Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Brutal IPC

  • Thread starter Thread starter TDTURBO
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 7

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
avbug said:
Always good to hear from an expert in the field. An expert with lots of experience in his own single engine piston airplane doing private flying. I know you're an expert, because you keep telling us all so...after all, that IS the point of this thread.

You ought to know.

People die doing many things, td. Fighting fire to gardening, arresting felons to choking on pumpkin seeds. Whatever the outcome, (as an aside, you may have noticed that I'm far from dead yet), I'm deeply grateful and fortunate to be able to be doing what I do, "expendable," or not.

Your character is clear, and that's what's important in this thread.

Why you and Phil have always made it pretty clear who the "experts" are. I agree, it's always good to hear from one in the feild, you just ain't one of 'em.;)

Since the "point" of this thread has escaped you, it is about getting a Brutal IPC, hence the title. When you learn to read and comprehend all at the same time you can then comment. In the mean time you offer nothing as usual. Goodbye!
 
Last edited:
avbug said:
Hold the phone. You have less then ten thousand hours...a lot less. And you fly around single engine piston engine airplanes in icing conditions for which SIGMETs are provided...without known ice.

In other words, you just don't want to fly with someone like yourself. Got it. None of us would.



I am where I am by learning from others with more experience than I, not from some babbling idiot that claims to be someone he isn't, now do you get it?
 
I hear there is a great BBQ joint out there, Carsons?

Lots of equipment in a plane is lots of fun for some of us CFIIs. There are certain failure combinations that can really keep a pilot working. There are some normal operation combinations that can also keep a pilot working.

What do ya do if everything is working? Does the 396 have the flightplan crossfilled from the Trimble, or do you have to enter everything twice?

Are all of the needles pointing to something, or do you have to scramble if one radio quits?

Do you manage your workload in advance, or are you constantly behind the eight-ball when told to change frequencies?

Can you recognize the subtle failures, like a glideslope out of calibration, or an altimeter that is 50' off? Is an altimeter 50’ off a failure?

Is all of the paperwork in order? (My number one problem found in the preflight.) Are the required handbooks that 'must be accessible to the pilot' accessible? Or are they in the baggage compartment? Does the baggage compartment door have the placard? Is the compass card dated, legible, and current?

Is the pilot aware of the NTSB's decision regarding "known ice", which is more restrictive than the FAA's? How about the recommended penalty for conducting flight in known ice (hang 'em high)?

Is the equipment on board working properly or does the pilot make a bunch of excuses for how they cheat the equipment into doing the job, especially the autopilot?

I usually do a ‘9 Lives’ exercise in the sim before flying with a pilot for an IPC, sending them off to an IFR checkride, telling ‘em good luck on their airline interview sim ride, or moving on to the airplane. The ‘9 Lives’ lets me know what needs work. It’s a simple cross country that requires clearance-copying, CFIT avoidance, lost comm procedures, partial panel recognition, unusual attitude recoveries, navigation along airways, navigation equipment failure recognition, three types of approaches including a single-nav non-precision approach, checklist adherence, missed approach procedures, holding patterns both for the missed and in lieu of a procedure turn, alternate airport selection, fuel management, and a whole host of other skills. It’s unrealistic as all of the failures ‘probably’ won’t ever happen to anyone, but even a single one has caused pilots to kill themselves. So, to keep it fun, it’s a game. If you make it through with one life remaining, you win. You lose a life if your pitch exceeds 20 degrees in either direction, if bank angle exceeds 60 degrees, if you spin, hit a mountain, lose control, exceed altitude by more than 2000’ up or 200’ low, run out of fuel, land gear up, go missed at MDA in a non-turbine twin, and a few other things.

After the sim session, we know what needs work. Most of that can be accomplished in the sim if needed. Or, we step into the plane and get to work there. The IFR PTS dictates what a CFII must see in order to sign off an IPC. The pilot’s performance must be up to PTS standards. The PTS gives CFIIs no choice. I must see a circle-to-land approach, and if the airplane is so equipped, a GPS approach and an autopilot-coupled approach. If they show up with an IFR Garmin 480, we’re going to Carlsbad to do a precision GPS approach.

My IPC syllabus is dictated by the pilot and the airplanes they usually fly.

Fly SAFE!
Jedi Nein
 
Last edited:
Thanks Jedi,

If you were close I wouldn't hesitate taking your program, it sounds thorough and difficult. That's what I need, having all this good wx in the midwest rotted my skills and I need them back, I found a guy that flys in everything, all the time. He is a legend in the midwest and has taught me a lot or as much about instrument flying as Kirby did with aerobatics.

Thanks for the ideas and possible gotchas!
 
TDTURBO said:
It's called "anti-Israelism" most Jews in this country have it and are disgusted by the way Sharoan(sp)? is running the country, the leaders over there are ruining their country.

I will not take up offers for an IPC from some punk that has less than 10,000 hrs and most of it must be flying 135 Cargo in a plane without known ice. Or from some ERU grad that never saw a cloud, sorry fellas.

Like I said earlier, I already found the guy with the logbook and grey hairs to get me up tO speed, thanls anyway.

Time in a logbook is no judge of how a man handles an airplane, nor is age. I know a young man who is 16 years old who can fly a Navajo better than most people I know. He has had excellent instruction and the opportunity to fly many different types of aircraft. So while you are off looking for the old grey haired guy who looks like he would be a good teacher, there is a others around you who could give better instruction. What I am saying is don't judge a book by its cover. Actual experience may vary, results not typical, one per customer. Residency restrictions apply, not valid in Maine or Florida, use only as directed, not responsible for lost or misdirected mail, odds of winning depend on the number of entries received,two score and seven years...god dang biatch set me up, I didn't have sex with that woman...
 
TDTURBO said:
I am where I am by learning from others with more experience than I, not from some babbling idiot that claims to be someone he isn't, now do you get it?
TD...
Avbug and I are the same "vintage" and from the same area. Our orbits have crossed a few times in the past. Becareful who you call a "babbling idiot" As far as I can see, his only "offense" is being frank.

Avbug...
I'm trying to put a face to your posts. Spraying right out of high school? Do the words: Rawdon, Tony, toilet paper, or Woodhouse Brothers have any meaning?

'Sled
 
JediNein said:
...go missed at MDA in a non-turbine twin...

...did I miss something here? Aren't you supposed to maintain MDA until the MAP and then go missed even if it's a non-turbine twin?

-mini
 
minitour said:
...did I miss something here? Aren't you supposed to maintain MDA until the MAP and then go missed even if it's a non-turbine twin?

-mini


Hmmmm...I think she meant go missed on one engine in a non-turbine twin.
 
bigD said:
Hmmmm...I think she meant go missed on one engine in a non-turbine twin.

DING!DING! We have a winner!

Sorry 'bout the confusion, I should know better than to post before 10 PM.

Fly SAFE!
Jedi Nein
 
Avbug, Phil, others, please just let this idiot be. And TD, when you and your 1000 hours finally realize what a douchebag you are, come back and see us. And if I have to hear about your F'ing 182 again, I'm gonna puke. Oh wait, it's a "R"182, you're more of a badass than I thought. Tool...
 
freeflyer14 said:
Avbug, Phil, others, please just let this idiot be. And TD, when you and your 1000 hours finally realize what a douchebag you are, come back and see us. And if I have to hear about your F'ing 182 again, I'm gonna puke. Oh wait, it's a "R"182, you're more of a badass than I thought. Tool...

Yeah, a tool making over $300,000+ a year as a doctor, many rental homes, who has his own 182RG that is paid for. Hey man, just for kicks how does it feel to make "peanuts" to fly that shiny new ERJ around and live paycheck to paycheck?. Sorry, just curious... Yeah, TD is leading one miserable life- LOL (I about p!ssed my pants when I read your response, thanks for the laugh)

I think Mr. TD has the last laugh on this one.

$25,000 a year, you daaaaaaaaaaaaaa man:D

TD- you had to get a kick outta that one?. Mommy and Daddy probably still paying for his little one bedroom apt.!
 
350DRIVER said:
Yeah, a tool making over $300,000+ a year as a doctor...

Is he a good doctor or a tool? I've met both. A tool is still a tool regardless of income.

Hey man, just for kicks how does it feel to make "peanuts" to fly that shiny new ERJ around and live paycheck to paycheck?.

Making more than that to instruct in smaller airplanes, I wouldn't know. Although it would be nice to be a little more comfortable. But I'm happy, and there's as many definitions of QOL as there are pilots.

I see your point, 350, I really do. TD has a good career and is probably really good at being a dr., and I'm sure that he has buckets full of life experience which we youngsters have not yet had the chance to accumulate. However, I don't think it's fair to say that income level equates with happiness or non-toolishness, or that income level in some other profession equates with skill and proficiency in flying. The "gotchas" in flying do not discriminate.

-Goose
 
Goose Egg said:
Is he a good doctor or a tool? I've met both. A tool is still a tool regardless of income.



Making more than that to instruct in smaller airplanes, I wouldn't know. Although it would be nice to be a little more comfortable. But I'm happy, and there's as many definitions of QOL as there are pilots.

I see your point, 350, I really do. TD has a good career and is probably really good at being a dr., and I'm sure that he has buckets full of life experience which we youngsters have not yet had the chance to accumulate. However, I don't think it's fair to say that income level equates with happiness or non-toolishness, or that income level in some other profession equates with skill and proficiency in flying. The "gotchas" in flying do not discriminate.

-Goose

Having known him personally for quite some time now I don't buy into the "tool" label, but again view or see him as you wish since very few things if anything seem to effect him personally for the obvious reasons. He is a good, accomplished, successful, and experienced doctor with probably more years in his respective profession than most (not all) have in aviation who have jumped down his throat on this thread and others. I wouldn't think twice about having a family member or friend aboard a flight that he was at the controls of, with as much as he has viewing him as "unsafe" and one to increase risks, take many chances, etc, just does not stick with me when in reality he has everything one could possibly want in life to throw it all away and depart this planet via a smoking hole in the ground.

I don't think it's fair to say that income level equates with happiness or non-toolishness, or that income level in some other profession equates with skill and proficiency in flying. The "gotchas" in flying do not discriminate.

I agree to a certain extent, but I also don't take much to heart from a "kid" who is still in love with the lure of flying a new shiny ERJ around who seems to lack the class, professionalism, and overall life experience to be throwing a label around on someone he hasn't a clue about.

TD is still around and I sure don't think he is going away anytime soon given his previous time(s), he does know his equipment inside and out.

Keep in mind, he is not a pilot by trade. I would trade positions with him in a heartbeat if I could.

Nothing more and nothing less.. Be careful when labeling all "non career" pilots as "unsafe". One of the sharpest pilots I have ever flown with was a CJ captain who owned multiple companies who flew for "fun" on the side who was as sharp as I have seen.

3 5 0
 
FWIW, I've run into "TDTurbo" types before - successful professionals such as doctors, attornies, business men, etc. These guys tend to be motivated, driven types who attack everything they do with a vengence. They work hard and they play hard. They also tend not to listen to other mere mortals.

Put these kind of guys in the cockpit and they often do very well - at the control manipulation part of flying. The problem is you can't tell them anything, they already know it all. As a result you read posts where they talk about how good they are, about flying non-deiced airplanes in freezing rain, experimenting with how much ice an airplane will carry before you get tail stall, etc, etc, etc.

Yep, I've met those types before and several of them (and their passengers) are now dead. They died when their stupid, ill-advised actions finally caught up with them. Aviation is a funny thing, you can do some of the stupidest things and often times nothing is hurt but your pride. You can overload an airplane, fly it out of CG, and do any number of foolish, ill-advised (not to mention illegal) stuff and get a way with it - sometimes for years. Like I said before, if you do so the danger never goes away, it merely lies in wait.

Money and success can get you a lot of things; but it can't get you good old fashioned common sense. Remember back in your initial flight training how they talked about how accidents seem to cluster at certain distinct points – 100 hours, 500 hours, 1000 hours, 3000 hours, 10000 hours, etc. With a little experience there is a real tendency to get too comfortable and let your guard down.

Unfortunately, over the years, I have known many good pilots (and a few of them were MDs) who have died in aircraft accidents. When it happens, it is a VERY sobering experience. All too often, as you look back on the events surrounding the accident it becomes very apparent that, in many cases, it was very avoidable.

There is another interesting phenomenon that pilots fall into. Most guys, when they get 100 hours, think they know a lot about flying. When they have their instrument rating and 500 hours they're practically ready to be an ATP. Once they hit 1000 hours, well that's it, bring on the jet transports, they know it all - or so they think. Funny thing though, talk to pilots with 10,000 to 15,000+ hours in their logs and they'll tell you that they can't believe how much they don't know. Our friend is right at one of those logbook landmarks and we read his posts about how good he is and how he's been "experimenting" in icing conditions.

He fits the mold of several of the dead doctors and dentists I've known. If you need to fly in weather conditions where icing is frequently a consideration then get an airplane that has that capability, then use it wisely. Being at the top of your game won't do a bit of good if the airplane decides it's finished flying for the day.

'Sled
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom