Lonestar
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2002
- Posts
- 237
From our swa prune forum.(Thanks to the AirTran guys who send this stuff to their SWA buddies!)
So if I understand this correctly,
The ATN Merger Committee negotiated a deal with SWAPA, then their lawyers slapped them upside the head for what they agreed to.
And this is just the process that dictates how and when to negotiate. This isn't even the real negotiations!
Fear not AirTran bubbas, just believe what Lear 70 says:
Oops....
March 9, 2011
On Thursday, March 3, the ATN MEC Merger Committee and the SWAPA Negotiating Committee jointly announced that we had reached consensus on a Process Agreement, which will govern the protocol and timeline used to attain an integrated seniority list (ISL). As mentioned in that announcement, it was clearly understood that prior to final agreement, the document would be subject to review and approval by our respective legal and management teams.
As part of that review process, both our outside and ALPA counsel have expressed concern over portions of language formulated during the final session of talks on Thursday. We believe these concerns should be addressed, and we look forward to working further with our counterparts at SWAPA to draft language with which all Parties will be satisfied.
In Service,
Your ATN Merger Committee
So if I understand this correctly,
The ATN Merger Committee negotiated a deal with SWAPA, then their lawyers slapped them upside the head for what they agreed to.
And this is just the process that dictates how and when to negotiate. This isn't even the real negotiations!
Fear not AirTran bubbas, just believe what Lear 70 says:
Nah, there's a BUNCH of people that took a collective sigh of relief when that letter was signed and the Process Agreement was T.A.'d.
I also see no reason for SWA management nor AAI management NOT to sign the Process Agreement (and SWAPA and AAI ALPA already did).
Oops....