Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

"ATC explain yourself, over"

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Hold West said:
I'm praying for that day to come as much as you are. In fact, I can't wait until I can just lean back when there's about six of you all diving for the end of the runway at the same time, and just say, good luck! Then watch the s-turns, 360s and go arounds.

Hold,

You seem like a pretty good guy, but you flatter yourself that efficient arrival operations could not be conducted with far less intrusion by Air Traffic Coordinators. In the USAF it was not uncommon to have 14 T-38's flown by STUDENT pilots (all doing 300 kts) in the overhead and extended pattern to the same runway simultaneously ... and all being minimally "de-conflicted" by another (gasp!) pilot ... not an ATC "specialist". :eek:

You do realize there are many aircraft operating across oceans and in various parts of the world that DO NOT communicate with ANYONE (including the tanker(s) they're rendezvousing with)... let alone an FAA certified ATC specialist and yet they successfully complete their missions "quietly" every day.

As I mentioned in my previous post, someone (a UPS pilot ... gasp! :eek: ) began to think ever so slightly "out of the box" and came up with a continuous idle VNAV/LNAV arrival into SDF from cruise altitude to the FAF. Bottom line, more aircraft arrive within a shorter time frame, burn less fuel, and produce less noise than previous ATC "specialist" directed speed up, slow down, extended 30 mi. finals.

I agree with you that I can't wait for the day you all are significantly removed from the coordination picture! Psst, it's called "free flight" (thanks to ADS-B) and it's coming. Perhaps you've read about it? :D

Hold, you seem like one of the good guys in ATC so my rant is not aimed at you personally. Just as UAV/UCAV is shaping modern warfare, so too will computers and high-speed datalink re-shape the rules and procedures we clumsily follow in the skies today. (Like it or not, BOTH of our hands-on duties are going to be substantially diminished in the future.)

BBB
 
The main time I've seen guys on approach (here at SWA) ask is when we are close/high to the airport. We want to know if ATC has a reason to have us at 8000 feet as we pass overhead the runway going the wrong way, maybe because there is a bunch of traffic in front of us. Whereas if we are overhead at 8000 and are number one, we can start throwing down the gear and plan ourselves a visual to the runway.

It is called situational awareness and when either pilots or controllers play "I have a secret" we all end up with less of a picture than we want. (see thread about declaring an emergency. Controllers probably would prefer us to declare an emergency if we want emergency handling. Well, pilots want to be able to plan min fuel/min time approaches and we can't do that if we are kept in the dark about our sequence)
 
Hold West said:
What is meaningful is for me to tell you what to expect

Maybe "what's my sequence" is pilot shorthand for "tell me what to expect." On the very rare occasions I use it, that's the information I'm looking for.

I may see a lot of airplanes out in front of me, see them on the TCAS and hear them on the radio. All this information contributes to my SA and leads me to form expectations as to when and where to start configuring my aircraft. What I need to know is if those expectations coincide with the controllers. On the one hand I am trying to save fuel and give the PAX a smooth ride. OTOH, I am trying to be prepared, speed and configuration-wise, in case I get "slam dunked." It happens much more often than it should and can scare the PAX and raise the risk factor when it happens.

if it's out of the ordinary.

Controllers work the same airspace, airport(s) and procedures every day, day after day. Pilots, OTOH, work different airports and procedures all over the country and sometimes, all over the world. What's ordinary to you is rarely ordinary to us.
 
Big Beer Belly said:
I agree with you that I can't wait for the day you all are significantly removed from the coordination picture! Psst, it's called "free flight" (thanks to ADS-B) and it's coming. Perhaps you've read about it? :D


BBB

"Free flight". Yeah, I've read about it. Beginning at least 15 years ago. They said "it's coming". I'm still waiting. And I bet I'll be waiting long after I've left this business.
 
Since we're on a similar topic....some folks seem to feel that they should always be able to depart #1, climb straight to cruise altitude, fly their exact routing at normal speed, descend and land #1 without any sort of delay. It seems that they feel as though it is the ATCer's job to make sure that their flight turns out as I described above. I have flown with these types before, and their constant b!tching about delays gets on my nerves a hell of a lot more than the delays themselves. If you're one of these that gets all pissy because there are 12 airplanes in front of you to land at a major airport, calm the hell down already. It gets old. Okay, vent over.

As for the topic, one may ask for the sequence just for planning and situational awareness purposes. I have asked that myself in the past.
 
Last edited:
A controlled experiment involving one company flying mostly into their hubs is one thing, when you try to include every airline and commercial operators, that will be something else.
 
Big Beer Belly said:
You seem like a pretty good guy, but you flatter yourself that efficient arrival operations could not be conducted with far less intrusion by Air Traffic Coordinators. In the USAF it was not uncommon to have 14 T-38's flown by STUDENT pilots (all doing 300 kts) in the overhead and extended pattern to the same runway simultaneously ... and all being minimally "de-conflicted" by another (gasp!) pilot ... not an ATC "specialist". :eek:

You do realize there are many aircraft operating across oceans and in various parts of the world that DO NOT communicate with ANYONE (including the tanker(s) they're rendezvousing with)... let alone an FAA certified ATC specialist and yet they successfully complete their missions "quietly" every day.

As I mentioned in my previous post, someone (a UPS pilot ... gasp! :eek: ) began to think ever so slightly "out of the box" and came up with a continuous idle VNAV/LNAV arrival into SDF from cruise altitude to the FAF. Bottom line, more aircraft arrive within a shorter time frame, burn less fuel, and produce less noise than previous ATC "specialist" directed speed up, slow down, extended 30 mi. finals.

Beer Belly,

You need to get out of the military and into the much larger world of civilian flying - well, when you "flight control manipulation technicians" and "meat autopilots" are RIFed and replaced by UAVs, you'll find out (see I can denigrate your role, too). Or when the AF buys Airbus tankers that override your inputs when you're f-ing up. <------just kidding, folks. Well, kinda.

Each situation you described above involves similar type aircraft, all flying for the same company, all flying carefully choreographed procedures where everyone knows their role and everyone plays the game. All your students queuing up to land in their T-38s work just fine, because if they f-up and cut each other off, they will mess up their chances of passing the program big time. Ever been on an aircraft carrier? I have. Things work there as well as they do because everyone plays the game to the same rules to a very tight standard. UPS can do their thing because they are vampires - they hub in the middle of the night with no other traffic to contend with.

Out in the larger world, it does not work that way. Go down and read the "regionals" topic. They're all out to cut each other's throat. You think they're going to play nice? "No, Mesa, you go ahead and land, I'll wait out here". Baloney! And the thing is, I've seen it. My favorite was the DC-9 driver who knew, just knew he could beat the ATR-42 I told him he would be following. He canceled IFR, aimed at the numbers, and dived for it. And arrived on a three mile right base with a 120 knot overtake on the ATR-42, which was on a two mile final. Sorry, you lose. Crank it back out and fly a downwind for a while. And that was only two airplanes. Let's throw a Cherokee, a Baron with a busted transponder and a P-3 that wants multiple ILSes into mix. And, oh, there's a Lifeguard Kingair and couple of 737s. It'd sound like a Prisoner rerun if you left them to their own devices:

"I am Number 2."
"Who is number 1?"
"You are Number 6."

Try this one: uncontrolled airport near the Canadian border. Aircraft calls for IFR clearance, gets it. #2 calls, told to standby until #1 departs. #2 says, "Hey, we're at the runway, he's behind us, we are #1". Controller says have him come up on frequency so I can cancel his release. A few minutes pass, and #3 calls for clearance. Controller says stand by, waiting on the first two to call back. #3 says "I think it will be a while, they are out of the aircraft fist fighting on the taxiway". True story. I've got lots more.

So while your ideal world would be nice, it ain't gonna happen. Not in your lifetime, not in mine. So we'd better all get along, because it is the way it's going to be for a while.
 
firstthird said:
The main time I've seen guys on approach (here at SWA) ask is when we are close/high to the airport. We want to know if ATC has a reason to have us at 8000 feet as we pass overhead the runway going the wrong way, maybe because there is a bunch of traffic in front of us. Whereas if we are overhead at 8000 and are number one, we can start throwing down the gear and plan ourselves a visual to the runway.

It is called situational awareness and when either pilots or controllers play "I have a secret" we all end up with less of a picture than we want. (see thread about declaring an emergency. Controllers probably would prefer us to declare an emergency if we want emergency handling. Well, pilots want to be able to plan min fuel/min time approaches and we can't do that if we are kept in the dark about our sequence)

This happens to me often flying into MIA from the east and landing east. Sometimes the controller is just going to slam you in and sometimes they are sequencing you. If the radios aren't cluttered, what's the problem with asking? It paints the picture better and also asks what can we expect.
 
Hold West said:
Beer Belly,

You need to get out of the military and into the much larger world of civilian flying - well, when you "flight control manipulation technicians" and "meat autopilots" are RIFed and replaced by UAVs, you'll find out (see I can denigrate your role, too). Or when the AF buys Airbus tankers that override your inputs when you're f-ing up. <------just kidding, folks. Well, kinda.

[/QUOTE

Hey boy wonder behind the scope... how many years have you put in serving your country? Oh never mind ... you wouldn't have a clue what our fine young military men/women do every day in the service of this great country. Hint: it involves a hell of a lot more RISK than falling off your ATC stool!

BBB
 
Hold West said:
What I am saying, and listen up, is that it is my job to tell you what to expect in a meaningful fashion to allow you to make your plan. Just "You're number 7" does not accomplish that, and contains no useful information. What is useful, and this is what I get from jumpseat rides long ago, is information like "expect a turn on the localizer at about 12 miles, you'll be following a Caravan". Do you care about the 2 737s and the Dash 8 landing ahead of the Caravan? I'll bet you are more interested in how many flying miles you can plan on to the airport...

Maybe I'm the only one but I think he's right...I could care less how many airplanes are on the LOC in front of me but if I know that I'll get turned on at 12 miles out then I have all the info I need. Who cares if there are 2 or 4 airplanes in front of you? 12 miles out is 12 miles out.
 
j41driver said:
Maybe I'm the only one but I think he's right...I could care less how many airplanes are on the LOC in front of me but if I know that I'll get turned on at 12 miles out then I have all the info I need. Who cares if there are 2 or 4 airplanes in front of you? 12 miles out is 12 miles out.


j41,

Problem is "Hold" is full of crap. In 20+ years of flying military/121 NEVER have I been told how many miles I can expect to be turned to a base. His is purely an "academic" answer ... truth is it NEVER happens in the real world. Thus, you have numerous guys ALL contradicting him and expressing the same thought. I'd rather be told more information in order to plan an efficient descent/arrival than kept in the dark (which is standard operating procedure for most primadonna ATC "specialists".) These guys coordinate traffic ... nothing more.

We need Reagan to slap the big egos down again! :smash:

BBB
 
Big Beer Belly said:
j41,
We need Reagan to slap the big egos down again! :smash:

BBB

If only we had a leader right now.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom