Wild Weasel
Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2005
- Posts
- 17
That reminds me of the earlier BRAC when they needed to get the number of fighter wings in the 1990s down to 13 or so from 26. To the untrained eye, a reduction in fighter wings should mean a reduction of fighters....but wait...why give up the fighter squadrons when you can make "super" wings. Why feel constrained by having only 2 or 3 squadrons in a wing? Lets just keep the same number of fighters and cram them into fewer locations......does Luke AFB come to mind? What do they have now?......9?...10? F-16 squadrons under one wing? I think in the mid 90s Luke was deemed to be the 4th or 5th largest air force in the world!! More fighters there than PACAF and USAFE combined!!
By the way...I'm not complaining.
By the way...I'm not complaining.