is flying mini 737's around on former legacy routes for a legacy carrier that has pilots on furlough though. That would be you.

No you're flying for a company that is flying ERJ 145 LRs on routes that should be flown by mainline aircraft. Its apples and oranges. If you are flying a jet for a regional carrier, then you are "stealing" flying from mainline. If its a 145, CRJ, or 170 it makes no difference. You're trying to make yourself feel better by denying the fact that you have stolen flying from somebody else. Two regional pilots getting into an argument over who is stealing flying is silly, and until all the flying gets back to mainline where it belongs, you will continue to see flying shifted around to different companies to keep them bidding against each other. If the current trends continue, in ten years or so there will be no more mainline, just a brand name with a bunch of contractors constantly bidding against each other for the flying.
 
Indy319FA said:
No you're flying for a company that is flying ERJ 145 LRs on routes that should be flown by mainline aircraft. Its apples and oranges. If you are flying a jet for a regional carrier, then you are "stealing" flying from mainline. If its a 145, CRJ, or 170 it makes no difference. You're trying to make yourself feel better by denying the fact that you have stolen flying from somebody else. Two regional pilots getting into an argument over who is stealing flying is silly, and until all the flying gets back to mainline where it belongs, you will continue to see flying shifted around to different companies to keep them bidding against each other. If the current trends continue, in ten years or so there will be no more mainline, just a brand name with a bunch of contractors constantly bidding against each other for the flying.

As I said before, my concern is with pilots losing their jobs at the benefit of another pilot group with a less valuable contract, not just pilot groups losing flying or growth potential. How many CAL pilots are on furlough because we took their flying? How many XJT pilots would be on furlough if you all would have gotten hold of those 69 airplanes? How many UAL and DAL pilots are on furlough while you fly around doing IAD-IAH in that 170?

I whole heartedly agree that all jet flying should be at mainline. I also believe that we should all have a single seniority list and a single pay scale for all aircraft types at all carriers. Bottom line is, it ain't gonna happen.
 
Last edited:
How many CAL pilots are on furlough because we took their flying?

To follow your logic, how many more pilots would Continental be hiring if you weren't taking their flying?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top