Hey Albie,
God, how I couldn't stand those "McPeak" changes the AF did to the uniform! It was bad enough when they got rid of khakis in the mid-60s! (My Dad was USAAF WWII, and retired USAF in 1973 with 30 years, so he liked the khakis). Ironically, Gen. McPeak and Gen. Fogleman were in the same F-100 outfit in Viet Nam. However, their ideas on running the Air Force were alot different.
The composite wing idea was flawed, because it is a logistical nightmare and very expensive to operate. The Expeditionary air wing is a better idea, but is that still a viable doctrine today? I've been retired from the military and have kind of lost touch on things these days. However, with the proposed withdrawls from Korea and Europe. The Air Force will be facing a major problem in how to deploy and operate it's forces. It would seem that strategic airlift/tanker support and civil engineering (Red Bull/Prime Beef) will be an area that re-capitalization needs to take place. Very challenging era ahead for the next generation of AF leaders/planners.
I have to admit a little bit of bias toward Otis. My Dad was stationed there twice 62-66 and 70-73. I basically grew up on the base and alot of my fondest memories are of waking up to the sound of airplanes at the flightline just a couple of miles away from the housing area. My Dad flew the EC-121, C-54, EB-57 and T-33 at Otis, but I really loved the F-101 and later when the Mass ANG moved down from Logan they flew the F-84, F-100 and F-106 (THE ultimate single-seat fighter ever flown by the USAF IMHO). So, I am a little sad now that Otis is loosing it's flying mission for the USAF, but I guess that the radius of action for the F-15 dictated the move.
Regards,
ex-Navy Rotorhead (USAF brat 60's/70's)