Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

BRAC Rumors

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I found this through a web search. Not sure of its validity.

Army bases currently proposed for closure or realignment in 2005
include:

Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania
Detroit Arsenal, Michigan
Fort Belvoir, Virginia
Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico
Fort McPherson/Gillem, Georgia
Fort Monmouth, New Jersey
Fort Monroe, Virginia
Fort Polk, Louisiana (to realign)
Fort Richardson, Alaska
Fort Sam Houston, Texas
Fort Shafter, Hawaii
Lima Army Tank Plant, Ohio
Natick Soldier Center, Massachusetts
Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey
Redstone Arsenal, Alabama
Rock Island Arsenal, Illinois
Sierra Army Depot, California
Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona
=====================================================
Air Force base closures and realignments include:

Altus AFB, Oklahoma
Beale AFB, California
Brooks AFB, Texas
Cannon AFB, New Mexico
Columbus AFB, Mississippi
Ellsworth AFB, South Dakota
Goodfellow AFB, Texas
Grand Forks AFB, North Dakota
Hanscom AFB, Massachusetts
Kirtland AFB, New Mexico
Los Angeles AFB, California
McConnell AFB, Kansas
Nellis AFB, Nevada (to realign)
Seymour Johnson AFB, North Carolina (to realign)
Shaw AFB, South Carolina
Vance AFB, Oklahoma

The Air Force will lose 2,260 military and 2,839 civilian
manpower positions, and 1,055 reserve drill authorizations next year,
according to the 2004 force-structure announcement released July 23.
Many bases, both active duty and reserve component, are affected by the
realignment. In many cases, units will gain aircraft and missions, while
others will pare down.

Besides manpower reductions, the realignment formally announces the
>retirement of the C-9A Nightingale and KC-135E Stratotanker aircraft.

According to Air Force officials, the 20 C-9s are being retired
because of reduced-patient movement, range limitations and increasing
maintenance and upgrade costs. The aeromedical-evacuation mission will
become a requirements-based system using all passenger-capable aircraft.

The service will retire 44 of the Air National Guard and Air
Force Reserve Command's 43-year-old KC-135Es next year, replacing them
with 24 KC-135Rs from the active-duty fleet. By the end of fiscal 2006,
the Air Force will have retired 68 of the KC-135Es.
============================================================================

Naval base closures and realignments include:

Ingleside Naval Station, Texas
Naval Postgraduate School, California
Naval Air Station Meridian, Mississippi
Naval Air Engineering Station Lakehurst, New Jersey
Naval Recreation Station Solomons Island,
Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane, Indiana
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division, Virginia
Navy Supply Corps School, Georgia
New Orleans Naval Support Activity, Louisiana
Pascagoula Naval Station, Mississippi
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, New Hampshire
Saratoga Springs Naval Support Unit, New York
========================================================================

Marine base closures and realignments include:

Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany, Georgia
Marine Corps Logistics Base Barstow, California (realignment)
Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, California
Marine Corps Mountain Warfare School, Califirnia
Marine Reserve Support Unit, Kansas City
Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego, California (realign or close)
 
There's LOTS of talk about Beale closing around Marysville, CA. Hearing rumors the U2 could move to Offutt AFB in Nebraska.

By the way, I'm sure it is a fake as the "Official" list should be very closely held.
 
FYI,

1030ET 13 May will be the time for the DOD press conference with the release of BRAC list on the USAF website. This is according to the official BRAC website.

Peace, out

CLAMBAKE
 
There is no way they would close down 2 UPT bases. To be honest, I'd like to see them try and close just one. There is no way they could combine UPT bases and keep the same number of pilots graduating each year. That place would need at least 6 runways, 4 of which allowing overhead patterns (yea right), not to mention double the mx facilities and other logistical aspects. My prediction - fake or at least incorrect list.

Stupid BRAC.
 
Purduepete said:
There is no way they would close down 2 UPT bases.
Relax Pete, Columbus and Vance are on every BRAC proposal list that comes out. In fact, most of those bases are the same ones that are always on the proposed list. The proposed list gets floated up and then the politics begin. This oughta be an interesting round, though.
 
Time will tell. I am interested to see what will happen. With the bases that close down, They will have to move the junk and personell around to different bases. It will be interesting to see how the bases that stay up change to conform to this new way of basing(sp, if that is even a word, haha)or supplying or storing this equip.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top