Why not make growth or new flying a stipulation of PBS? Set up the TA, then set up the software to practice like the mec said, the company bids on new flying with the cost savings in it, then if we win the flying we flip the switch to pbs. Everyone benefits, including our furloughed brothers. The way it is now if we don't get the flying only the company benefits. Now what is the argument with that?
Max,
I don't understand this bone you have to pick with PBS. If it is done right, we all benefit from it now. I don't see where this "soft pay" is being lost. You've gained on vacation, if you can afford to stretch it further, there are guys who want the extra work and will likely make up the additional trip you gone. Vacation really is not going to be an issue on this. If anything, we have achieved more credit for vacation than we had before. I have hard time buying into your idea although at least you are offering solutions. If I were a company head, I'd be remiss to pick a company that promised rates based on a trigger with something as important as how schedules are put together. That is the back bone of the airlines operating efficiently *sic*.
So far as the extra "soft pay", if and when we start to see higher net margins, think about what sort of Perf Plus check you've been seeing with 2% versus a 8-9% pay out. On top of that, the expectation is to average one additional day off a month.