79%N1
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2002
- Posts
- 2,441
There is the rub. While I agree with that theory, if LiarBreque and SKW wanted this contract done ASAP, they would say.....'look, here is what we can afford to keep our DCI contract, continue to grow and profit'. Payrates are the smallest issue at ASA, taking a hugh backseat to QOL. If they were really serious, they would have addressed those issues in their proposal. THEY DID NOT!!!!! In fact, many QOL issues were concessionary too! This is UNACCEPTABLE!!!! If we are being asked to give $$$ back to improve their viability or profitability, then they should BEND OVER BACKWARDS to give us things that certainly cost nothing to improve our QOL! This is why I am insulted. I realize that we can no longer say 'ASA is profitable, or made record profits", because we dont know what Delta is now willing to pay for our services. Like I said before, ACA and AirWisc went down this road, and it was ugly. Maybe Delta has contracted to pay SKW so little that there really is almost no profit margin. Who knows? But dont cme to me with no improvements in QOL. WHY CAN I STILL NOT SWAP TRIPS THAT I WANT THAT ARE DENIED FOR NO REALISTIC REASON?!?!?!? WHY IS THERE NO SENIORITY BASED RESERVE OR JUNIOR MANNING IN PLACE? Why do we still have integration, no back-side of the clock flying protection, why are there 3 day trips THAT PAY ME 3 HOURS!!!!!! etc.....
Offer fixes to these problems, then MAYBE we can talk about realistic payrates. However, ANY AND ALL pay concessions (I am on the 700) will only be considered by me if there is profit sharing and/or some sort of snap back for future profitability. I will not finance management bonuses and bottom line.
Offer fixes to these problems, then MAYBE we can talk about realistic payrates. However, ANY AND ALL pay concessions (I am on the 700) will only be considered by me if there is profit sharing and/or some sort of snap back for future profitability. I will not finance management bonuses and bottom line.