Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

APAAD Founders

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
My delivery is a bit stand off-ish..... My intent is to motivate and get pilots to protect ther careers and particapte in the process. That is win win for all of us...

I guess I am not ready to beg and plead that a professional pilot take responsibility for his/her own career.

Nonetheless, all of our success is dependant on all of us pulling togther... not fighting, not sueing the Association.... no one gives a Sh#t about us... not even us....


Your delivery, Rez, makes you look like an ass to most of the readers here. You succeed in motivating pilots, but not the direction you think: You've motivated many to understand that ALPA is NOT representing its members. I shouldn't have to lobby Washington to protect myself from my fellow "brothers." I shouldn't have to lobby to keep the minority from riding high for five years on the backs of those hired after them. That's not what a union is supposed to be about.

And, there is the crux: as a union, ALPA has failed miserably, and none of your efforts to place the blame on the dues-paying members change this fact. In your world, ALPA would need three gymnasiums to hold an LEC meeting, because every freekin' line pilot would be there. Airlines would suspend ops for the day. Get real....

Our success depends on us not fighting? Really? Your "delivery," as you call it, indicates you like a good fight. Perhaps you should heed the advice I see you get so often (STFU), and take a few days to ponder what your true motivations are. Perhaps you'd be more successful with a different style of "delivery."

BC


P.S. I've often thought you were a management troll. You have the effect of dividing pilots.
 
Your delivery, Rez, makes you look like an ass to most of the readers here.
That's simply because he's not telling you what you want to hear. You'd like him to pat you on the back and tell you that "it's ok that you're not involved in your career, we'll take care of everything for you if you just tell us what to do." Sorry, it doesn't work that way. The membership needs to get off their collective ass and take ownership of their careers and their union. The lack of interest on the part of the membership is appalling.
 
Pilots love to sit back and let somone else handle it. I may not be the biggest fan of ALPA right now but its still an organized labor union which needs to be backed. If we dont like the organization lets change it. I think that in the last several years ALPA has not flexed its muscle enough nor do I think that it represents the pilot group in the way it should. Ex. TSA issues, forgoing the majority who is anti-65, retirements, reasonable rest requirements, bringing more light to bad management etc. All these things could have been done with a little more passion. It is however our fault for not taking matters into our own hands. Like taking the time to figure out who you elect. Volunteering even a little bit of time to our unions. APA is a great organization. What are they doing different? We should find out and do the same. Its time to get a little more militant, informed and involved. ALPA, SWAPA, APA, NPA, etc. All of us.
 
Your delivery, Rez, makes you look like an ass to most of the readers here. You succeed in motivating pilots, but not the direction you think: You've motivated many to understand that ALPA is NOT representing its members.

ok...what is the solution?


I shouldn't have to lobby Washington to protect myself from my fellow "brothers." I shouldn't have to lobby to keep the minority from riding high for five years on the backs of those hired after them. That's not what a union is supposed to be about.

No its called democracy and political effectiveness...

As an American should I NOT have to lobby my fellow Americans to get the gay marriage, gun control, abortion laws that I want??? Why should I have to fight my fellow Americans...

DO you get it?????


And, there is the crux: as a union, ALPA has failed miserably, and none of your efforts to place the blame on the dues-paying members change this fact.

America is a union.

See you just don't want to think about it. You want maintenence free, all for me, service from ALPA.

What responsibilities does an ALPA member have? Direct answer requested!!


In your world, ALPA would need three gymnasiums to hold an LEC meeting, because every freekin' line pilot would be there. Airlines would suspend ops for the day. Get real....

In my world..I'd settle for 10% of an LEC. Right now its less than 5%. And the membership is quite unhappy. A connection?

I'll ask again.. what responsibilites does an ALPA member have? A member of a democracy...

Our success depends on us not fighting? Really? Your "delivery," as you call it, indicates you like a good fight. Perhaps you should heed the advice I see you get so often (STFU), and take a few days to ponder what your true motivations are. Perhaps you'd be more successful with a different style of "delivery."

Stay focued on your career... are you happy with it?

BC


P.S. I've often thought you were a management troll. You have the effect of dividing pilots.

Why because I suggest you take responsbility and self govern your career? Does that make you angry? Does that bother you that I suggest that you actually do that?
 
My delivery is a bit stand off-ish..... My intent is to motivate and get pilots to protect ther careers and particapte in the process. That is win win for all of us...

I guess I am not ready to beg and plead that a professional pilot take responsibility for his/her own career.

Nonetheless, all of our success is dependant on all of us pulling togther... not fighting, not sueing the Association.... no one gives a Sh#t about us... not even us....

Careers? Process?

Come on Rez, it's a freaking job...and not a very good one.
 
Your delivery, Rez, makes you look like an ass to most of the readers here.

P.S. I've often thought you were a management troll. You have the effect of dividing pilots.

Glad to see you escaped that confining "Summer's Eve" box.

Make a left at the end of the feminine products aisle. The Bile Helper is on the top shelf...a place I doubt you've ever been.
 
Rez... you keep harping on members "taking an active role in their career."

I gotta ask... at what point do you point the finger at the leadership? Is it at 50% participation? Is it at 80% participation? Is it at 20% participation?

Let me ask you this... if a pilot group is having an election, and only 30% of the pilot group votes, do we scrub their votes and have committee members vote in the new status reps and disregard those who voted simply because they're not the "real" majority?
 
Rez... you keep harping on members "taking an active role in their career."

Question: What responsibilities do ALPA members have?

I gotta ask... at what point do you point the finger at the leadership? Is it at 50% participation? Is it at 80% participation? Is it at 20% participation?

How can the membership point the finger at the leadership if they don't particapte.

Look man.... you can sport b!tch all you want.. Call up your elected reps and verbally or even via email tell them what is FUBAR.... but you also have to offer a solution. Anyone can identify problems.... that is mindless!! but can you offer solutions... I mean, real, pragmatic, workable solutions!!

The next problem is one pilot emails his elected rep and says we need to fix this and another pilot emails his rep and says the opposite... now what?

Let me ask you this... if a pilot group is having an election, and only 30% of the pilot group votes, do we scrub their votes and have committee members vote in the new status reps and disregard those who voted simply because they're not the "real" majority?

No. but does that mean we accept low voter turn out?

Again... unions, like our own gov't, are democratic republics. What responsibilities does each member have?
 
Last edited:
Rez, you really must be an ALPA rep because you don't answer any questions - you're off on a tangent.

The question is... AT WHAT POINT DO YOU START HOLDING THE ALPA BOZOS RESPONSIBLE?

Better yet, AT WHAT POINT DOES ALPA BEGIN TO LISTEN TO ITS MEMBERSHIP? 10%, 20%, 80%, 100% only participation? Please do tell...
 
The question is... AT WHAT POINT DO YOU START HOLDING THE ALPA BOZOS RESPONSIBLE?

Pointed, but legitimate question.

The simple answer: ALWAYS!

The system is not designed to let a visceral pilot group burn the house down by recalling reps willy-nilly...but it actuality, that's one of the ways we make them accountable.

Let me give you an example: The F/O rep of Council 1 is one of those who elected pilots at the National level who supported issues his constituents clearly don't support. He also tends to vote contrary to the wishes of his council. He's alienated his fellow LEC reps, and just doesn't play well with others.

But he appeals to those who are angry. Mind you, some of the things they're angry about are things he helped cause...but that connection gets blurry, especially when you're angry!

He could find himself subject to a recall soon, but the odds of it being successful are slim because the process was designed to be difficult.

It should be difficult!

You start holding them accountable by participating. You call your buddies, attend meetings, and confront your reps (the ones accountable!) with their action/inaction on important issues.

You stay within the rules, and don't act with emotion. A calm, articulate pilot...stating facts and demanding answers...has more influence than you think.

Better yet, AT WHAT POINT DOES ALPA BEGIN TO LISTEN TO ITS MEMBERSHIP? 10%, 20%, 80%, 100% only participation? Please do tell...

Depends on the issue. If you're in contract negotiations or strike prep (times that require undisturbed solidarity), single voices seem to have more resonance.

At times like these (recoil and recovery) it will be those with energy that have the most influence.

Consider the paradox of your concern: You believe a small minority are leading the union in the wrong direction...and you want to know how a small minority ("10%, 20%, etc...") can take it back.

How'd they get there to lead?

(Hint: They participated when others didn't...and they didn't quit when it seemed "too hard".)
 

Latest resources

Back
Top