Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

any new rumors of furloughs at any of the fracs?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Let’s see, zero members of my party are asked to help write the stimulus bill. Three members of my party are allowed to comment on the bill while it’s in committee. Zero members of congress are given time to actually read the bill despite a bi-partisan pledge to post it for public viewing for at least 48 hours before a vote. Yep, I’m a obstructionist if I vote against this thing.
The Dems got 60% of what they wanted and the Reps got 40% (tax cuts) of what they wanted but that's not good enough to claim bipartisan?

I suppose you agree with Rush and claim it is a conspiracy just because he didn't know how to search a PDF file?

Yeah I saw Boehner flop down 1,100 + pages claiming fowl and not having enough time to read it, as a last ditch grandstanding stunt. Almost 90% of the document was made available for almost two weeks prior to the vote. Only the 10% including changes could even remotely be considered rushed. I don't know about you but I can read 100 pages in a couple hours.

Your clown leaders insult us all with their partisan hissy fits. It is pathetic.
 
Last edited:
To bad the GOP is trying its best to obstruct, hoping that the country fails, just to regain power in four years. Yeah, that makes me want to be a Republican.:rolleyes:

Yeah it wouldn't have to do anything with the stimulous bill being a turd that they were given six hours to read before voting, would it.
 
"spend now, pay for it later" isn't that the kind of thinking that got people into foreclosures in the first place? And yet, somehow this is different?
 
The Dems got 60% of what they wanted and the Reps got 40% (tax cuts) of what they wanted but that's not good enough to claim bipartisan?

You might want to double check your tax cut percentage. The analysis I watched on CNN said the final bill had tax cuts that would cost about 25% of the total. And a large chunk of the 25% is not actually tax cuts, it's welfare checks for non-income tax payers.
 
You might want to double check your tax cut percentage. The analysis I watched on CNN said the final bill had tax cuts that would cost about 25% of the total. And a large chunk of the 25% is not actually tax cuts, it's welfare checks for non-income tax payers.

Bingo!!! Hey, that's the democratic way! Free handouts for the poor. Kind of goes hand in hand with sub prime mortgages too doesn't it? Let's let people have things they have no business owning or can afford.

People that make 30K-40K per year per household and live in 400K-500K homes just doesn't add up financially when you do the math. About half of the 120 homes in my neighborhood are in forclosure due to this. I'm sure the Democrats will bail them out as well though. Let's reward the irresponsible people yet again!

When are the people that actually pay their mortgage on time, every time, going to receive a free handout?
 
Last edited:
Anyone heard of anything?

I bet you didn't see that coming, did you? (your thread turning into a CSPAN political argument)

Yes, CS, FX, FLOPS, and XoJet already furloughed. Here at NJA, we're hanging on, no plans to furlough, but that could change tomorrow.
 
How about when Phil Gramm called the American people a "bunch of whiners"? You remember that?

watch the link below, and while this woman's story is sad it is most absolutely whining. This new stimulus is only creating more govt. dependency and people like this woman will never get off their feet and get a job and a house on their own.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpae-kA_4X4


Yeah I saw Boehner flop down 1,100 + pages claiming fowl and not having enough time to read it, as a last ditch grandstanding stunt. Almost 90% of the document was made available for almost two weeks prior to the vote. Only the 10% including changes could even remotely be considered rushed. I don't know about you but I can read 100 pages in a couple hours.

Not sure where you got this info, but when the bill went to conference a large majority of it was changed or revised i.e.-the price tag, some tax cuts were removed, pet projects like Reid's train went from 2 billion to 8 billion, and the home buyers credit just to name a few off the top of my head. Just pull up the copy of the bill on congress' website and observe all of the pen and ink changes. Also if this legislation was so dire that it had to be passed last Friday. Why did the president wait 3-1/2 days to sign it himself. Seems to me that time could have been spent by congress reviewing the document.
 
watch the link below, and while this woman's story is sad it is most absolutely whining. This new stimulus is only creating more govt. dependency and people like this woman will never get off their feet and get a job and a house on their own.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpae-kA_4X4
There is a difference between whining and pleading.

Republicans, who claim to be the moral poilice of America, who are believers in faith should be sympathetic to a person in need. Perhaps the Repuclicans are actually more concerned with lining their pockest with oil (gold), and playing with little boys in bathroom stalls?

"Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the Earth."
 
For those that actually give a sh_t about the original question, at Flex in the last week or so I've come across:

"I heard another 25..."
"I heard another 50..."
"I heard another 75..."
"I heard they're takin' us down to 400..."
"I heard 3 sets of 25, 3 months apart..."
"I heard none until summer..."
"I heard 100 total..."
"I heard that would be it unless (and I like this part) the economy continues to deteriorate..."
"I heard that was it..."
"I heard a fleet size of 75 airplanes..."

and many more... take your pick
 
For those that actually give a sh_t about the original question, at Flex in the last week or so I've come across:

"I heard another 25..."
"I heard another 50..."
"I heard another 75..."
"I heard they're takin' us down to 400..."
"I heard 3 sets of 25, 3 months apart..."
"I heard none until summer..."
"I heard 100 total..."
"I heard that would be it unless (and I like this part) the economy continues to deteriorate..."
"I heard that was it..."
"I heard a fleet size of 75 airplanes..."

and many more... take your pick

Ha, pilot rumors. I love this profesion.
 
For those that actually give a sh_t about the original question, at Flex in the last week or so I've come across:

"I heard another 25..."
"I heard another 50..."
"I heard another 75..."
"I heard they're takin' us down to 400..."
"I heard 3 sets of 25, 3 months apart..."
"I heard none until summer..."
"I heard 100 total..."
"I heard that would be it unless (and I like this part) the economy continues to deteriorate..."
"I heard that was it..."
"I heard a fleet size of 75 airplanes..."

and many more... take your pick

I'll take (F) and (H). Throw in an Air Chef crew meal, a free night at Haxmat Heights, and I'll give you the phone number of a flight attendent to be named later!
 
You might want to double check your tax cut percentage. The analysis I watched on CNN said the final bill had tax cuts that would cost about 25% of the total. And a large chunk of the 25% is not actually tax cuts, it's welfare checks for non-income tax payers.

$288 Billion in tax relief out of $787 Billion is 36%.

http://www.recovery.gov/


Why are tax breaks to the rich considered good fiscial responsibility to the republicans, while doing the same thing for the less wealthy is considered welfare?

By the way, increasing funds to the people that will spend it instead of paying down debt or saving it, is by definition what the Stimulus is supposed to do.

More Republican Blah Blah Blah.

Do you even know anyone that makes the 30K a year? Go spew your garbage to them. I'll bet you get your a$$ kicked.
 
Last edited:
Do you even know anyone that makes the 30K a year? Go spew your garbage to them. I'll bet you get your a$$ kicked.

I do, and they don't pay taxes. To send tax rebates to someone NOT paying taxes is WELFARE. Call it what you like but it's my $$$$ going to someone not paying $$$$. Yours too, capt dad.
 
$288 Billion in tax relief out of $787 Billion is 36%.

http://www.recovery.gov/


Why are tax breaks to the rich considered good fiscial responsibility to the republicans, while doing the same thing for the less wealthy is considered welfare?

By the way, increasing funds to the people that will spend it instead of paying down debt or saving it, is by definition what the Stimulus is supposed to do.

More Republican Blah Blah Blah.

Do you even know anyone that makes the 30K a year? Go spew your garbage to them. I'll bet you get your a$$ kicked.


Your little golden boys stimulus package is gonna fail miserably. Watch and see.....
 
And he believes "O" today when he said that this stimulus package doesn't have any earmarks or pork. I about shat myself when he said that. Train from LA to Vegas (Reid), study the marshlands around San Fran (Pelosi), frisbee golf in Austin. Gimme a break. Just watch the Dow fool, their reaction speaks volumes. (No pun intended).
 
You're arguing over deck chairs on the Titanic boys. The party's over.


As for Flex I've heard only 80ish net cum sold. We have 101 aircraft. Do the math. More furloughs are on the way.
 
Your little golden boys stimulus package is gonna fail miserably. Watch and see.....

And let me guess. Somehow, the first plan through Bernanke and Paulson is going to miraculously work better?

All this amounts to is sour grapes on behalf of the sore losers from this past November.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top