sweptback
Guess that wasn't solid
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
- Posts
- 1,876
Yep you should get about 19 or so more. I am guessing on another 2 for 1.
From whom?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep you should get about 19 or so more. I am guessing on another 2 for 1.
Your MEC chair, Dave is one of the best guys you have there. He made a choice to stay there to make it a better place. He was and is not stuck, it is a choice!
He knows the DCI contract that ASA signed, and knows the numbers. ALPA national is looking at the data too.
Here is link to the contract. (trade secret areas have been blanked out)
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/793733/000110465905043902/a05-16042_1ex1d2.htm
Okay I don't vol my time for our union but I totally disagree with you on him and the others.
He didn't. He actually failed the NWA interview when he started spouting off about how morally wrong he thought Compass was during the "Do you have any questions for us?" portion.
He's bitter. He's an ex rep. He's a Midwesterner. You know who he is... just think about it.
Not known as the most levelheaded of people even on his best days.
50's are going away either way. I know that there was a graduated layering of the contract. Just not sure when it started. Either way I am sure the initial agreement has been amended.
How about a 2 for lick my nads!
ASA had better not accept another one of these deals. Another one of these will lead to major furloughs and downgrades. We already will need to eliminate nearly 100 more FO positions (at 5 per pland times 20 planes) if we find no flying for the 20 when they are due to leave next summer.
Add in another 10 900's at a loss of 20 more 200's......we would need to shed 200 FO's and downgrade 100+ Captains! No thanks!
You have to get costs there one way or another. If you are so smart you would have read the contract that DAL and ASA agreed to three years ago.
If you do not get the costs in to the bottom two, DAL has the right to impose those costs on you, you can accept that, or they take your flying.
Read some of the posts on it. It sucks but that is what your former management and SKW's Jerry Atkin agreed to when they bought ASA.
Are you actually suggesting regional pilots to take concessions? Do you remember what we make?
If I ever take concessions from the sh** pay I already make, I will leave this "job." I didn't go into flying for the money, but I also didn't take it to make a penny less than what I make now. Fact is us FO's will be here on the right seat a long time with age 65 and no one else moving on. Less than $30-35K as highly trained professional to fly transport aircraft? There are a million other ways to cut costs than impose concessions on the pilot group.
You can go f*** yourself.
How about a 2 for lick my nads!
ASA had better not accept another one of these deals. Another one of these will lead to major furloughs and downgrades. We already will need to eliminate nearly 100 more FO positions (at 5 per pland times 20 planes) if we find no flying for the 20 when they are due to leave next summer.
Add in another 10 900's at a loss of 20 more 200's......we would need to shed 200 FO's and downgrade 100+ Captains! No thanks!
My guess is if they were to force concessions, the place would get torn down. Not worth the cost.
Instead of "burning the place down," just leave. That way you don't have to work at the crappy company that pissed in your cornflakes, and the rest of us get to keep our jobs.
P.S.-Skywest already flushed most of the riff-raff out of the G.O. (they flushed three times, just for good measure.) They actually do a far better job of running things than any of the previous guys (DALupper mgmt.) did, so there ain't a lot to cut other than our pay-and that will be next-oughta save enough to buy lots of shiny new red triangles for all the really important pilots....
Last time I counted, losing 20 aircraft and getting 10 back was a net loss of 10. Rather large difference, but a loss none the less.
They are going away in any case. Might as well get some 900s in exchange.
They are going away in any case. Might as well get some 900s in exchange.
i talked to several alpa guys who said no concessions were even discussed. where do you get all the doom and gloom from? things are tough now, i imagine that our q1 results arent good. isnt it a good thing that they are meeting. i dont see concessions even being asked for, more likely they will try other options well before pay to save dough. thank god we pilots are so well educated on perfect managment techniques. just shut up and fly.
You are right....but, everybody forgets, we are currently staffed for the 10 900's, but still have all of the 20 200's in our fleet. So, when they leave it will feel like a loss of 20 more aircraft at that time. It's not like we are hiring for these 10 900's. In fact, even with these 900's coming on property, we are still fat on pilots. So, in theory, next summer when they take out the 20 200's from our fleet, we will then be 100 FO's over staffed at that time. Again, that is only if nothing else changes....
They won't even open up a station after hours to handle a diversion if it's not one ot their flights! This is causing a real headache with our dispatchers when flight planning.
Let them take some from Pinnacle, Chatauqua and Freedom and anyone else.