N905TW
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2004
- Posts
- 50
All this accomplished is 'guarantee' that there will NOT be an integration of the two carriers; as the combined list means Nothing unless the two carriers are combined. With 3000+ strong, the US Air (east) pilots have NO reason to agree to a 'joint contract' unless there is A Lot of money in it for them.
While this is a wonderful "theory" of what could happen, I really am skeptical that the US East group would rather work under LOA 93. I commute to PHX, and was on East metal in the jumpseat a few months ago. The CLT based crew was very open and honest, and wanted me to talk openly and honestly, not just spout off the answers they wanted to hear just because I was in their jumpseat. And that's exactly what we did for 4 hours. We discussed the combined seniority list, and while all 3 of us had differing ideas and thoughts, one thing we ALL agreed on was that whatever the arbitrator ruled, it would be final and we would move on.
That discussion however, took up only 1/10th of our flight time. What the crew really wanted to talk about was the need for a new combined contract. All I heard for 3 hours was how bad things were under LOA 93, and they both had more than enough examples about how bad quality of life is on that side. This was just around the time that we were threatening to pull out of Joint talks and continue along with our own section 6. They were scared to death that they would possibly have to work under their concessionary contract for any longer than necessary. In the Captain's own words: "we are beat down as far as we can go".
Assuming that any new TA for a Joint Contract has improvements to the AWA book, are you seriously thinking that a majority of the active East pilots would vote down a proposal that included a rather large boost in pay, more vacation and sick time, better scheduling rules, West pref bid, better rest rules, improved reserve system, restored crew meals, etc? And for what reason?
This list was constructed on the basis of what each group brought to the table on merger day. If you were in the bottom 15%, guess what, you are still in the bottom 15%. I understand why some people are going ballistic by seeing someone with 15 years East seniority just 1 number senior to someone with 1 year West seniority, but the fact of the matter is that we are not responsible for USAir's problems for the past 20 years. The fact that 15 years East seniority only bought you domestic 737 F/O RSV in PHL is not my problem.
How does a furloughed employee think they have any right to displace or jump ahead of someone who was actually WORKING when this merger occurred? I am furloughed TWA, and if AA bought Continental tomorrow, for example, I would expect nothing more than to be placed at the bottom of the new list. I am not working, so therefore I have no expectation of being placed in front of 1 or 2 or 3 year CO new hires. They are working and active, I am furloughed and bring nothing to the party.
The focus going forward needs to be on securing the best Joint Contract that we can, not crying over an arbitration that worked exactly as it was supposed to. East had the opportunity to negotiate on this for the past 2 years, but decided to try and stick it to the West. That failed, and its now time to move on.