So what you're saying is that an arbitrator (remember, that's what ALPA Merger Policy demands) would've awarded a staple job to TWA? On what precedent do you base that opinion on? We'll be hearing from our arbitrator by June but nobody expects that he'll staple all or for that matter any active US Airways pilots to the AWA list. And USAir in May 2005 was at least as bad off, if not more so, than TWA was in January 2001.
Don't try to read your own situation into it, that's different.
What I'm saying is: there is actual evidence that an ALPA to ALPA merger might have been worse than what APA did to TWAALPA. As evidenced by what UALALPA did to FALALPA in the late 80s.
Recall what UALALPA's RD stated about the late 90s proposed outright purchase of AW? He specifically made sure it was termed a "purchase", to preclude ALPA merger policy.