gunfyter
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2002
- Posts
- 3,785
Since his name is a number ... his Boss's name is also likely a number ... and that number is 6-6-6.:laugh:Who do you work for B19??? Does anyone know?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since his name is a number ... his Boss's name is also likely a number ... and that number is 6-6-6.:laugh:Who do you work for B19??? Does anyone know?
Actually B hasn't been correct. He posts factual errors about the NJA contract and will not admit that he was incorrect. His reasoning that the union contract at NJA was responsible for furloughs has been disproven many times. He originally said that NJA would furlough more people in terms of % than the other companys, then later changed his "prediction" to total number of pilots. When I called him out on that, no response. Go figure.
So Mr smarty pants. Explain this to me. How is it the pilot unions fault for the wages obtained in the 2005 contract? The COMPANY had to also agree to this. What part of THE COMPANY HAD TO AGREE do you have such a hard time understanding?
4 Sevens,
I am sorry. 19 is not correct. He is a misrepresenter of the facts:
19 declared certain things would occur because of the presence of Unions. This is eminently not the case.
Its like the democrats declaring disaster would strike because of George Bush and when Katrina hit saying ... " See we told you!"
Now when a large portion of your customers work in the NY financial industry which gets hit with a financial storm ... will those people let their homes go into foreclosure ... it will they return their Jets to a company that has a return policy similar to the Policy COSTCO has when I return an consumer electronics device?
Many of our passengers have suffered financial loss and therefore returned their planes. When this happens there is less demand for pilots. This is not related in any way shape or form to whether these pilots are union or non-union.
B-19 has never demonstrated how the union has anything to do with the need for reduction in force.
Does it really matter?
I don't agree with everything he posts, but he does at least think about things before he puts it on the board.
It seems that people like attacking him more than discussing pertinent topics.
The message board are normally very quiet until he post a message.
Sure, B. Just keep telling yourself that. There, there. It's alright.
Agreed.
B-19 has been kicking their pompous union loving asses all over this board for quite some time. It has been quite impressive, actually. When you consider it is ONE against 20 to 30 or so regulars.
They have lost their argument with him and the furloughs (just heard from a NetJet pilot another is on the way) prove it. If B-19 continues on his streak, they will be opening the contract and that will be the final stake in their union loving hearts.
How bout them Unions! Surrender your silly argument....B-19 won! Get over it!
Hey B19, did you check the LoonyTunes clip? Some coincidence, huh? I knew you would get a laugh!
Yes... how could I not? I wish I was that clever.
It's the unions fault for not adjusting the contract as the economy changes. Unions are notorious for pushing a fixed cost contract to the brink of bankruptcy before the contract is opened to adjust to the proper downsizing of the company to match the economy. How many non-union jobs were shed before the union jobs were? The entire company is placed into turmoil, not just the pilot's union. If not for B-H, you'd all be out of work right now.
It IS the unions fault because the company is unable to adjust for the rapid changed within the business model demanded by the economy.
Here once again you proved the facts you post are incorrect. More Union jobs were lost than Non Union jobs.
Also, FLOPS laid off 200+ NON UNION pilots
B19 = 7777