Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

An different article on a USAF leader

  • Thread starter Thread starter milplt
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 17

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

milplt

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Posts
85
A different article on a USAF leader

This is just the beginning of the article, the full text is at http://www.sftt.org/cgi-bin/csNews/csNews.cgi?database=DefenseWatch%202006.db&command=viewone&op=t&id=93. Among other things, it makes a small point of how USAF personnel are not allowed to distinguish themselves from each other (combat vs. non-combat, operational aircrew vs. MWR officer, etc) lest we look for special treatment - EXCEPT, when it comes to the commander or pentagon service badge or some other officially sanctioned distinction.



Hollow Core Values


[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]By Nelson Kane
Integrity First... Service Before Self... Excellence in All We Do...
What happened to Fly and Fight, Fight to Win?
Oh, sorry. That was the Air Force. Not the Air and Space and Information Dominance... whatever Force.
Core Values, ever changing ‘Visions’ and Mission Statements... new uniforms... leadership failures. These are all symptomatic of one thing.
Across the board the United States Air Force lacks a coherent focus. It has no sense of itself regardless of the platitudes mouthed by its... leaders.
Most of them are definitely part of the problem anyway. The victories won in the air since 1991 were won by the flyers. Hard flying and hard working aviators, usually below the rank of lieutenant colonel, who continue to ‘make it happen.’ And they make it happen despite the trite silliness of general officers who promote themselves on their ability to reinvent the wheel and wrap it in new paper.
The emphasis placed in definitions, visions and platitudes only serves to illustrate the utter lack of realistic direction from the top. In simple terms, when you know what you’re doing you don’t need to run around telling everyone. You just do it.

Air Force Chief of Staff


T. Michael ‘Buzz’ Moseley

(af.mil photo)

This is precisely why, in this turbulent, unsettled and downright confusing time, Air Force Chief of Staff T. Michael ‘Buzz’ Moseley is concentrating on something he truly understands.

Changing the Air Force uniform... again.
But lest you believe that’s the only item on his failing, incoherent agenda, T. Michael has also created new badges for Pentagon staff officers to wear. Not knowing what to do with critical issues like morale, over deployment and aging aircraft, he and his Yes People have chosen to concentrate on superfluous fluff.

The Pentagon Service Badge.
Can anyone think of anything less impressive and more downright ludicrous? Is there any clearer statement from this latest Polyester Pretender about what he considers important in an officer’s career - Pentagon service?
A cheap piece of enameled tin symbolizing... what? The ability to be a non thinking drone? The capability to nod your head ‘Yes’ at an amazing speed and frequency? This latest absurdity sends a clear, unequivocal message to young officers everywhere. Not to mention our current and future enemies. The American military, especially the Air Force, considers upwardly mobile staff officers more vital than combat officers.

Nice going T. Michael.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
 
Last edited:
Well...the part about some officers bailing for the ANG is 100% right.

Also--the ANG has done a LOT of the workload since 2001. Those missing warriors are still out there--just busy at Bagram and Balad and not at Andrews or the Pentagon....and perhaps wearing a different patch.
 
Amen... Just on the ground at Balad a few days ago. Those guys are working hard over there -- lots of Guard and reserve.
 
AlbieF15 said:
Well...the part about some officers bailing is 100% right.

and perhaps wearing a different patch.

Yep, like Southwest Airlines.;)
 
I heard a guy joke that the Core Values have become:
- Situational Integrity
- The Appearance of Excellence in All We Do
- Service Yourself
 
Last edited:
I'm currently in a joint assignment as a Reservist. The best officers are Marines, #2 is Army. Air Force and Navy ... well, I'm not impressed.
I bow my head in shame while I watch my fellow Air Force officers get wrapped around the axle about a stupid performance report or PRF.
 
Andy said:
I'm currently in a joint assignment as a Reservist. The best officers are Marines, #2 is Army. Air Force and Navy ... well, I'm not impressed.
I bow my head in shame while I watch my fellow Air Force officers get wrapped around the axle about a stupid performance report or PRF.

You are correct. The answer is quite simple... The Marines and the Army tend to actually promote men who know how to fight wars and get the job done. The current incarnation of the Air Force has a bizarre system whereby true warfighters (not paper "warriors') are left as road kill in the mad scramble to the top. "Not fit for O-6" is the usual recommendation for men that know how to fly and fight. But the administrative, butt-kissing political weasel makes O-6 below the zone, and once at the top, this same guy looks for like-minded weasels to join him.

A critical mass was reached about 25 years ago. True warriors began to retire; they were replaced with weasels. The balance of power shifted.

The heros of old are no more. Billy Mitchell, Doolittle, Bong, Jabara, Olds - all would have been RIFed and flying for SWA.
 
Alot has to do IMO with the way the AF is set up. O's and E's are basically seperated, due to the seperation of Maint and operations. So you have the Support on an equal footing with the operations, which is a mistake, as well as 50 O's and 15 E's in an operational squadron, and 4 O's and 100 E's in the MAint squadron.
 
Today's 25 yr Col has probably spent 15 yrs in schools making himself more promotable. That is why he/she is not a warrior. Most of them have troubled families or are on a second wife. I noticed a lack of integrity in the senior officers way back when I was a 2lt. It isn't a new thing, just more condoned. I remember when an officer could cash a check at the BX, commissary or the O'club, not anymore. The officers did a poor job of policing themselves and now those losers are running the shop. I doubt things will ever change for the better. Only the uniforms, ensignias and mottos will change, because the AF doesn't life traditions.
 
got to sit in on a OG staff meeting a couple of months ago, 2+ hours to give a 5 minute brief on aircrew training. Of that two hours there was the five minutes for my brief, about 10 minutes and two slides on what aircraft/crews were flying what missions and their status, and the rest of the time was spent on OPR/EPR and awards and decs.
 
The AF also differs from the other services in that the enlisted send the officers off to war(for the most part) which is the opposite of the Army and Marines. I think that has an effect on the O + E relations as well.
 
Slice that is a very narrow view. There a several positions in the AF that go to war that aren't "O". Maybe you didn't see the video of the combat controllers in Afghanistan calling in air strikes on their own position to stop the Taliban from overrunning them.
 
Let's not forget that it is these leaders who have created an operational environment where they literally have a JAG sitting at their side in the CAOC QC'ing operational decisions. They are literally unable to make timely/critical - and most important, correct - decisions. Leadership by committee. Could we find another Gen Patton or LeMay if we had to? These current crop are also the leaders who have taken to preferring criminal charges for mistakes made in combat - and I am not talking about raping and killing of civilians, I am talking about honest mistakes made in fog/friction of war. I spoke personally with an ETAC at the battle for Haditha Dam in Iraq that had to kick F-16's out of the battle because they would not drop on the target for fear of violating the ROE. Of course, this is while the Rangers were taking direct fire from the very target - thereby removing any ROE restrictions. Troops in contact should equal dropping the bombs - guilt by association used to apply in warfare - so don't stand next to the guys shooting guns if you don't want to be collateral damage. And it is not strictly a USAF problem, just ask Lt Pantano - although we are probably the biggest violators. It isn't even a strictly military thing - as evidenced by the two border patrol officers facing 20-yrs in prison (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51417).

There is an overall lack of leadership and integrity throughout our system. Thankfully, we still have individual soldiers who win wars despite the leadership, cops who still patrol despite the politicians, etc
 
Benhuntn said:
Slice that is a very narrow view. There a several positions in the AF that go to war that aren't "O". Maybe you didn't see the video of the combat controllers in Afghanistan calling in air strikes on their own position to stop the Taliban from overrunning them.
That's what (for the most part) meant. I'm not discounting PJ's, JTACS, etc. But when you look at AF percentages as compared to other services it's obvious and in my opinion negatively affects O + E relations. Too many shoe clerks on both sides of the fence these days.
 
Every aviator officer in the ANG can tell you stories about the admin guys who went to AMS/OTS with them and were promoted years ahead of them. They go to drill once a month and never deploy and are O-5's in the min time while the ops guys get stuck as an O-3/O-4 for the max time. Though we in ops and mx can silently sit with the saticfaction of knowing that we are putting ourselves in harms way while other climb our backs for promotion.
 
One of my friends in the Viper community picked up Robin Olds for a speech Old gave. Olds ripped current AF leadership a new one in this speech, for how the biggest threat to a USAF officers career is no longer the enemy, but from the USAF.
 
Don't forget all the guys running over each other to get bronze stars in OEF/OIF.
 
pkober said:
Don't forget all the guys running over each other to get bronze stars in OEF/OIF.


All you have to do is be a "mission commander" for about 30 days. I'd say 90% of operational 0-5's at Hurlburt have bronze stars. Multiple for all squadron commanders. Add some NCO's and maintenance/support 0-2 and 0-3s to the list and it's astronomical. Of course, aircrew just does the flying and gets nothing. Except for the occasional inflated DFC or Silver Star. Of all the DFCs out there, probably only half are legitimate. DISCLAIMER: I don't have one.

On a separate note, just heard today of an officer getting the coveted job of "WING COMMANDER EXECUTIVE OFFICER." Part of what's wrong with the AF is that somehow they feel answering phones, doing busy work, and keeping up with the wing commander's schedule qualifies you to lead men and women into combat. It's also funny how most people in that job are not school selects on the 0-4 board. Thus, they get the job b/c they "need" it for school. They then "go to school," get picked for SAAS, get a joint HQ job, go to another school, get requalified in an airplane they haven't flown for 5 years, become an ADO or DO until they find a squadron for you, make you a commander for another 12-14 months max, send you to another school, send you to the pentagon, bring you back to an airplane for requal that you haven't flown in 4 years, and then make you an OG! All because you had a mediocre flying career for the first 6 years and didn't get picked up as a school select you end up as a group commander leading (sending) men and women into combat.
 
Duece,

What in the world do you know about command? Okay, you have flown combat missions. But have you ever felt the true pressure of getting the power point slide just right for the CC? Have you ever been the CC schedule pressure cooker? Have you ever felt the strain of having to get the CC car clean in time for the general arriving? That is all it takes to qualify you for command. Combat means nothing but making sure the #2 pencils on the little round thing on the CC desk are sharp is the real deal.

As far a fake medals go. We have an ASOS unit. About twice a year we have a commanders call where some of them get real bronze stars. You know the ones with "V". I always wonder what the "I have a certain rank so therefore I deserve this medal" bronze star winners think when they see these true warriors get the medals they earned. I know I would be a little embarassed.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top