Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Buffett Bites Back at NetJets Pilot Complaints

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
NJ is still interviewing and rejecting qualified pilots, they will fill those empty posts within the limitations of the training system, to absorb new pilots. NJ is still a much better job for many pilots.

From what I'm seeing this won't happen. Over the last 15 years the majority of NetJets new hires have come from, Comair (most left during their strike), Midway (went out of business), Emery (went out of business), early-out/retired legacy and regional F/o's that were tired of waiting on an upgrade and commuting. Unless there is another large block of pilots coming from an airline shutdown NetJets has seen and sifted through the largest stack of resumes they will see.

As for training, they are going to have to drop their 121 program to even have a chance to catch up. It is a great concept with poor implementation and zero contingency planning. Add to that a fleet renewal program that will see 10-20% of the current pilot force going through initials every year going forward and you can see how perfectly good aircraft will sit idle.

If I were to be "CEO for a day" my first order of business would be to repair my relationship with my internal/external customers and vendors. NetJets needs to stop the trend of customers and employees leaving. We need every one of them.

You are right, NetJets isn't the worst job out there, but I have always been a person that believes striving to be the best is the only way to live my life. At one point in my career NetJets had a good future for me. That time has come and gone. NetJets has proven to be a dead end and it's time to move on irregardless of how good the next contact is.
 
In your airline world this makes perfect sense, but not here. NJ is not an airline, it's a Frac, and your #3 bullet is not a viable business strategy in the Frax market. First off, they're a Berkshire subsidiary, and the cost to the BRK stock due to loss of confidence if one of their companies declared bankruptcy would outweigh any labor savings. Secondly, any Frac that declares bankruptcy would be toast in the market, which is all about confidence from their customers. The customers own most of the assets, and they need confidence that they won't be screwed when they buy a multi-million dollar share of an airplane. A Frac can't win back customers by offering $99 fares to Orlando. Customer service does matter here, and I can think of 2 good examples of CEO's who've almost ruined a company by trying to run it like an airline. Options had the first, now it looks like NJ has another.

While I agree with most of your post, the comment about a BRK company declaring bankruptcy and resulting in a loss of confidence is off the mark.

The very namesake of Berkshire Hathaway was a textile mill that Buffett bought back in the 1960's and went out of business in 1985. That bankruptcy had zero impact on the trust and confidence in Berkshire Hathaway, Warren Buffett, or the BRK stock price.

I could see your point if a major company like Geico or BNSF went out of business under the Berkshire watch, but a small niche player like NJ would have zero impact. Buffett would simply chalk it up as one of his mistakes and move on.
 
While I agree with most of your post, the comment about a BRK company declaring bankruptcy and resulting in a loss of confidence is off the mark.

The very namesake of Berkshire Hathaway was a textile mill that Buffett bought back in the 1960's and went out of business in 1985. That bankruptcy had zero impact on the trust and confidence in Berkshire Hathaway, Warren Buffett, or the BRK stock price.

I could see your point if a major company like Geico or BNSF went out of business under the Berkshire watch, but a small niche player like NJ would have zero impact. Buffett would simply chalk it up as one of his mistakes and move on.

That was Berkshire Hathaway (the holding company) shutting down one of its plants, not a separately-held subsidiary company declaring bankruptcy. I agree that WB will not hesitate to shut down or sell off a business once he decides it's not profitable and not likely to be, and there are further examples of that. And I think we agree that it's foolish to think that he would never sell off or shut down NJ (wasn't a thread topic sometime back?).

But PCL talked about the airline tactic of threatening a structured bankruptcy to shed debt and annul labor contracts. BRK letting a subsidiary declare its insolvency and inability to pay its financial obligations, I don't think WB would let that happen. As a subsidiary of BRK, is NJA separately filing for bankruptcy even an option?
 
Last edited:
But PCL talked about the airline tactic of threatening a structured bankruptcy to shed debt and annul labor contracts. BRK letting a subsidiary declare its insolvency and inability to pay its financial obligations, I don't think WB would let that happen. As a subsidiary of BRK, is NJA separately filing for bankruptcy even an option?

I agree, I don't think Buffett would do that.

Buffett will stand behind his debts. He's backstopped NJ in the past and would likely do so again if they ran into trouble. If he believed NJ was a long term money loser he would probably wind down operation ala citation air and just exit the business.

That said, NJ is a good business. It's made money despite its many inefficiencies. Even Jordan in all of his incompetence has managed to turn a profit.
 
Last edited:
You bring up some valid points in this thread, but I have to disagree with you.

In the current market, I have a hard time believing that it will be so easy to hire 1000+ pilots willing to cross a picket line and forever have their names on a scab list.

Our hiring department isn't exactly firing on all cylinders right now. We had a guy show up to class that was very well qualified, but didn't have an ATP, which is a requirement. I just read on another message board that some people's apps were deleted because we switched website vendors. The applicants didn't learn about this from NJA, but from someone posting on a message board.

I believe that in the contract with the owners, it states our pilots will have 2500 hrs minimum. So grabbing 300 hr guys fresh out of school that may not understand the ramifications of crossing a picket line are out.

TMC just unionized, so I doubt they'll be available for excess lift.

I'm not saying it's going to be easy to get a good contract with the current EMT, but I think we have a bit more leverage than you think.

The fact that TMC has a union now won't be a player short term for not having extra lift. What WILL be a player in TMC not having extra lift is that TMC is so short crews right now that they can't cover their OWN lift!
Guys are leaving here in DROVES. Had 6 FS training slots... 2 showed. Another 6 scheduled 0 showed. The pool of applicants with the time needed to fly at TMC or Netjets is drying up quickly! It started at the cargo haulers, has now moved to TMC and will eventually affect NetJets. It's a fire burning uphill. I can guarantee if I was a NetJets owner Id be right pissed if my asset had been so poorly managed that I was being flown by random P135. What's the advantage of ownership if my flight is contracted to an "inferior" company?
 
But PCL talked about the airline tactic of threatening a structured bankruptcy to shed debt and annul labor contracts. BRK letting a subsidiary declare its insolvency and inability to pay its financial obligations, I don't think WB would let that happen.

That's not what I suggested. I suggested that the mere threat of it would cause most of your pilot group to collapse like a cheap Walmart lawn chair. And it would.

As a subsidiary of BRK, is NJA separately filing for bankruptcy even an option?

Yes.
 
By definition, you are being compensated for what your skills and experience are worth.

Bob

And what you negotiate. Your skills and experience could be possibly worth more, but if poorly negotiated, you're working at a discount...and vice versa.
 
That's not what I suggested. I suggested that the mere threat of it would cause most of your pilot group to collapse like a cheap Walmart lawn chair. And it would.

You might know the RLA, but you clearly don't know the Frax industry. NJ won't threaten bankruptcy, because everyone but you knows it's an empty threat. So the pilot group might fall down laughing, but they wouldn't "collapse" as you claim. Management will try a number of other tactics to break the pilots' solidarity, but that won't be one.

And I did say you were talking about "the airline tactic of threatening a structured bankruptcy," so that's exactly what you suggested. You could at least read the post before making your rebuttal.
 
Last edited:
I am constantly astounded by the degradation of working conditions, compensation, respect, and pay disparity for pilots as the demand for qualified dedicated experienced flight crews increases. The demand for experienced pilots are at record levels. Constantly getting emails from rishworth aviation and vor holdings for pilots offering 23k a month with commutable scheduling. Do I think netjet pilots are overpaid, hell no. Do I think flops and tmc pilots are extremely undervalued and underpaid? Hell yes. So let's have a strike. Ha, good luck with that. Solidarity, solidarity, and a little more solidarity. Bring the pressure to bear, that will affect change. Circle the wagons. Us against them. It doesn't get any clearer than that. I want to kick Ricci so hard in the nuts he has to sell six of his houses and take a greyhound bus down to his villa in cabo. Reason and past experience tells me that will not be possible until every one of us says, ******************** it I've had enough. Netjets pilots have my full support and I wish you all the best of luck
 
I really wish you guys and the union would stop talking about this point. It would only be a valid point if all you were asking for was to keep your current "sub-standard" contract, because clearly aome are not happy with it. Fighting for dramatic improvements in every area is hardly the status quo.

Disclaimer: i do not think asking for concessions are appropriate...in 2010, perhaps, but not now.

You must have missed the rest of the industry, which has been seeing significant contract improvements in the last few years. Of course we aren't seeking status quo!
 
Last edited:
By definition, you are being compensated for what your skills and experience are worth.

Bob
Wrong! We are compensated for how hard we leverage the company into paying us, which when we vote on a TA should be no less than $250,000.
 
Yes, and the company is seeking a change that would bring it more in line with industry norms.

But what is the industry? If you believe Netjets, we define what "the industry" is due to our size and market share. If that's the case, then we have the industry norms by definition.

Does "the industry" include the major airlines? That's fine, but if so, we're due one hell of a huge pay raise to bring us "in line with industry norms."

They don't get to have it both ways.
 
They don't get to have it both ways.

I think you're going to be surprised at what the NMB thinks they get to have.
 
And the hiring boom will continue regardless because it's mostly age retirements, not new flying.

The schedule will not be met without huge amounts of sell offs.

The end.
 
But what is the industry? If you believe Netjets, we define what "the industry" is due to our size and market share. If that's the case, then we have the industry norms by definition.

Does "the industry" include the major airlines? That's fine, but if so, we're due one hell of a huge pay raise to bring us "in line with industry norms."

They don't get to have it both ways.
Sorry to everyone else, but respectfully, WE ARE the industry. We are bigger than all our competitors COMBINED. Whatever we say the industry norms are is what they are, so I don't give a hoot about the NMB says.
 
Sorry to everyone else, but respectfully, WE ARE the industry. We are bigger than all our competitors COMBINED. Whatever we say the industry norms are is what they are, so I don't give a hoot about the NMB says.

Hmmmm... that sounds vaguely familiar. Didn't a bunch of US Air East pilots feel the same way? Aren't they still waiting for a new contract?

Like it or not, what the NMB says will matter and will have a profound impact on your lives.
 
If I were to be "CEO for a day" my first order of business would be to repair my relationship with my internal/external customers and vendors. NetJets needs to stop the trend of customers and employees leaving. We need every one of them.

You have my vote. That's exactly what needs to happen. Unfortunately the only way this will occur is when Jordan is shown the door.
 
And what you negotiate. Your skills and experience could be possibly worth more, but if poorly negotiated, you're working at a discount...and vice versa.

The minute you come to work at a stated rate of pay you have established your worth. Fair Market Value is defined as what a buyer pays a willing seller. You are the seller who willingly supplies your service.

If you have a problem with your pay I recommend starting with the mirror.

Bob
 
The minute you come to work at a stated rate of pay you have established your worth. Fair Market Value is defined as what a buyer pays a willing seller. You are the seller who willingly supplies your service.

If you have a problem with your pay I recommend starting with the mirror.

Bob

Or wait for the contract to be up and re negotiate.

It's the equivalent of looking in the mirror.
 
Hmmmm... that sounds vaguely familiar. Didn't a bunch of US Air East pilots feel the same way? Aren't they still waiting for a new contract?

Like it or not, what the NMB says will matter and will have a profound impact on your lives.

USair east guys did NOT own +65% of the market. Apples and oranges.
 
The minute you come to work at a stated rate of pay you have established your worth. Fair Market Value is defined as what a buyer pays a willing seller. You are the seller who willingly supplies your service.

If you have a problem with your pay I recommend starting with the mirror.

Bob

That's funny... I was under the impression is was all about supply and demand. High demand on oil with low quantities... Price goes up. High demand for qualified CEO's or College Football coaches... Price goes up. The shortage started burning it's way through the cargo carriers, has made its way to the Part 135 companies, and is starting to lick at the heels of the Fractionals.

CEO's renegotiate their contracts, coaches renegotiate theirs, time for pilots to do the same. The reflection in the mirror is crystal hoss. Lol
 
USair east guys did NOT own +65% of the market. Apples and oranges.


The fact that NJ controls 65+% of the market is a negative for you and your argument. The NMB is all about preventing national disruptions in the transportation space. The fact that NJ controls a majority share of the industry just means it will get greater scrutiny.
 
Nmb ain't gonna do a damn thing for you guys. I think family guy is related to twinky the kid. It's all past, present, and future. Bring the pressure to bear. You have a desirable product, you have market share, you have a looming pilot shortage. Fly the pledge. The nmb will get you no where
 
Dock workers can strike, tug boat drivers can strike, cargo ship captains can strike but as far as the nmb is concerned hell will freeze over before they let pilots strike again. You would have more success lobbying for nlrb law reformation than counting on being released to strike. Apply the appropriate pressure where needed
 
$46k starting FO pay and a choice of 5 bases....:confused:

That was during a time when airlines were furloughing and we were the only place hiring.

New hire pay we were able to increase to what the 1998 CBA had as 3 rd year PIC pay. We should be able to do better than that this time. New hire pay will be higher than current yr 3 PIC pay
 
That's funny... I was under the impression is was all about supply and demand. High demand on oil with low quantities... Price goes up. High demand for qualified CEO's or College Football coaches... Price goes up. The shortage started burning it's way through the cargo carriers, has made its way to the Part 135 companies, and is starting to lick at the heels of the Fractionals.

CEO's renegotiate their contracts, coaches renegotiate theirs, time for pilots to do the same. The reflection in the mirror is crystal hoss. Lol

No sir, that is reality.

Again, the minute you accept substandard wages you are the problem. By your own statement, you accepted what you determined to be substandard (or, more charitably, less than what you believe you are worth).

Arguing that I/we will negotiate rates up belies the fact that YOU have already set the bar lower when you started at the lower rate.

It is not about what MAY happen but what HAS happened.

Good luck,
Bob
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom