Like I said, you better get your act together... If this is such a well-established policy and "El-Chup" is incorrect why can't you post it in writing ??? Who's right, who's wrong. Come on guys, you're unified now or aren't you... ??? ...
The Home Front Briefing the update/clarification appeared in was from May 11th.
You may find the thread entitled "Changed Definition..." on page 5 of the (NJ Pilots') message board enlightening. It begins by quoting that section of the May 11th Home Briefing that is relevant to the subject at hand. Take special notice of the posts by a member of the MEC.
Did I read it right that NJ has had as high as a 35% rate of sell off trips? Does that mean that the owner can expect a 1 in 3 chance of not flying a QS airplane already? You guys should be banging on the door af your management to knock that down quick. We have frequent calls from NJ and flying those trips SUCKS! Not to mention that we usually have empty pre and post repositioning flights that can double the billable hours on the airplane. We are ripping you guys off, you should get that stopped.
And H25B is right to call you out for a stance in this issue. Your union speaks for you. What do you say as a group? I could give a s*** what the IBT or whatnot says. What do you guys (pilots, not spouses) think of the scab issue?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.