Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Big meeting: Skywest, ASA/XJet, Alpa, SAPA

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
As long as the Atkin family maintains complete control of the company, its all just a pipe dream. SkyWest Airlines is their baby and they will not allow you to taint what they've spent 40 years creating.
 
As long as the Atkin family maintains complete control of the company, its all just a pipe dream. SkyWest Airlines is their baby and they will not allow you to taint what they've spent 40 years creating.

Exactly what he said. It's all just a pipe dream.
 
It has nothing to do with family. It's all about business and the bottom line. The second that the BOD feel that it's good business, they will do it regardless of anyone's relation. Doesn't make it right and it doesn't mean we cannot influence that decision, it just makes it what it is.
 
It has nothing to do with family. It's all about business and the bottom line. The second that the BOD feel that it's good business, they will do it regardless of anyone's relation. Doesn't make it right and it doesn't mean we cannot influence that decision, it just makes it what it is.


Who do you think is Chairman of the Board? Jerry Atkin

Who owns the controlling interest of company stock? The Atkin Family

Good luck, Nevets.
 
As long as the Atkin family maintains complete control of the company, its all just a pipe dream. SkyWest Airlines is their baby and they will not allow you to taint what they've spent 40 years creating.

Not that I disagree with you, Xpoo, but if you glimpse into the not too distant future you can see there will be quite a big challenge for Inc. Why is the Inc Board talking to all the groups? Why are they changing their MOP now? Because in about 3 years the hiring wave at the legacy Carriers will hit its full stride and there's very few coming up through the flight schools... Think about it for a second... Delta alone is gonna need in the neighborhood of 7000 pilots in the next 10 years AND THATS 1 Airline...... Throw in Unical, American, USAir, Southwest and that number gets unfathomable... Brad Holt and Charlie Tutt have already admitted they don't know exactly what they're gonna do. Its becoming harmful to Inc. when XJET hires a pilot that SkyWest can no longer
And vice versa. You can slow attrition slightly by allowing people to live where they want to, and give new hires the whole country to be based out of.

Inc isnt going to have a baby if they don't adapt. I believe they will and part of that process will be integrating the pilot group as a whole.
 
You wouldn't like my answer, but suffice to say the SKW side will be just fine. XJT/ASQ? Draw your own conclusion. I'll let you know when they start breaking ground on a third building here at HDQ, but until then its all smoke and mirrors.
 
You wouldn't like my answer, but suffice to say the SKW side will be just fine. XJT/ASQ? Draw your own conclusion. I'll let you know when they start breaking ground on a third building here at HDQ, but until then its all smoke and mirrors.

So you eliminate the ASQ side and somehow shrink to profitability on the SkyWest side? There arent enough pilots on the regional side, they're headed upwards. ASQ is in Delta's backyard, i guess SkyWest would give that up as well? Or would they just take over? And then with what pilots?
 
Well, SKW is already profitable. Maybe it goes something like this: Inc operates some 500 50-seat or less regional jets and turboprobs. As those aircraft are retired, I dont see Inc replacing those 1-for-1 with 70-90 seat regional jets. Maybe more like a 2- or 3-for-1 swap. SkyWest mabe shrinks from 754 aircraft to 500. There's one way to eliminate your need for more pilots. But during this process SKW grows while ASQ shrinks. Just a theory.
 
Well, SKW is already profitable. Maybe it goes something like this: Inc operates some 500 50-seat or less regional jets and turboprobs. As those aircraft are retired, I dont see Inc replacing those 1-for-1 with 70-90 seat regional jets. Maybe more like a 2- or 3-for-1 swap. SkyWest mabe shrinks from 754 aircraft to 500. There's one way to eliminate your need for more pilots. But during this process SKW grows while ASQ shrinks. Just a theory.

I'm not taking this discussion as an attack Xpoo, just curious how you're thinking. I do believe XJET was purchased for its pilots as the e145's will be eliminated. Last earnings call XJT was profitable as well, brought in close to 20 million in revenue while SkyWest brought in around 10 million. Overall, Brad Rich stated Inc is very pleased with the "cost synergies" xjet is now gaining. I think you'll agree that profit margins on both the SkyWest side and Xjet side are razor thin... Inc purchased Xjet and combined it with ASA trying to get those margins up... They're still thin and investors arent biting.... By eliminating ASQ you are eliminating the "padding" effect of those margins. Investors would bail FAST. Right now Inc has economies of scale on its side... I believe they will grow that. I dont believe they will combine the Companies, only the groups like a Republic for instance.
 
I dont believe they will combine the Companies, only the groups like a Republic for instance.

Even if they don't combine the companies, there will still be the large hurdle of seniority integration across the remaining departments. I don't know who all is unionized at XJET, but you can certainly bet that the non-union employees equivilants at SKW won't cave in and say, "Okay, we accept your staple, despite the fact that we earned to money to buy you."
 
Even if they don't combine the companies, there will still be the large hurdle of seniority integration across the remaining departments.

It's still a moot point until HDQ adds more office space. The place is pretty much operating at capacity as it is now.
 
Even if they don't combine the companies, there will still be the large hurdle of seniority integration across the remaining departments. I don't know who all is unionized at XJET, but you can certainly bet that the non-union employees equivilants at SKW won't cave in and say, "Okay, we accept your staple, despite the fact that we earned to money to buy you."

While there are a ton of logistics to work out, there will be no staple (allegheny/mohawk).... Delta and Unical will start hiring soon... If XJET can't staff its side, who's bottom line does that ultimately affect? Same goes with SkyWest, if cancellations due to lack of crew on either side happen, it all affects the bottom line the same...

I believe last tues-thurs is the beginning to "working out those logistics."
 
I don't know who all is unionized at XJET, but you can certainly bet that the non-union employees equivilants at SKW won't cave in and say, "Okay, we accept your staple, despite the fact that we earned to money to buy you."

For ANYBODY to think that stapling a employees is STILL and option, I feel sorry for them. At least, if the employee group DOESN'T want to be stapled anyway.

Ever heard of the McCaskil bond? Pretty sure it applies to non unionized as well.
 
For ANYBODY to think that stapling a employees is STILL and option, I feel sorry for them. At least, if the employee group DOESN'T want to be stapled anyway.

Ever heard of the McCaskil bond? Pretty sure it applies to non unionized as well.

If your non union then your at will employment.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top