Andy Neill
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 2,293
Trying to remember elements of my business law.
I was thinking about the agreement between Delta and SkyWest when the latter bought ASA. There was a provision in the contract that said ASA would retain a certain percentage of the flying out of ATL.
Now if Delta breached that contract by awarding SkyWest Inc. ATL flying and requesting/requiring (allowing Inc to let) SkyWest Airlines to fly it, it would be up to SkyWest Inc to ask for redress. If Inc did not object, then it would not be an issue.
I think some have expressed a concern that the ASA flying was dropping below the agreed percentage. I can see where it might be and that Inc doesn't object - in fact would be supportive of SKYW getting more of it. There is no injured party in the contract who has legal standing.
Am I missing something?
I was thinking about the agreement between Delta and SkyWest when the latter bought ASA. There was a provision in the contract that said ASA would retain a certain percentage of the flying out of ATL.
Now if Delta breached that contract by awarding SkyWest Inc. ATL flying and requesting/requiring (allowing Inc to let) SkyWest Airlines to fly it, it would be up to SkyWest Inc to ask for redress. If Inc did not object, then it would not be an issue.
I think some have expressed a concern that the ASA flying was dropping below the agreed percentage. I can see where it might be and that Inc doesn't object - in fact would be supportive of SKYW getting more of it. There is no injured party in the contract who has legal standing.
Am I missing something?